TeMPOraL

4 ms·

61.
by TeMPOraL 6d ago
Can we unbury the lede here? Did Jeffrey survive ? "such care, or lack thereof" is heavily loaded; about the only objectively-sounding statements in the last paragraph are that Jeffrey wasn't able to tolerate anesthetics, an
62.
by TeMPOraL 6d ago
How? Did limbic system evolve as "fear of death" or "peer recognition and perception of shared fate" system? (Not doubting the chicken nuggets, just wondering about the lower/simpler end of the scale.)
63.
by TeMPOraL 6d ago
You mean serving inference? There are people who think self-hosted or embedded models will win in the end, but that's an incredibly naive take, oblivious to the simple fact of reality: Whatever you can do locally, the big vendors can d
64.
by TeMPOraL 6d ago
Sounds like this would fix so many problems with cars today, simply by making car ownership something to be dreaded, not desired. From traffic jams and traffic accidents, to car-dependent neighborhoods and cities - all solved by preventin
65.
by TeMPOraL 6d ago
It's playing out exactly as their hypotheticals, and they're still mocked and nobody is paying attention.
66.
by TeMPOraL 6d ago
That's correct in non-inverted world too.
67.
by TeMPOraL 6d ago
> In the end I dropped the idea because every other person was making it. There is already an alternative in comments here, in addition to submission itself. Obviously everyone is making it because of some joke on social media or somet
68.
by TeMPOraL 6d ago
Or that it won't just decide to take risks.
69.
by TeMPOraL 6d ago
Locomotive itself? Probably not. If you turned its abstract bounding box into real box - thin, negligible mass, enough strength not to break up - and evacuated the air inside, then yes, the box with locomotive in it should float.
70.
by TeMPOraL 7d ago
Not "not worth their time", but "that they cannot afford to solve".
71.
by TeMPOraL 7d ago
> Kids and Kittens are good examples of this behavior at the intelligent end of the spectrum: Given time, they'll find a way to get through any gap. They don't need to be as smart as the adults, the adults just need to turn th
72.
by TeMPOraL 7d ago
It does make some sense given they're positioning it as alternative to the normal way you'd implement such output shape, which is to slap a prompt on a frontier LLM and maybe run it in "constrained output" mode if you li
73.
by TeMPOraL 7d ago
I'd counter that AI usually writes way better than typical person, definitely way better than any commenters here (myself included). What's jarring about AI content is seeing the mastery of English applied in mundane contexts, w
74.
by TeMPOraL 7d ago
I didn't mean they first invented or described the methods, but that they've been consistently presenting a solid argument that these and other methods make airgapping and sandboxing AGI a dangerously flawed idea from the start. T
75.
by TeMPOraL 7d ago
It's not a bad attitude given that I don't trust it did the work right , so the more details it can include, the more opportunities I have to spot errors, which invalidate the whole result - and conversely, if all details seem ri
76.
by TeMPOraL 7d ago
FWIW, the "Significance" blurb at the very top says as much: > An interesting feature of the system is that all components of the system are at the same physical temperature, but it functions because they have different noise
77.
by TeMPOraL 7d ago
> "air gapping AI can't (hypothetically) work because it will figure out a way to basically morse code across the airgap" All things well-known for good two decades and written about by x-risk/LessWrong crowd, but t
78.
by TeMPOraL 7d ago
Probably not without a sufficiently powerful LLM from same family, or something equivalent, to act as a translation layer, which includes the risk of the translator lying to you .
79.
by TeMPOraL 7d ago
Not until it's convenient enough, then yes. Otherwise, explain Flutter.
80.
by TeMPOraL 7d ago
It is, because it includes the key words such as "ownership gate" and perhaps others, which makes it infinitely more informative than just "fix", by pointing at what was in scope, and what wasn't.
81.
by TeMPOraL 7d ago
The right way is to throw LLMs at building tools that reframe the problem into a shape LLMs are good at navigating, and then have LLMs use those tools to solve it.
82.
by TeMPOraL 7d ago
"Stealing" changes definitions every few years now, most recently with the mainstream suddenly deciding RIAA and news publishers are no longer the scum of the Earth but their new best friends, and reversing previous definition to
83.
by TeMPOraL 7d ago
I mean if you push it, all software you can get your hands on is open source, it's just that binary code is a bit tougher to read than the form it was compiled from. Also since you brought it up, I'd argue the difference between S
84.
by TeMPOraL 7d ago
Indeed this is one of the key problems here. If models start doing CoT in "neuralese", or use it when talking with each other, we lose what little observability we have.
85.
by TeMPOraL 7d ago
But that's on them, not on jargon. In fact, jargon is only "low resonance" until it isn't; plenty of key social and political issues resolve around jargon terms normies have no more fucking clue about now than before ,
86.
by TeMPOraL 7d ago
Software accessibility is bad for business - that's why it has to be legally mandated. There's no firm difference between "accessible", particularly to screen readers, and "amenable to end-user automation", and
87.
by TeMPOraL 7d ago
No, it's just AI growing so fast in every direction that people don't have time to pick up low-hanging fruits along the way. This is also a prime argument for why AI is not a bubble or dead-end: even if LLMs plateaued today, there
88.
by TeMPOraL 7d ago
Well, it puts people in a bind. The current status quo of TOTP 2FA with recovery codes is bad, but it's probably the best we have - because applying passkeys to your primary e-mail is beyond stupid at this point, it's putting yo
89.
by TeMPOraL 7d ago
You mean like, "assembled from two separate components"?
90.
by TeMPOraL 7d ago
Unfortunately none of the things you listed are what page vendors want you to have. They'd very much prefer you didn't. On the web, they're just too hard to prevent, so most don't bother.

More ›