Timon3

58 ms·

871.
by Timon3 3y ago
They just changed your initial quote! "Q: If a user reinstalls/redownloads a game / changes their hardware, will that count as multiple installs? A: We are not going to charge a fee for reinstalls. The spirit of this program
872.
by Timon3 3y ago
> You do know we have the technology for wireless data transfer already? And it has even been standardized! Yes, and it's not as fast as cable-based data transfers, and it is not part of wireless charging technology. Do you even rea
873.
by Timon3 3y ago
> What’s the model? I’ll be calling the EU so they force all the manufacturers to support the qi charging standard that is actually useful. You know that USB-C isn't just charging, but also data transfer, right? I'd be up for t
874.
by Timon3 3y ago
Ah, gotcha! Absolutely, as we've seen with USB-C.
875.
by Timon3 3y ago
> It all looks really nice, until you start wading through the dredge of fast charging, thunderbolt, displaylink over USB-c and whatever they’ll add in the future. Show me a standard with this many features without these problems. > B
876.
by Timon3 3y ago
I'm not sure what you're trying to say.
877.
by Timon3 3y ago
Even if it only increases the supply by 30% it might be a massive help. The raw number isn't as important as the distribution. If all the charging stations currently are in hotspots, rural areas don't benefit from them. But rural
878.
by Timon3 3y ago
As far as I can see, both the USB standard and the standardization of charging plugs have been a massive success. Do you remember back when literally every phone had a different charger and plug? I don't see how that was good for the
879.
by Timon3 3y ago
> Are you sure about this? It it is not explicitly written somewhere it is not mandatory to use USB-C. There has to be some documents stating the exact name USB-C or the designated standard codes etc. how can this be enforced otherwise?
880.
by Timon3 3y ago
You are mistaken, the industry is free to innovate and decide on a better standard together. USB-C isn't written into the legislation.
881.
by Timon3 3y ago
It absolutely happens, I don't know how you're not familiar with it: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanepe/article/PIIS2666-7...
882.
by Timon3 3y ago
And as usual, the saying is BS - I was able to find an online shop selling the stuff to private people in Germany in a few seconds.
883.
by Timon3 3y ago
That might just mean that life is rare, but inevitably becomes advanced.
884.
by Timon3 3y ago
In which places with droughts have we used weather manipulation to reduce climate change? I'm not talking about increasing rainfall, I'm talking about reducing climate change . Please share a specific example where we've don
885.
by Timon3 3y ago
Really? How have we been manipulating the weather to reduce climate change since the 80s?
886.
by Timon3 3y ago
Hypothetically my initial point stands: reducing fossil fuel consumption by replacing it with something else, and artificially manipulating the weather, are in completely different ballparks regarding danger. What are you trying to argue
887.
by Timon3 3y ago
That's the neat thing about hypotheticals: they let us talk about and consider situations which aren't real. I can say crazy, insane things which have no basis in reality without said things affecting reality in a negative way! It
888.
by Timon3 3y ago
And I thought I was adequately clear when I initially specified: > Nothing bad will happen if we suddenly stopped all fossil fuel consumption and replaced it with renewable energy. Do you really need me to repeat this for every subsequ
889.
by Timon3 3y ago
> The whole point is that it is hard/impossible to predict But it certainly seems much easier to predict compared to the results of further CO2 in the atmosphere. We've lived through the transition period from lower CO2 to curr
890.
by Timon3 3y ago
Yes, if you change the parameters of my hypothetical, the results change. What's your point?
891.
by Timon3 3y ago
It seems reasonable to me to assume that nothing bad would happen if we stopped fossil fuel consumption right now. The ecosystems on our planet have only had fossil fuel emissions added for around 200 years, and in that time these emissions
892.
by Timon3 3y ago
import VGG16, preprocess_input from keras.applications.vgg16 This approach has a couple of downsides: - no editor autocomplete while typing (JS modules have the same downside) - more difficult to read multiple imports from modules i
893.
by Timon3 3y ago
Studies seem to indicate that the cattle industry produces somewhere between 11% and 17% of global greenhouse emissions: https://thebreakthrough.org/issues/food-agriculture-environm... How do you get from that to less
894.
by Timon3 3y ago
But let's be fair - "reducing fossil fuel consumption" and "artificial weather manipulation" are on completely different levels in regards to dangers. Nothing bad will happen if we suddenly stopped all fossil fuel c
895.
by Timon3 3y ago
Generally speaking it's never a good idea to stoke the fire of unfounded fears in people. Doing so directly leads to stochastic terrorism and other horrible things. There are more important things in this world than money. Surely we ca
896.
by Timon3 3y ago
That's probably because it was cached! The first install is "a lot" slower than subsequent ones: $ cd /tmp/ $ mkdir app1 && cd app1 $ time bun install react bun add v1.0.0 (822a00c4) installe
897.
by Timon3 3y ago
I've seen a couple of critiques on it, and they all seem to be well-founded. How do you differentiate between "decided before it even came out that they didn't like it" and "have real grievances that support their v
898.
by Timon3 3y ago
I mean, I'm running on incredible amounts of highly complex physics and maths, but that doesn't mean I can give you the correct answer to all questions on those.
899.
by Timon3 3y ago
The syntax is vanilla, but not the semantics. Kinda makes it seem like malicious compliance.
900.
by Timon3 3y ago
>> There's a lot of magic and complexity hiding in there. > That's kind of the point. But it goes against the title of this post: "You Don't Need to “Learn” Svelte: Embracing the Simplicity of JavaScript".

More ›