2 ms·

> If NATO wasn't as expansive, Russia probably wouldn't have invaded. J The only thing keeping Russia in check in eastern Europe in anyway, shape or form is NA

by _kbh_ 4y ago

> If NATO wasn't as expansive, Russia probably wouldn't have invaded. J The only thing keeping Russia in check in eastern Europe in anyway, shape or form is NATO. NATO expansion stops Russian aggression not the other way around, but I know the forever belied Russia must always be a victim of some nefarious plot from the entire world. The only way to stop Russias numerous wars in Eastern Europe and there dangerous escalation is to have them dealt a decisive defeat in Ukraine.

4gotunameagain 4y ago
Going through your comment history, I would say you are either a very passionate american nationalist, or a state sponsored propaganda parrot ;) Ukraine was clearly in the sphere of influence of Russia. Why was the US flirting with it ? Do you see Russia openly courting Mexico ? No.
- _kbh_ 4y ago
  > Going through your comment history, I would say you are either a very passionate american nationalist, or a state sponsored propaganda parrot ;) Im neither American or paid to be here, I just don't like imperialist wars of conquest regardless of who starts them. > Ukraine was clearly in the sphere of influence of Russia. If by that you mean previously forcibly occupied by the USSR and therefore Russia sure. > Why was the US flirting with it ? Do you see Russia openly courting Mexico ? No. Russia is free to court whomever they want, no one would really care, things have changed in the past 50-60 years seemingly everywhere but Russia,
- 988747 4y ago
  [dead]