_-david-_

7 ms·

31.
by _-david-_ 4y ago
This article puts systematic stupidity on display.
32.
by _-david-_ 4y ago
Incorruptible bodies are not proof of sainthood. Also, I assume Lenin's body had something done to it?
33.
by _-david-_ 4y ago
The Navy has a patent on creating fake UFOs that appear on radar and other sensors so that seems like a perfectly logical explanation. It would also explain why the Navy disproportionately sees the UFOs when compared to the Air Force. http
34.
by _-david-_ 4y ago
It is a perfect example. Guns are sometimes used for bad things just like encryption. Encryption, just like guns, are a right regardless.
35.
by _-david-_ 4y ago
This is no different than treason, hiring a hitman, fraud or libel. The founders did not consider any of those to be free speech as well. Everybody at the time understood obscenity was not protected so there was no need to explicitly call i
36.
by _-david-_ 4y ago
I encourage you to talk to some people in extremely undeveloped countries about the problems with detaining people for decades. I would especially recommend talking to people in the most remote areas of the underdeveloped countries. They li
37.
by _-david-_ 4y ago
I don't think anybody is denying that innocent people will be killed by the death penalty. Which is worse: 100 innocent people being killed by the death penalty or 100 innocent people getting killed by murderers? This is the calculatio
38.
by _-david-_ 4y ago
The poster is likely referring to the fact that 85% (or there about) of journalists are registered in one political party.
39.
CBO’s 2022 Long-Term Projections for Social Security(cbo.gov)
2 points by _-david-_ 4y ago|0 comments
40.
by _-david-_ 4y ago
To be clear, I was just using murder as an example. You have to add in rape, terrorism, and other crimes that the Taliban executes people for. We have no clue how many people they are holding in jail and how many are executed. Do you think
41.
by _-david-_ 4y ago
>The death penalty is abhorrent and indefensible Believe it or not, but some places don't have the resources to hold people in jail for decades. If there was a murderer and the place had no way to actually keep the murderer away fro
42.
by _-david-_ 4y ago
I am not suggesting that everybody should have to work every day to survive. I don't think that would be good. I am also not suggesting that having life and death situations are good. If that is what you thought I was saying then you a
43.
by _-david-_ 4y ago
Somebody watching videos and changing views on politics or culture or whatever isn't an interesting event. They are literally just mindlessly sitting and staring all day. Do you think you could make a 15 minute video about a day in the
44.
by _-david-_ 4y ago
I don't think that is why. An all day digital person is the same as any other all day digital person. Nothing unique or interesting happens to them. They may even be watching the exact same content. If you have seen one all day digital
45.
by _-david-_ 4y ago
>Is anyone alleging that Baldwin loaded the gun with live ammo that he pulled off his own belt? Yes, though it is a small minority and seems mostly like some sort of conspiracy theory. > Every account I've read has the armorer lo
46.
by _-david-_ 4y ago
We don't know somebody else cut the brakes. Baldwin allegedly had real bullets on his belt. If Baldwin cut the brakes in his car and then ran somebody over it would be his fault.
47.
by _-david-_ 4y ago
>If by this whole thing you mean Trump's conduct which is the subject of the criminal grand jury investigation which produced the subpoenas with which he failed to comply, resulting in the search warrant, yes, the conduct started be
48.
by _-david-_ 4y ago
It is material since this whole thing started well before Trump's noncompliance. Trump allowed the NARA to retrieve 15 boxes in January. He was also told to put an extra lock on the room with the documents. Clearly the government knew
49.
by _-david-_ 4y ago
States do this with all sorts of other laws. Look at the tax code in states for example. This isn't really unique.
50.
by _-david-_ 4y ago
>There are certain procedures that need to be followed to declassify documents which Trump definitely did not follow. There is debate if a president needs to follow any specific procedure. >Also, I've read the legal briefings. Tr
51.
by _-david-_ 4y ago
Are you saying I am making and assertion without proof or that Trump did?
52.
by _-david-_ 4y ago
>In the former case, the individual in question refused on multiple instances to return classified information when asked, and even after a search warrant, filed a lawsuit to demand the classified information back You are selectively lea
53.
by _-david-_ 4y ago
I think the person was referring to decision on the legality of abortion, not the decision of having an abortion. Instead of forcing the legality at the federal level it is now at the state level.
54.
by _-david-_ 4y ago
Why just stop being racist when you can enforce racism as a means to not have racism?
55.
by _-david-_ 4y ago
It doesn't matter if it is "clearly" being abused, only if it is abused.
56.
by _-david-_ 4y ago
We don't know if they are domestic or not and we don't know the motives.
57.
by _-david-_ 4y ago
Schwab did not say that. It was Danish MP Ida Auken.
58.
by _-david-_ 4y ago
An accusation is not proof and to top it off, doesn't prove it was Alito.
59.
by _-david-_ 4y ago
Did I miss something? The article claims Alito did it, but Alito never admitted it and no investigation came to the conclusion he did.
60.
by _-david-_ 4y ago
Are you sure Alito is actually on record of having done it before? I know he was accused of doing it before, but as far as I can tell he never admitted it and no official investigation found any proof he did it. Am I missing something or ar

More ›