Timon3

49 ms·

841.
by Timon3 3y ago
Are you trolling? If not, could you explain how "main" specifically implies a patriarchal hierarchy? It may imply a hierarchy, but I have no idea where "patriarchal" comes from.
842.
by Timon3 3y ago
A lower risk in one specific disease is a far cry from "not so harmful". Do you have any specific studies pointing towards 1-4 cigarettes significantly reducing the risk of emphysema compared to 5+?
843.
by Timon3 3y ago
> (edit - I may add the product probably wouldn't be so harmful if people kept their consumption to under five cigarettes a day.) Even 1-4 cigarettes per day is very harmful: > Results: Adjusted relative risk (95% confidence inte
844.
by Timon3 3y ago
"Realistic" is the wrong word, since that's what infill models are already doing, and the word is already used for that. You'd have to find something that differentiates between plausibly realistic and contextual realist
845.
by Timon3 3y ago
Until either of us finds studies on this topic it's meaningless speculation, because I honestly can't imagine more accidents, even initially, if things are done as they should be.
846.
by Timon3 3y ago
I would expect fewer safety issues, since learnings from previous years can be taken into account during design, which isn't easy to do in existing factories.
847.
by Timon3 3y ago
> Isn't there any value in having variance in the generated responses? Sure, which is why the technique is used. But that doesn't mean "random" is a useful descriptor. I, as a human, try to add variance to my response
848.
by Timon3 3y ago
They are only probabilities if you treat them as such. If you always just pick the highest probability option (temperature = 0), it's not random in any way - then it's just a confidence value. You can use randomness, but it's
849.
by Timon3 3y ago
How is the selected token "random" if it's chosen based on weighted probabilities, especially if you use a temperature of 0?
850.
by Timon3 3y ago
You cannot be "opted in" by someone else. Only you can opt-in or opt-out.
851.
by Timon3 3y ago
What about Half Life: Alyx? Not just original, but pretty revolutionary for the platform.
852.
by Timon3 3y ago
I think that often times this is circular reasoning: - no reasonable person would be against this - capitalists are successful, so they must be reasonable - capitalists are against this => they must be against this for good reasons, sinc
853.
by Timon3 3y ago
First off: it seems like the many employees at Twitter did have a positive impact on the company, considering the many issues it has been facing since this was reduced. I know that it was a common refrain that Twitter was completely over-st
854.
by Timon3 3y ago
> I think no one would _really_ object to labelling like oatmeal healthier than chips. Chip manufacturers certainly would (and do). They pay money to politicians to keep these regulations away, and they pay money to media to stir up a co
855.
by Timon3 3y ago
You'd probably have to combine this with segmenting and generative infill for the background layers, but luckily there's been a lot of progress there!
856.
by Timon3 3y ago
Ah, that is indeed a big difference. Thank you for clarifying!
857.
by Timon3 3y ago
> There is, but not nearly as restrictive. Stores can be open from at least 6 to 20 any day of the week other than Sunday I just looked up the corresponding law for Austria, and they are allowed to open from 6 to 21 on weekdays, and 6 to
858.
by Timon3 3y ago
For reference, this is the output: WITH table_1 AS ( SELECT customer_id, total, total - 0.8 AS _expr_0 FROM invoices WHERE invoice_date >= DATE '1970-01-16' ),
859.
by Timon3 3y ago
It is! One suggestion to make it even more convincing: I'd love to see the SQL statement it compiles to.
860.
by Timon3 3y ago
If that is indeed their policy, there must surely be some example of just this happening before these strikes, right?
861.
by Timon3 3y ago
It's definitely possible! Even more so considering Sebastian also started a Coding Challenge for Tiny Chess Bots: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iScy18pVR58
862.
by Timon3 3y ago
This is illustrated very well in Sebastian Lague's video "Coding Adventure: Making a Better Chess Bot" ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_vqlIPDR2TU ).
863.
by Timon3 3y ago
> I was really expecting better comments from hackernews. You really shouldn't on topics related to the EU. There is an incredible amount of misinformation peddled, and asking for sources or actual analysis beyond simple statements
864.
by Timon3 3y ago
And my point is: you make 1$ in revenue, and it's possible for you to owe more than 1$ to Unity. That is the problem with the per-install fee, and it's the reason it's not comparable with a cut of revenue.
865.
by Timon3 3y ago
> I think you don't understand what revenue is. It's entirely possible for a revenue based percentage system where you lose money on every sale. In that sense this system is the same - under some circumstances you can lose mone
866.
by Timon3 3y ago
> If your small paid game goes viral = you pay a small fee per install, but since you are making money on these sales this is functionality identical to perfentage of revenue(please convince me otherwise) and I don't see the problem
867.
by Timon3 3y ago
No, it applies to all games. Say you publish an iOS game for 1$, and a user installs it on two devices which he replaces after a couple of years - you'll owe Unity more money than you took in from the sale.
868.
by Timon3 3y ago
> I think dev tools should be provided for free or cheap to people experimenting or starting out, but there is a point where people are taking the piss if they sell 200k copies and they still think they should be able to use the tools fo
869.
by Timon3 3y ago
> If you consider the IOS app store, where the minimum price is $0.99 and they take a maximum of 30% (including all payment fees etc), that still leaves you with at least $0.49 per extra copy sold. This is assuming that all users only in
870.
by Timon3 3y ago
That's the thing: it's not possible to answer this question, since the cut Unity gets is not tied to the revenue of the developer anymore. You pay per user install. In the absolute worst case of people trying to abuse this structu

More ›