Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Zetice
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
26 ms
·
301.
▲
by
Zetice
3y ago
Discord isn’t worse than an IRC client because it doesn’t log private chats, it’s superior because it doesn’t log private chats. And if you thing your “other things” are unique to Discord you’re kidding yourself.
302.
▲
by
Zetice
3y ago
Either you have a concern, in which case you can and should do something about it, or you don’t and just commented for no reason.
303.
▲
by
Zetice
3y ago
If you have everything you need, why did you complain? And insults do you no good here. Would any of the hateful words you wrote above mean anything at all to you if I wrote them?
304.
▲
by
Zetice
3y ago
Sorry but this passive voice over a completely open system is intolerable. Fix it yourself. It annoys me.
305.
▲
by
Zetice
3y ago
Then why bring up IRC’s lack of a “pleasant” app? Just seems like a problem you can and should solve for yourself, but is otherwise wholly unrelated to the protocol. One doesn’t complain about http because the mobile browser options aren’t
306.
▲
by
Zetice
3y ago
I also agree most orgs don’t execute information management well. Knowing chat isn’t a good place for that doesn’t mean they know anything else!
307.
▲
by
Zetice
3y ago
IRC isn’t an app, it’s a protocol. If you don’t like IRC clients as they exist, write or fund one of your own.
308.
▲
by
Zetice
3y ago
Yeah, why don’t murderers just commit their murders via their company?
309.
▲
by
Zetice
3y ago
More like your company is in the minority; most orgs recognize the problem with that idea…
310.
▲
by
Zetice
3y ago
Anyone can sue for anything, asking to not do things that create lawsuits is asking not to operate a business in the US.
311.
▲
by
Zetice
3y ago
Literally all of your concerns are 100% solved by adding a log bot to the channels you care about, both on IRC and Discord. I’m beyond sick of the helplessness performative shtick around Discord. This is an ancient problem with obvious sol
312.
▲
by
Zetice
3y ago
Are there courses in law school that prepare you well for this specific kind of law work, or did you learn most of what you do through working with folks who had the necessary expertise that could then be passed along through training?
313.
▲
by
Zetice
3y ago
To add to this, PII isn't always even clear. Different jurisdictions identify PII differently, there isn't One Master Definition that you pass a unit of data through, upon which an authoritative "THIS IS PII" or "T
314.
▲
by
Zetice
3y ago
Why oh why do the people who care a Very Much Lot about privacy assume everyone else does too, or should on some moral axis? Like the very nature of not thinking of privacy as some value worth maximizing is in and of itself an Evil Act? Wh
315.
▲
by
Zetice
3y ago
This is the argument. This is not a hint, a clue, an implication, it is me directly stating what the argument is: The argument, as I've repeated over and over, is simple; what scientists publish is what matters. What they say in priva
316.
▲
by
Zetice
3y ago
...that's not how conversations work. You aren't in charge here.
317.
▲
by
Zetice
3y ago
The argument, as I've repeated over and over, is simple; what scientists publish is what matters. What they say in private Slack chats and emails is entirely irrelevant. I await these authors collective retractions, but lacking that, t
318.
▲
by
Zetice
3y ago
You're using quotes wrong, I never said what you claim. But the argument, as I've repeated over and over, is simple; what scientists publish is what matters. What they say in private Slack chats and emails is entirely irreleva
319.
▲
by
Zetice
3y ago
Mass of particulates isn't the issue, it's what the particulate actually is. The author makes a brief comment about this but then goes on to wholly ignore the vastly varying impacts of different kinds of pollution.
320.
▲
by
Zetice
3y ago
"Works on my Tesla."
321.
▲
by
Zetice
3y ago
I feel like you anonymously and uncredibly (no offense intended) saying "sounds legit" kind of ignores the problem being pointed out here...
322.
▲
by
Zetice
3y ago
I'm repeating myself because you're ignoring my point, as you lack a good argument to the contrary. These scientists have no standing to believe what they said in their Slack messages and in email, knew that, and only wrote what t
323.
▲
by
Zetice
3y ago
No, not more specifically between British and Dutch, between Americans and Black Americans. It's not ancient history, it's what happened to your parents grandparents.
324.
▲
by
Zetice
3y ago
I find it really confusing how you think that has to do with genetics...
325.
▲
by
Zetice
3y ago
The fact that you're not elaborating or correcting me demonstrates it isn't a straw man.
326.
▲
by
Zetice
3y ago
Not obtuse at all, just catching rhetorical trickery.
327.
▲
by
Zetice
3y ago
No you weren't, you were choosing to focus on a different category to which these people belonged in an ultimately non sequitur comment.
328.
▲
by
Zetice
3y ago
Neither, just someone who understands this issue better than you, apparently.
329.
▲
by
Zetice
3y ago
Oh, well yeah -- racists created these categories based on superficial observable traits that do end up being genetic (e.g. skin tone). That's true, but nothing else is. No other correlations can be made, and certainly "racial
330.
▲
by
Zetice
3y ago
No, it's a summarization of your argument, isn't it? This is a "squares and rectangles" argument... no wonder you think this is a stupid conversation! You also don't probably have to quote my entire comment.
More ›