Zetice

31 ms·

421.
by Zetice 3y ago
The presumption here is that it was a true replication, and that's pretty damn hard to accomplish in the soft sciences. It matters, just not nearly as much or as conclusively as in something like physics.
422.
by Zetice 3y ago
Astrology is many orders less predictive than psychology... Huge swaths of behavioral economics have replicated successfully. Care to cite peer-reviewed studies related to astrology that have successfully replicated?
423.
by Zetice 3y ago
Failure to replicate doesn't mean the original findings aren't true or useful. A thousand things besides "the original finding is wrong" can happen to cause a failure of replication. If you limit your understanding to s
424.
by Zetice 3y ago
Not sure how that's relevant, unless you're suggesting that because some frauds exist in a given field, therefore all members of that field are frauds?
425.
by Zetice 3y ago
>Don't take a (strong) position on something you don't understand or have equally strong evidence for. ...or else what? We all live in a world of specialization certainly, but we also live in a world where we must make decisi
426.
by Zetice 3y ago
Seems a bit extreme to throw out a whole set of concepts (nudge, behavioral economics) because one person may have fabricated some data. How could he have successfully executed this fabrication? Doesn't he work with entire teams o
427.
by Zetice 3y ago
Most things do have terms of service (not Terms of Service), including copyright law.
428.
by Zetice 3y ago
I downvote anything I don't want seen more, and upvote anything I want seen more. Simple as that. Trying to do more seems like you're imposing your will onto others. Just let folks do what they want.
429.
by Zetice 3y ago
...so are terms of use, which often include "you can't share this without my permission" so even if copyright law weren't so awful, the people who would be doing the sharing would still be breaking an agreement to do so.
430.
by Zetice 3y ago
For anything I said to have been an ad hominem I would have needed to disqualify your argument as a result of who you are. Considering what I've said here is that you misunderstand my argument, not that your interpretation is wrong
431.
by Zetice 3y ago
This ideology takes a good idea and pushes it too far. There isn’t a lot of value in seriously considering oneself as a “failure”, and rarely is it actually true. Perspective to recognize the lack of any such way to measure outcomes so boo
432.
by Zetice 3y ago
…someone might believe it enough to kill themselves or others. Absolutism helps no one, and you already rely in the government to protect you in a number of “authoritarian” ways, so it’s not like you have a moral opposition to the idea.
433.
by Zetice 3y ago
That defeats the entire purpose of Bluesky, also ActivityPub is objectively worse…
434.
by Zetice 3y ago
Threads will probably integrate with the AT Proto at some point anyway...
435.
by Zetice 3y ago
Not only can you not beat Django's modeling in Python, but I simply cannot find an in-kind solution in JS either. Nothing covers all of the bases the way Django does, or more specifically DRF/graphene-django. The current state of
436.
by Zetice 3y ago
You're not recalling the example I and the judge also cited, which was the Biden quote. There's no way Biden's quote is coercive. Zero way whatsoever.
437.
by Zetice 3y ago
What implied threats, what threatening tone? What position of power? If you read the examples cited, nothing even remotely comes close to a layperson interpretation of coercion, and I believe the legal definition is more rigorous, not le
438.
by Zetice 3y ago
People shouldn't be allowed to speak their piece when that piece can be bright-line traced to people dying. But fine, let's allow people to speak their piece because bright lines are hard to draw, starting with Twitter, who shou
439.
by Zetice 3y ago
Coercion requires a stick, I see no stick here. The judge literally cited Biden saying, "they're killing people" as coercion, which is a bald-faced lie.
440.
by Zetice 3y ago
And I see refusal to follow those orders from a person who recognizes they're not a subordinate.
441.
by Zetice 3y ago
And yet he will still likely demand I personally post this very same link, because for some reason that's important...
442.
by Zetice 3y ago
The fact that you can't even tell how emotionally invested you got here is probably the main takeaway from this conversation, for you. You took what I said, that blindly trusting a random source on the Internet to the point of spendi
443.
by Zetice 3y ago
Ah, so you have no clue what I said. Thanks for clarifying, makes it easy to dismiss your emotional outbursts as such. Let me know if you figure out what my argument was, and maybe we can discuss, but it honestly seems out of your grasp at
444.
by Zetice 3y ago
Restate what you think I said.
445.
by Zetice 3y ago
> We're discussing this in a broader sense than the OP right? No. > I understand you as dismissing anything not from a reputable institution. Nope. > What? I said, I didn't ask why you cared about talking to me, I asked w
446.
by Zetice 3y ago
It doesn't take being an L7 engineer at Walmart to hit the same compensation as an SDE2 at Amazon (L7 @ WMT is $493k vs SDE2 @ AMZN is $243k according to levels.fyi). You still don't understand that Walmart tech jobs aren't
447.
by Zetice 3y ago
I didn't say 1 to L7 was "in the ballpark" and neither did you, because you knew that'd be wrong. And yes, dozens . Many dozens. Hundreds, even hit the "ballpark" of FAANG pay, especially now. FAANG isn&#x2
448.
by Zetice 3y ago
What phrase, if you had to choose one, would you describe the group of people who do this work? The work, as you clearly explain here, is how bias gets introduced? Maybe, perhaps, news media?
449.
by Zetice 3y ago
I don't owe you any links, I am not here to do your research for you. You already found one company that pays similarly, levels.fyi will give you dozens of others, you even named a few who do pay in a similar ballpark as FAANG. Besi
450.
by Zetice 3y ago
> I still find different approaches and other peoples' experience interesting ...except this is the literal opposite of that, this is presented as an introductory resource. The literal opposite of "other peoples' experien

More ›