4 ms·
I can only see it affecting 'art', where you might want to have characters that are despicable say despicable things. But really we shouldn't be using AI to ma
by Zurrrrr 4y ago
I can only see it affecting 'art', where you might want to have characters that are despicable say despicable things.
But really we shouldn't be using AI to make our art for us anyway. Help, sure, but it shouldn't be literally writing our stories.
- CuriouslyC 4y agoSo you feel that when progress enables us to provide more abundance for humanity, we should artificially limit that abundance for everyone so that a few people aren't inconvenienced?
- Zurrrrr 4y ago[flagged]
- CuriouslyC 4y agoYou stated that AI shouldn't be creating, because humans should be creating. Think about the motivations and implications for that for a minute.
- Zurrrrr 4y agoNo. I was much more specific with my statement. Your comments are based on your own extrapolation.
- CuriouslyC 4y agoSo, the same logic, in analogous domains, but once case good, the other case bad, because you prefer one.
- Zurrrrr 4y agoAgain, no. You're still making a ton of assumptions. Maybe self-reflect before posting your next reply.