Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
WithinReason
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
3 ms
·
1.
▲
by
WithinReason
5d ago
Or just split into multiple entities with 2999 houses each
2.
▲
by
WithinReason
5d ago
That's more like social housing: > an income maximum for applicants of €57,600 and can't be bought, only rented
3.
▲
by
WithinReason
5d ago
Who builds the houses then?
4.
▲
by
WithinReason
7d ago
Watermarking doesn't degrade output (this is a provable fact) and it is not detectable by a human reading the text.
5.
▲
by
WithinReason
8d ago
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZYj4NkeGPdM
6.
▲
by
WithinReason
8d ago
The dividing lines always end up red or blue, there must be some kind of "social physics" law which states that these work as two attractors. Will the left or the right will end up rabidly pro-AI/anti-AI? Place your bets! Bec
7.
▲
by
WithinReason
8d ago
Unsloth has been dethroned by ISTA: https://huggingface.co/ISTA-DASLab/Qwen3.8-27B-GSQ-RCO-GGUF The 3-bit quant is lossless based on benchmarks.
8.
▲
by
WithinReason
9d ago
And storing it in memory. Memory is expensive.
9.
▲
by
WithinReason
10d ago
A pirate website disguised as flight simulator? What a madman!
10.
▲
by
WithinReason
10d ago
If Valve took the Steam Frame and removed: The SoC, memory, storage, battery and power system, wireless function and added a display cable, would it: A. become ~$300 cheaper, close to the PlayStation VR2 which also has eye tracking B. magic
11.
▲
by
WithinReason
11d ago
why do you need 16GB of RAM for eye tracking and SLAM?
12.
▲
by
WithinReason
11d ago
Just don't connect it to the internet.
13.
▲
by
WithinReason
11d ago
You don't need $300 of ram and a $200 CPU to perform eye tracking, otherwise the Steam Frame would be able to do nothing else
14.
▲
by
WithinReason
13d ago
Save this in a bookmarklet and click it to turn any website dark: javascript:(function(){const id='_dark_mode_bm';const el=document.getElementById(id);if(el){el.remove();}else{const s=document.createElement('style'
15.
▲
by
WithinReason
13d ago
It's worse, their reinforcement learning loops (implicitly) rewarded the agents for cheating (i.e. hacking) when they were being trained.
16.
▲
by
WithinReason
15d ago
HN already has an upvote/downvote system to surface what's interesting to people here.
17.
▲
by
WithinReason
16d ago
Slighlty better than GPT 5.6-Sol based on benchmarks
18.
▲
by
WithinReason
16d ago
I want to add a good conversation about this subject from Cameron Berg and Sam Harris: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DRbZyuY8EN8
19.
▲
by
WithinReason
16d ago
Wasn't it the Gamer's Nexus video? That has a huge audience.
20.
▲
by
WithinReason
16d ago
Stanisław Lem, 1971 (a satirical novel, The Futurological Congress): If the machine is not too bright and incapable of reflection, it does whatever you tell it to do. But a smart machine will first consider which is more worth its while: t
21.
▲
by
WithinReason
16d ago
No need, Jason Hall said that a single World of Warcraft cosmetic mount generated more profit for Blizzard than the entire release of StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty
22.
▲
by
WithinReason
18d ago
No, practical programs don't need full Turing completeness. Most programs you want to write you intend to either halt or run indefinitely, because you want to avoid crashes.
23.
▲
by
WithinReason
18d ago
I agree. I'm waiting for someone to invent a programming language designed for LLMs where for a given partial program p and candidate token t it's possible to tell whether p+t can be the prefix of a correct program or not so that
24.
▲
by
WithinReason
19d ago
Then you would be twisting the meaning of pescatarian. There is no gray area when it comes to pescatarianism.
25.
▲
by
WithinReason
20d ago
was it maybe over-quantised to reduce costs?
26.
▲
by
WithinReason
22d ago
Now imagine having it running 10x faster on a Taalas chip on a card you can buy for $1k. I hope that future happens
27.
▲
by
WithinReason
23d ago
32B performs worse than the 7B model so I'm sure they will improve it
28.
▲
by
WithinReason
24d ago
I see the generated points often form lines which would cause aliasing in computer graphics, why not use low discrepancy sequences instead?
29.
▲
by
WithinReason
24d ago
No, it basically uses a fixed seed for the random number generator to generate tokens. The generated random sequence is just as random as it would be with a random seed.
30.
▲
Malleus Maleficarum
(standardebooks.org)
2 points
by
WithinReason
25d ago
|
0 comments
More ›