Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
YEwSdObPQT
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
31.
▲
by
YEwSdObPQT
5y ago
Yeah I misunderstood what you said.
32.
▲
by
YEwSdObPQT
5y ago
> While I can see some of the objections, it seems reasonable that a temporary restriction of freedom like that gets documented. Any temporary restriction will become permanent. They always tell people it is going to be "temporary&q
33.
▲
by
YEwSdObPQT
5y ago
Thanks for the information. I've seen Civil Asset Forfeiture discussed about before on message boards and couldn't remember for the life of what it was called. Civil Asset Forfeiture is just state sanctioned theft from what I can
34.
▲
by
YEwSdObPQT
5y ago
> As I understand it, you still need to identify yourself in countries without such an id, like the US or UK, for a lot of reasons, like when opening bank accounts, interacting with the state, etc. But without a national id card, this ca
35.
▲
by
YEwSdObPQT
5y ago
The idea that you would be required to have ID in your own country is horrid. In the UK you are not required to have any identification on you.
36.
▲
by
YEwSdObPQT
5y ago
That maybe correct. However even if was ten to hundred times the number it would not be a significant percentage.
37.
▲
by
YEwSdObPQT
5y ago
How disingenuous. All this tells me is that you don't have an argument against my position. If you are have an rebuttal, I am quite willing to hear it.
38.
▲
by
YEwSdObPQT
5y ago
The argument you have presented is a classic tactic that the state uses to justify censorship and its abuse of power. Present scary group of people and then use it to justify taking away everyone's rights. it is a nonsense because. F
39.
▲
by
YEwSdObPQT
5y ago
He says exactly what he would do. I am under no illusions of what these people are like (my step brother is affiliated with such groups). That does not mean his analysis of the free speech debate is incorrect If you are alluding to restrict
40.
▲
by
YEwSdObPQT
5y ago
I listened to a video from a guy who is most probably a white nationalist and most probably a fascist in the UK quite a while ago. While I find his view abhorrent he understands the free-speech debate better than anyone else. To paraphrase
41.
▲
by
YEwSdObPQT
5y ago
The cancel JRE movement has been going on for a long time. He has been attacked for years by the same people. He is competition (and an effective competition) to traditional news and media. They don't like that because he is a self mad
42.
▲
by
YEwSdObPQT
5y ago
> Joe became popular for inviting all kinds of guests and just letting them speak, I consider that to be a great boon to forming truly diverse audience, and I have no doubt he had it before spotify days/ He has been continuing to do
43.
▲
by
YEwSdObPQT
5y ago
What do you mean by "diverse core audience"? I literally mean a plurality of people. Also we don't need hard metrics to accept that podcast has broad appeal. Demanding data for what are obvious things is asinine. If it didn&#
44.
▲
by
YEwSdObPQT
5y ago
Some of the things that are said are crazy. I listen to a lot of podcasts because I listen to them while I work. A lot of the news shows will just cut up parts of an interviews to make it more controversial than it really is. It is really d
45.
▲
by
YEwSdObPQT
5y ago
> My opinion of him attracting more conservative (not just US by the way) audience is based on his antivax stance, which is very popular among them, and he seems to shoehorn this topic quite frequently in his recent episodes. I listen to
46.
▲
by
YEwSdObPQT
5y ago
> Or, for the last two years, Covid and only Covid. Like every other TV show, news papers, radio program because it has been a persistent feature of our lives for almost 2 years now. How is this a criticism? > And anyone who disagrees
47.
▲
by
YEwSdObPQT
5y ago
> find it hard to believe because up to this point you've made zero effort to offer any proof of that apart from 'trust me bro'. You and I both have no accurate metrics on his audience demographic. We are not privvy to it
48.
▲
by
YEwSdObPQT
5y ago
I was expecting such a reply. It is really frustrating talking to people with an attitude such as yours. He has a large inter-national audience and the number of people that have watched his podcast is in the 10s if not 100s of millions. Th
49.
▲
by
YEwSdObPQT
5y ago
I've not played with the OS myself but I occasionally watch a live stream and ask him questions. He talks through stuff off the cuff and you know he is a genuine dude.
50.
▲
by
YEwSdObPQT
5y ago
Because he has a sizeable inter-nation audience. If anyone has a sizeable inter-nation audience they will have all sorts of people listening to them. There is something in the region of 100s of millions of downloads. Joe mentioned it and ta
51.
▲
by
YEwSdObPQT
5y ago
No it isn't either. Micheal Malice (who had some episodes where he appeared removed) was unaware of them removing them until someone told him via Twitter. A lot of people aren't going to buy it was a mistake considering the timing
52.
▲
by
YEwSdObPQT
5y ago
A shock jock? Howard Stern was a shock jock. Have you ever watched Joe Rogan? He has a 3 hour conversation with a guest where he talks at lengths about pretty much anything he wants to ask them about. That isn't a shock jock!
53.
▲
by
YEwSdObPQT
5y ago
He isn't conservative leaning. He is pretty much a centre/centre-left anti-authoritarian. Plenty of people watch Joe Rogan that aren't conservatives. Most conservatives and people like myself who roughly describe themselves a
54.
▲
by
YEwSdObPQT
5y ago
The reason why there is an impression that Japan is more technically advanced is due to the high quality electronics that used to be produced in the 80s, 90s and early 2000s. If I bought a Panasonic, Sony or similar people knew it would wor
55.
▲
by
YEwSdObPQT
5y ago
> There’s a shakeup happening right now (Corbyn gone and Johnson likely to follow) but it’s way too early to tell how long it will take for faith to be restored. I was unemployed for 9 months (which drained me of my savings), couldn
56.
▲
by
YEwSdObPQT
5y ago
Maybe. I don't know the specifics of it. I was listening to a podcasts and they were explaining the general principle of how leveraging works with regards to Bitcoin. The point I was generally making is that more complicated tax laws n
57.
▲
by
YEwSdObPQT
5y ago
I've pretty much given up. I do contracts now and just run the wheels off the contract and then move on. There is no point being invested. If quality doesn't come from the top, you might as well be King Cnut telling the tide not t
58.
▲
by
YEwSdObPQT
5y ago
Do you know how you don't pay capital gains tax? You leverage your assets and are given credit. That way you don't need to sell the assets to make use of them. Guess who typically does this? The very wealthy. Guess who doesn'
59.
▲
by
YEwSdObPQT
5y ago
> E: We do have other places we could do this work, but just not as cheaply as we can do it here, by inconveniencing the local population for days by removing their bridge No not really. My father works for a company that builds large ya
60.
▲
by
YEwSdObPQT
5y ago
The GUI could be set back to classic Windows quite quickly. There was also the Zune, Royale and Royale Dark (unofficially leaked IIRC) themes that looked nice. XP 64bit (for x64 machines) however was the best Windows OS I've ever used.
More ›