Zurrrrr

21 ms·

211.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
Take a breath. Read it again. If you still don't understand something, think about what it is you don't understand, then state your issue clearly so I can help you.
212.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
Only on and off for like 20 years....
213.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
On most servers, programs are not doing drastically new things. That really isn't the issue you make it out to be. The developer applying restrictions ahead of time can't, by nature, mitigate the types of bugs that things like SEL
214.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
No. It means if you look at any number of the security vulnerabilities that affected OpenBSD base system that they disclosed, or any number of bugs in third party software they haven't audieted, out of the vulns that allow root and&#x2
215.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
Rules might be a pain, but no more so than writing good firewall rules, and once done don't have to be done again. It's not the issue some make it out to be
216.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
I think that is a flawed way of looking at it. Stuff like SELinux assumes the system administrator or software can't be trusted, and provides ways to protect against future attacks while enforcing only the minimal access needed. It isn
217.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
Security is more than just auditing code to remove bugs - it's also being prepared for worst case scenarios for bugs that inevitably exist but have not yet been found. For a security focused OS, OpenBSD is terrible in this regard. Pled
218.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
This was always nonsense. So is "You're the product, not the consumer". Doesn't stop people from believing in it with their whole heart and mocking anyone that dare suggest different.
219.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
Or at the least 7 out of 10 dentists agree
220.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
It probably saw the daughter accessed stuff from a home IP address so suggested stuff to every device on that same IP.
221.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
Yeah, none of that really comes close enough, it's better than nothing though.
222.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
It's nice to see sharing between the *BSDs for sure.
223.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
I know what you are referring to, iirc it's very out of date now. OpenBSD focuses on auditing to try and remove bugs. This is great. But it also makes sense to prepare for bugs as an eventually since you might not have found them to au
224.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
Stuff like KUBSAN, KASAN, KMSAN, KCSAN which detect problems at runtime. There isn't anything even close in other OSs. Something like VeriExec would be nice as well. And while NetBSD doesn't have it either, some type of MAC or RBA
225.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
I don't see much point in OBSD to be honest. Most of the claims to security are bogus (auditing is great, but it's not a reason to omit actual security features). NetBSD has honestly seen much more interesting to me, cleaner tight
226.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
This is nice. This is why I like to use minimal distros like Alpine or Void, so I know where everything is on my system and have some control over it.
227.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
I don't know what to tell you, but your experience is very different from mine and most androids users (who knew what they were doing). Disable all the software crap and there was no real difference. You think it was more internal to t
228.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
It had to have been the apps that were running on Android. It's nothing to do with the hardware. I used to have my pixels, back from 2012, regularly at less than 10%, and would still last overnight as you describe. If a pixel not runni
229.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
They've never been that bad in my experience. My guess is you were using something preinstalled with a ton of battery leeching crap. Android itself doesn't do that, but much like buying a PC, it's hard to stop manufacturers l
230.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
Pretty much any phone would only take 5% over 6-8 hours if being inactive and just waiting for an alarm to go off.
231.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
Compare it to a Pixel or stock firmware and see if that's true. Even if it is, it's such a huge compromise to use an Apple device given the nannying and lack of features, it isn't worth it.
232.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
Yeah it's drawn my interest for a while now. I think it has a lot of interesting security features that look fun to explore, and there is some functionality I would like to try porting to it also. Otherwise it's void if I can get
233.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
If you own your device, no reason you HAVE to be tied to Adobe, it's just about compromise.
234.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
As a game developer I can see how you would be tied. I'm pretty lucky in that my gaming sticks to a few specific games for multiplayer (GTA online, counter-strike, sometimes red alert 2, nrs games) an a few specific AAA titles I want t
235.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
No, but I'm choosing to trust the developer for the moment. https://www.waterfox.net/docs/faq
236.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
It's hardly a story.
237.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
I don't think profiles are that important when most users have their own account these days.
238.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
I use Waterfox personally, but it's a minor difference. Some lesser known extensions: LocalCDN Tab Session Manager Feedbro Enhancer for YouTube Request Control Trace There is a lot of configuration you can do with a user.js file as wel
239.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
I'm talking about when there is no noticeable difference in experience, except in peoples minds. I'm obviously not denying there are times when there would be objective improvements, that just isn't what I was referring to.
240.
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
Sure, internet matters. Equipment matters less these days. All I'm saying though, is if you're a crappy player, it's not because of your equipment, and buying better equipment won't make you a better player.

More ›