Zurrrrr

20 ms·

181.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
You presumed wrong.
182.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
I didn't know that, but yeah that makes a lot of sense. Thanks for sharing that, that was interesting to learn.
183.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
Trying to map natural language statements to formal logic doesn't work well, unless you make a ton of assumptions as you have here...and then it still doesn't work well.
184.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
I never claimed such a thing. What a ridiculous takeaway.
185.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
No it's on my list to read, I was just curious if you had looked it up or memorized the name. Just a random passing thought I decided to turn into a comment. Thanks for answering!
186.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
No reason to say that though. The person you replied to was saying it is a shame it is an emotionally charged discussion and he is right. That one particular discussion on HN might not be emotionally charged doesn't negate his point. W
187.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
He's talking about the fact that Aboriginals, not unlike Native Americans, reject any attempt to explain their origin via science as they stick to the story of their origin that comes from their religion, and see the science based orig
188.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
Did you have to look up the name of the author of Sapiens or you have it committed to memory?
189.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
Again, no. You're still making a ton of assumptions. Maybe self-reflect before posting your next reply.
190.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
No. I was much more specific with my statement. Your comments are based on your own extrapolation.
191.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
I can only see it affecting 'art', where you might want to have characters that are despicable say despicable things. But really we shouldn't be using AI to make our art for us anyway. Help, sure, but it shouldn't be lit
192.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
Ubuntu is the Windows of Linux. If you're a more technical user, no reason to run it since you can have something leaner and more fine-tuned and customized to you're needed. But if you're not a technical user, it's proba
193.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
It's really amazing seeing how much stuff gets flagged and removed as though even discussing it is dangerous.
194.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
Why are you a fan? It seems to be unsubstantiated speculation.
195.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
That's what I get for replying to replies out of context and going by memory. Oh well.
196.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
Safari is real. People mean Chrome or Firefox on iOS are not real because they are just skins for Safari.
197.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
Acting like you don't know what a real browser means in this context just so you can be mock offended. Oh you Apple users.
198.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
I'm guessing from your username you were born in 97. How are you that young and arrogant and condescending lol. There's no 'breakthrough' I'm close to or need to have. I said everything I needed to say and it remain
199.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
There's a lot of people who grew up in the region you did who come to the weat and are suspicious and downright dismissive of many leftist ideals. That's a shame. Your experiences don't invalidate their talking points and it
200.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
Where did I ver say anything that indicated I thought it was a new phenomenon or that I was limiting what I was describing to a short time frame? That aside, no idea what you are arguing here. It seems to be that because critical thinking w
201.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
I was diagnosed with ADD as a kid, not ADHD (that was my brother). I assume I have it with how much I jump around mentally, but who cares? This is who I am. It's not any kind of problem unless you're being forced into some kind of
202.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
It's not so much I'm shouting "think harder people", more lamenting that I think it's too late. The shouting should have been done about 30 years ago. I'm cynical, but I don't really see a path forward for
203.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
I've never seen anyone defend and make excuses for people not thinking critically. Sure, trust is one thing, and we relax critical thinking....but trust among people we know has nothing to do with failures as large as thinking, say 5G
204.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
I don't see how to solve this. This is the same root cause that causes people to be 911 truthers or qanon or to vote for clearly nonsense candidates. It's a lack of critical thinking, and it's an epidemic. When you have peopl
205.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
Not trying to fight at all, but no time for someone that has such trouble comprehending something and then blames the author instead of being able to self-reflect. Best of luck to you in life, Champ.
206.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
> This example of yours would begin with an exploit (or feature) of the third-party software, which in turn managed to pivot into an exploitable hole in the kernel/base system in order to gain these escalated privileges. Securing th
207.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
No, you ARE making a claim, and that claim is bullshit. Certain knowledge is required to understand what I wrote and why it makes sense. And it does make sense, which is why other people were able to meaningfully respond to what I wrote. It
208.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
I don't see how - not to the point where you're claiming you couldn't understand any of what I said. Why didn't other people have that problem, if it was me?
209.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
The whole thing about SELinux being so bad it's always just disabled simply isn't true. Red Hat and Fedora have been using it in the default setup for ages, with permissive roles for unknown stuff but things that ship with RHAT lo
210.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
It did make sense, so I'm guessing it's just beyond your technical level of comprehension. I'd suggest reading up more on what stuff like SELinux actually does.

More ›