3 ms·
For anything I said to have been an ad hominem I would have needed to disqualify your argument as a result of who you are. Considering what I've said here is t
by Zetice 3y ago
For anything I said to have been an ad hominem I would have needed to disqualify your argument as a result of who you are. Considering what I've said here is that you misunderstand my argument, not that your interpretation is wrong because of some facet of yourself, it is therefore not an ad hominem.
Any evaluation of you on my part is in addition to you being wrong, not a logical cause of your wrongness. But I do appreciate the admission that you're not all that well educated, it does help me understand why this petty little disagreement means so much to you.
- worksonmine 3y agoAll that just to end with exactly your own definition of ad hominem. Congratulations, have a medal. If you're curious I AM uneducated, did you have a point? There are no misunderstandings, I read (and quote) you literally. I've been patient and given you several chances to rephrase but you refuse and resort to this. What more can I do?