Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Timon3
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
33 ms
·
541.
▲
by
Timon3
2y ago
Isn't this the same situation that any codebase faces when one thinks about open sourcing it? I can't legally open source the code I don't own.
542.
▲
by
Timon3
2y ago
It's a watch many people already used and very much enjoyed, so it should be understandable that people are excited about it making a return. I'm not aware of any other watch that fills the same niche (open & extendable, e-ink
543.
▲
by
Timon3
2y ago
I really enjoyed my Pebble for waking up in the morning (vibration feels much softer to me than a loud alarm) and media control, e.g. while showering. The display read well passively, and I only had to charge it every couple of days. The on
544.
▲
by
Timon3
2y ago
You're right, sorry.
545.
▲
by
Timon3
2y ago
Maybe I'm unaware of previous comments, but this user neither called Musk a Zionist nor an "anti-Jewish Nazi", so why ask him to answer for other people?
546.
▲
by
Timon3
2y ago
If you don't mind me asking: what do you hope to achieve with your approach to discussion? You're throwing around insults, bad faith replies and fallacies left and right. No matter what your motivations are, you would convince mor
547.
▲
by
Timon3
2y ago
I think you know that it's not about one still photo, but about the whole gesture. In case you're acting in good faith and didn't know: it's about the whole gesture. If you want to argue that politicians have made the sa
548.
▲
by
Timon3
2y ago
> You want it to be a Nazi salute, that is all I hear. That's fine with me, but you should be aware that you're breaking the site guidelines in doing so: "Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what so
549.
▲
by
Timon3
2y ago
I won't go and find counter examples, because a) I disagree that he was just "flailing around" (you can literally see him tense up), and b) I disagree that the Nazi salute requires some specific level of upper body stiffness.
550.
▲
by
Timon3
2y ago
[flagged]
551.
▲
by
Timon3
2y ago
Reporting in with my experience with JetBrains IDEs - they are generally OK, but the quality has gone massively down over the last couple of years (some worse than others, Rider has been okay, though new features often just don't work
552.
▲
by
Timon3
2y ago
To add to your (excellent) points, he only started tweeting about peace once it was obvious the plan (interrupting the certification to use "alternate slates") had failed. Of course he would share a "call for peace" at
553.
▲
by
Timon3
2y ago
Musk isn't Twitters CEO, he's the CTO.
554.
▲
by
Timon3
2y ago
Sure! Yet creators choose to censor themselves in similar ways to keep ad revenue coming in.
555.
▲
by
Timon3
2y ago
While there aren't direct speech restrictions in platforms like YouTube, you're leaving out the crucial detail that mentioning words like "suicide" gets your video demonetized, which directly causes similar self-censorsh
556.
▲
by
Timon3
2y ago
> You have to move all installations to the new domain, but you don't have to do that in 1 day. YES, YOU DO! At least you have to move the majority of all installations day 1. I don't know why you keep repeating this. Matt stea
557.
▲
by
Timon3
2y ago
You are still ignoring the point I've brought up repeatedly: those who move first have the most to lose. You act like moving gradually has no danger for the plugin authors. You've moved 5% of plugins over. Whoops, Matt stole the
558.
▲
by
Timon3
2y ago
Why are you talking about weather, when the topic is climate? You're either fundamentally misunderstanding the topic, or you're deliberately misrepresenting the article to prove some point, presumably climate change denial.
559.
▲
by
Timon3
2y ago
If you could move all WP plugins & plugin developers to a different domain at once, sure, there's no problem! But unless you have a magic wand, this won't happen. Then the question is: can you move enough at once to clear th
560.
▲
by
Timon3
2y ago
You're completely ignoring that the individuals have a high risk when doing this, even more so when they are the first to take this step. It can often happen that individuals make choices to minimize risk, which lead to increased risk
561.
▲
by
Timon3
2y ago
No, that's not the "stealing" I'm referring to. Instead of guessing what I could mean, just read my response to the person who first asked what I mean with "stealing".
562.
▲
by
Timon3
2y ago
Did you look at the other comments, where someone asks the same question, and I give an answer?
563.
▲
by
Timon3
2y ago
No, that's not how consent and preferences work. If someone has power over a group of individuals, and that group doesn't act due to threats, it's not confirming that they want to be controlled by that someone.
564.
▲
by
Timon3
2y ago
While I can understand that in many cases, the examples in this article are good ones in my eyes. A good news article should cover more than the bare minimum, and all the examples you brought up aren't manipulative in my eyes, since th
565.
▲
by
Timon3
2y ago
Just scraping the site isn't quite enough. You'd also have to fork Wordpress to be able to use a plugin directory not under Matt's control, which is important for the average admin to quickly patch security-relevant issues. B
566.
▲
by
Timon3
2y ago
Matt's company will fork your project, replace your original plugin listing and claim all your reviews as theirs, while also stopping you from distributing security updates to force people to switch to their fork. Imagine if you make y
567.
▲
by
Timon3
2y ago
The first people to take this step will most likely have their plugins stolen, just as Matt did with ACF. This means taking this step is a massive danger for the first contributors - those with the highest impact are those with the most to
568.
▲
by
Timon3
2y ago
Maybe I'm missing or misunderstanding something, but isn't this a criticism you can levy against most news articles that describe events? These seem to be factual descriptions as well as descriptions of ought-statements and -posit
569.
▲
by
Timon3
2y ago
> I am unconvinced that people have a stronger affiliation for those than their country. Why is the affiliation the relevant axis? Why not indirect political power (unions strongest) or direct political power (regions strongest)? You
570.
▲
by
Timon3
2y ago
> Because it is at the country level that people corporate on international problems. It's also at the union level that people corporate on international problems, arguably more so than on the country level. Yet the largest differen
More ›