Sure, just ignore everything else you typed. That seems reasonable. "Explanation of a problem" even here you're showing of what I've accused you of. You have a

Sure, just ignore everything else you typed. That seems reasonable. "Explanation of a problem" even here you're showing of what I've accused you of. You have a problem. HN doesn't seem to have a problem. WSJ doesn't seem to have a problem. But you're phrasing it like it's something objectively wrong. It's not a problem it's your problem. You don't like something and you want it a different way. That's fine. But adding all of this shit about them being abusive, obnoxious, calling them ridiculous; shows that no, you don't just want something to be a certain way you think that there's a failure on someones part if it isn't. Now you appear to be trying to what, back peddle in to the part of disinterested bystander? At least own up to your sense of entitlement. It's as defensible of a position as any other. EDIT: dispassionate in your hatred of those with whom you disagree. Hatred is what you're getting from this? Yeah this isn't going anywhere.