YEwSdObPQT

6 ms·

1.
by YEwSdObPQT 5y ago
> No, it does not stop people from thinking that (and of course that is not what is made illegal). It stops them from publishing and spreading those thoughts, because that is what is actually made illegal No it doesn't stop that eit
2.
by YEwSdObPQT 5y ago
> Yeah well, or the opposite. No it isn't the opposite. Again the last 2 years has shown me by how government and media have responded to recent events proves it. I have seen rioters burn down a cities in the US and call them "
3.
by YEwSdObPQT 5y ago
I agree. I was playing devil's advocate to an extent. At the time Rails was the first modern MVC framework as we understand it. > Rails was highly productive,the problem is that the concept of the service makes scaling non-trivial.
4.
by YEwSdObPQT 5y ago
It ultimately depends at what scale. I think most people to be fair are talking about building a clone of what was present back in the mid 2000s. You could build a twitter clone that could handle a few hundred users in a few weeks with mode
5.
by YEwSdObPQT 5y ago
> Small amount? Yes. There is a small amount of these people in the Western world. I would estimate it as less than 1% of the total population. The state and the media want you to believe they are just waiting to crawl out of every crevi
6.
by YEwSdObPQT 5y ago
> That page is what I would definitely not characterize as a proper source Obfuscate the discussion with numbers when it entirely misses the point I was making. So I will spell it out for you. It is totally okay to bring into question th
7.
by YEwSdObPQT 5y ago
Small bit of additional JS defeats the point of doing it at all. The moment you end up having to go outside one of these things you end up with one problem or another. The fact of the matter is that you will always have to deal with HTML, C
8.
by YEwSdObPQT 5y ago
I am not a fan of these things. Much like big JavaScript frameworks whenever you need to do something outside of the mechanisms they provide things become very difficult very quickly and you still need to use JavaScript, HTML and CSS anyway
9.
by YEwSdObPQT 5y ago
> If removing threats of violence is considered censorship, then the word "censorship" has no meaning. Think about it: how does censorship really occur? Do governments cast a magic spell that makes it so that the words can&#x27
10.
by YEwSdObPQT 5y ago
Unless I am presented with some hard evidence (that isn't from the German state) then I find it hard to believe. It still doesn't justify curtailing individual liberties anyway.
11.
by YEwSdObPQT 5y ago
> So can "they" openly say, that they think, you deserve to be robbed and assaulted? Yes > And for the sake of it, let "them" be a famous antifa influencer, so you can expect that other people do as their influenc
12.
by YEwSdObPQT 5y ago
> If you the idea is crap and it proved that it's crap by leading to genocide why would we award it any protection? Lots of communists say that the Soviet Union wasn't "real communism". Yet I never hear the same outcr
13.
by YEwSdObPQT 5y ago
You are advocating for throwing the baby out with the bath water. > It's hard to seriously argue that this wouldn't happen, given Germany's post-WWII history. (Also I'm not sure why you're bringing up the 'l
14.
by YEwSdObPQT 5y ago
> You don't think, there are limits to the things I should be allowed to say about you? No. The only concession I would consider is a call to violence if there is an real and immediate threat . Not internet death threats. The secon
15.
by YEwSdObPQT 5y ago
> Do you really want people to stereotype all Germans as Nazis and Holocaust deniers? Because I'm pretty sure this is what would end up happening if the German government did not go to the trouble of explicitly banning these things,
16.
by YEwSdObPQT 5y ago
So you don't know?
17.
by YEwSdObPQT 5y ago
> It's ok because the thoughts they ban are not novel, they had their time and were thoroughly executed on. "Because it is not new it is okay". Sorry that isn't very convincing. The issue is that if you ban one set of
18.
by YEwSdObPQT 5y ago
> Yeah, like "all jews should be killed". Good thing. Do you think it stops them from thinking that? Because you made is illegal. It doesn't. > It prevents such things from being normalized and makes it harder for them
19.
by YEwSdObPQT 5y ago
So you are saying that the laws in place haven't worked?
20.
by YEwSdObPQT 5y ago
So you aren't allowed to speak freely and they are controlling what people can and can't wear? So they do deny freedom of speech and freedom of expression to people that the government doesn't like (in this case Neo-Nazis). T
21.
by YEwSdObPQT 5y ago
> It’s not the American way but I’m quite ok with Germany doing this. Why? Germany has literally criminalised thinking the wrong things and denies people to associate freely based on the things that they happen to think. It doesn't
22.
by YEwSdObPQT 5y ago
Maybe. I get your point. I saw the clip of her on Bill Marr's show that has been floating around. She has pushed back when it was safe to do so. The tide was already turning on that.
23.
by YEwSdObPQT 5y ago
It has been in a nose dive for "everyday" people. But there is a whole section of society where they are treated as minor celebrities. The number of those people are shrinking (thankfully) but they are sizable enough for some jour
24.
by YEwSdObPQT 5y ago
> This seems to be only about writing jobs. I don't think of those as "high status" apart from the wages, but maybe I'm alone here. You and I don't think of them as high status. However there is a proportion of p
25.
by YEwSdObPQT 5y ago
I am not sure what happend to twitter. However if you just want to browser twitter you can use a nitter instance (there are quite a few public instances). https://github.com/zedeus/nitter I use browser plugin that redi
26.
by YEwSdObPQT 5y ago
> I do agree with the author, that you should use the simplest tools you can get away with, but (text-files + jekyll + this + that) isnt just text files, as you say its a precarious stack no less complex than some software package or wha
27.
by YEwSdObPQT 5y ago
> Of course there's an objective standard. You look at the politicians, the judges, and look up their standard. It's gross (no pun intended) that one needs to do that, but AFAIK lawyers do that all the time. 1) No that isn&#x27
28.
by YEwSdObPQT 5y ago
>From what I understand, many states with voter id laws didn't do that, and in some cases only accepted forms of id that poor or black voters were less likely to have. When I was earning minimum wage when stacking shelves I managed
29.
by YEwSdObPQT 5y ago
> Preaching to the choir! I'd be surprised to find anyone on HN with an argument against writing your blog/book in markdown with vim. Time. Wordpress for the most part is WYSIWYG. With any of these static site generators I have
30.
by YEwSdObPQT 5y ago
One of the problems with text files and the philosophy of chaining little tools together to do something is that what usually happens is a rube gold-berg machine of little dependencies you have to manage to keep things working. I could spen

More ›