Timwi

94 ms·

841.
by Timwi 4y ago
> What you're asking for isn't entirely possible for local installs. The project I linked to does it, so it's clearly possible. I didn't ask for speed, I only ask to be able to run it at all.
842.
by Timwi 4y ago
This is propaganda. I do not need to escape the question because the answer to it is obvious. UBI should be paid for by those people who, at the moment, pay for devastating wars and coups (e.g. Afghanistan), bailouts of banks and megacorps,
843.
by Timwi 4y ago
Sounds awesome! Unfortunately, it says that it requires a GPU. Please consider making it accessible to people without a GPU, for example using OpenVino like this (command line only) project does: https://github.com/bes-dev&#
844.
by Timwi 4y ago
I definitely agree with the sentiment, but I think project maintainers need to see this post more than users do. I've been a user for a long time (I didn't just turn on a computer for the first time in my life). I see issues with
845.
by Timwi 4y ago
Same here, and it baffles me how people don't immediately want this when they see it on my screen.
846.
by Timwi 4y ago
This needs more moderation. I searched for “Dijkstra” and got many separate results with only one implementation each, despite presumably being the same algorithm.
847.
by Timwi 4y ago
Am I the only one who's tired of these types of news articles that describe an exciting-sounding possible, hypothetical future innovation and present it as if it were already here? We've heard the same about “clean” nuclear power,
848.
by Timwi 4y ago
> the model can be seen as a direct threat to their livelihoods. When is somebody going to point out that this isn't Stable Diffusion’s fault, but capitalism’s? Why are we willing to stifle innovation for this instead of first makin
849.
by Timwi 4y ago
The article is extremely sparse on the results/findings of the experiments :(
850.
by Timwi 4y ago
It would help motivation to have some allies though.
851.
by Timwi 4y ago
When I see something like that, I tend to assume that some people use speech recognition to write comments. (No idea if that was the case here.)
852.
by Timwi 4y ago
Love the idea and the project! However, if you are aiming to become popular, definitely the first thing you need is a better name than “Mwmbl”.
853.
by Timwi 4y ago
The author is not going to be able to convince governments to fund it unless they can first demonstrate a viable service.
854.
by Timwi 4y ago
It doesn't matter what you call it. It doesn't look like a button to the vast majority of non-techies. That makes it a dark pattern.
855.
by Timwi 4y ago
> our innovative Click Beacon™. Ambiki's Click Beacon™ allows the therapist to visually see where on their screen the patient clicks Innovative? Really? TeamViewer and AnyDesk have both had that feature for a long time, and they are
856.
by Timwi 4y ago
Coming In
857.
by Timwi 4y ago
My approach was to try to write a bunch of cryptic clues of my own. That way I got more practiced at recognizing the various wordplay indicators.
858.
by Timwi 4y ago
PBS Space Time did a piece on that. https://youtu.be/msVuCEs8Ydo
859.
by Timwi 4y ago
Let's call it an even 7:20
860.
by Timwi 4y ago
One does not need to want for it to be universally legal to point out that the wording of the 1st amendment technically implies that it is.
861.
by Timwi 4y ago
or tachyons (“fast”). What, what do you mean they don't exist?
862.
by Timwi 4y ago
Can't speak for others, but I don't want to strengthen copyright at all, I want to strengthen copyleft: anyone should be able to make something like Copilot, but nobody should be allowed to hoard it to themselves and charge money
863.
by Timwi 4y ago
I stopped reading where they lamented grammatical errors and then proceeded to write “queue” when they obviously meant cue .
864.
by Timwi 4y ago
... No? Are you offended by the abbreviation tldr?
865.
by Timwi 4y ago
It depends on what you need. In most cases the code on StackOverflow is not exactly what you need, so you need to understand it in order to adapt it. But if you're looking for a specific well-defined algorithm (MD5, say) then you can j
866.
by Timwi 4y ago
It's remarkable how many people still repeat this unsubstantiated cliché.
867.
by Timwi 4y ago
Convenient, isn't it? As a consumer, it's quite obvious to me too how it benefits only the writer/creator at the detriment of everyone else.
868.
by Timwi 4y ago
I hope you will still include the faster, more straightforward mode for those who want it. Otherwise this is another example of catering for the common denominator and giving techies the increased impression that all software is dumbed down
869.
by Timwi 4y ago
ELI5?
870.
by Timwi 4y ago
I translated QBasic Nibbles to C# and it runs in a modern console window. https://github.com/Timwi/CsNibbles

More ›