Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
WendyTheWillow
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
WendyTheWillow
3y ago
You've said over and over again how you don't want to talk about the subject, yet you keep replying. I'm just making sure people understand this isn't the strategy of someone who knows what they're talking about,
2.
▲
by
WendyTheWillow
3y ago
Morality is what separates us from animals. The suggestion right and wrong don’t exist is the real tyranny. It's what evil people say to do evil things.
3.
▲
by
WendyTheWillow
3y ago
This isn’t a debate, this is me getting you to reveal how little weight you have behind what you believe. This is useful because if anyone else reads this, they will get a pretty standard idea of how people who think like you can’t really j
4.
▲
by
WendyTheWillow
3y ago
That’s true, but it’s not what I said. It seems like you may need to reread what I wrote in order to respond to it, but then again it’s probably easier for you to pretend to misunderstand me than it is to actually address what I’ve written
5.
▲
by
WendyTheWillow
3y ago
But you seem utterly incapable of justifying those beliefs to others... Your beliefs are worthless to everyone else if you can't explain them, and no all you've done so far is declare what you believe to be correct, and have cru
6.
▲
by
WendyTheWillow
3y ago
"Because I believe differently than you, there isn't much to discuss." is a terrible way to convince others of your belief. You're presupposing your conclusion and seem completely closed to the idea that you may be wrong
7.
▲
by
WendyTheWillow
3y ago
No, what I disagree with is his inconsistency, and also his manipulatability by the Russians, who allegedly told him a nuclear war would erupt if he didn't do what they said. What's to stop someone else from otherwise manipulating
8.
▲
by
WendyTheWillow
3y ago
A better comment would attempt to explain why is my point. Thus far, you've been insistent on refusing to explain yourself or being open to alternative views.
9.
▲
by
WendyTheWillow
3y ago
I couldn't disagree more strongly; you will screw this up if you roll your own. The only secure option is to push as much as possible outside of your infrastructure. The concerns that it won't be "auditable" or that
10.
▲
by
WendyTheWillow
3y ago
That’s even worse! I would try to avoid a library with a function that fragile.
11.
▲
by
WendyTheWillow
3y ago
Where did I suggest such a thing? And everything discussed is consent driven anyway. It’s not like a smart phone is mandated.
12.
▲
by
WendyTheWillow
3y ago
…the whole thread you’re replying to is about it not actually being necessary. To participate in this conversation you either accept that premise or disagree with it, passing it as a given is not really an option for the argument.
13.
▲
by
WendyTheWillow
3y ago
Or use a library that doesn’t modify the input…
14.
▲
by
WendyTheWillow
3y ago
The smell here is in the library, is the commenter's point. The solution would be to search for a better written library.
15.
▲
by
WendyTheWillow
3y ago
You can genuinely believe something insulting. And for what it's worth, I don't think you genuinely believe this. It's much more likely you're using a pathos appeal, as your logos argument has failed, which I'm te
16.
▲
by
WendyTheWillow
3y ago
That's your choice! But suggesting everyone operate on a substantially less convenient basis due to your specific desires for privacy seems... selfish.
17.
▲
by
WendyTheWillow
3y ago
I’m so far left wanting for an app that gives me a way to easily track and consume newly published work of a given topic. The existing apps are not great, and maybe this change will make it easier to provide better “reader” views, and poss
18.
▲
by
WendyTheWillow
3y ago
What percent of users would agree with you, in your estimation?
19.
▲
by
WendyTheWillow
3y ago
I opt in to Apple’s work, whereas Beeper Mini was done on my behalf, which is the striking difference.
20.
▲
by
WendyTheWillow
3y ago
I actually read a whole book on the weaponization of human rights, and how some groups portray their cause as “noble” to get around the sticky questions such as motive and self-benefit. I’m not saying this exactly that, but there’s a lot o
21.
▲
by
WendyTheWillow
3y ago
You want to change your location in every app manually, even when your device has a GPS receiver installed?
22.
▲
by
WendyTheWillow
3y ago
The telescope in question was at one point the proposed Sentinel [0] (apparently now the NEO Surveyor [1]), and frankly, even for something like that, I simply don't trust Elon because of its purpose. SpaceX has a stench about it that
23.
▲
by
WendyTheWillow
3y ago
People who got into tech because they're bad at human interaction will find no refuge working professionally. You're a burden to your company and your coworkers if you're in a role that requires coordination and you refuse t
24.
▲
by
WendyTheWillow
3y ago
I'm in school full time, so no. The problem isn't that managers need to be able to check on employees, it's that everyone needs to be able to interact with one another face-to-face to optimally work, and when they can't,
25.
▲
by
WendyTheWillow
3y ago
Electrons can't yet sufficiently replicate the full experience of being in person for teams that still intend on having both, and what the electrons can't cover will be covered by someone, and that tends to be on someone who has
26.
▲
by
WendyTheWillow
3y ago
For companies that were previously set up as in-person, it's the only way to operate successfully for any role that has any regular interaction.
27.
▲
by
WendyTheWillow
3y ago
It's more like the constant coordination of disparate people, keeping those people motivated and aligned, making sure they're getting full access to all of the resources that would be otherwise trivial to provide to people collect
28.
▲
by
WendyTheWillow
3y ago
This has nothing to do with my situation; I'm currently a full time student. My observation is in general, not about any specific situation. Remote work has costs, and your leaders have decided those costs are better than the in-per
29.
▲
by
WendyTheWillow
3y ago
Sorry but ancient Egyptians absolutely had dedicated workspaces separate from their homes. Obviously these places were more proximate to their homes insofar as their transportation methods limited the reasonable distances their workplaces
30.
▲
by
WendyTheWillow
3y ago
Oh well if it's formal , that suddenly makes it totally okay and therefore nobody is paying for you to do that in extra effort... My point is that in situations like yours, there's always a loser, and they often don't get a
More ›