Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Sylos
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
84 ms
·
751.
▲
by
Sylos
10y ago
It doesn't have as big of a modding ecosystem as Minecraft, simply because it doesn't have even a fraction of the community, but apart from size, I don't think I would agree on its modding ecosystem being less amazing. Minete
752.
▲
by
Sylos
10y ago
He's referring to including Google Fonts as font-face into your webpage, so that they are downloaded by each client from Google's server.
753.
▲
by
Sylos
10y ago
Yeah, but that's still plenty of webpages.
754.
▲
by
Sylos
10y ago
What he's saying is that this is not "humanity inventing something to make life better". It's a company inventing something to make money. And it's not a simple product like glasses where you pay with money and then
755.
▲
by
Sylos
10y ago
I also still don't understand why they never did anything more useful with it. For example, there's an XPosed module which let's you swipe to the right over the navigation keys to change them out for music controls. If you sw
756.
▲
by
Sylos
10y ago
> What qualifies as "new technology" by your high standards? Well, why don't we start at the standards that Google is advertising with? It's them who are acting like this is the best thing since sliced bread, while it
757.
▲
by
Sylos
10y ago
That wasn't really released last week. It's been in Firefox and default-enabled in Private Browsing for probably a year already. This just enables it in normal browsing as well, and they've only published it via Test Pilot fo
758.
▲
by
Sylos
10y ago
They do, yes. What you've linked is a browser with ad-blocking capabilities, which is treated a bit differently. What they remove are ad-blockers which block ads in other apps. And you can still get them on Android, but not via the Pla
759.
▲
by
Sylos
10y ago
He's saying preinstalled as the default browser. Not installed and set as default after the fact by the user. Let manufacturers freely decide what software they want to bundle.
760.
▲
by
Sylos
10y ago
Right. Do you really need someone to tell you that millions of people use and update Ubuntu regularly without typing in a cryptic 100 character long command or can you figure out yourself that it has to be you who's wrong here?
761.
▲
by
Sylos
10y ago
You're saying that, as if things would be alright, as long as the number of people who have no problem outweigh the number of people who have a problem.
762.
▲
by
Sylos
10y ago
Well, Google, Microsoft and Apple pull in several billion per year... And in 2014, Mozilla had expenses of 212 million for software development, so they definitely do invest most of their budget there. https://static.mozilla.com&
763.
▲
by
Sylos
10y ago
ChromeOS isn't on phones, is it? Ubuntu also doesn't really require terminal usage either way...
764.
▲
by
Sylos
10y ago
This app can do it: https://f-droid.org/repository/browse/?fdid=org.schabi.newpi...
765.
▲
by
Sylos
10y ago
Because why should it be? People are willing to pay for it. This is especially also the case, as Google could abuse some sentence in the YouTube API ToS, which prohibits the separation of audio and video, to get rid of third-party YouTube a
766.
▲
by
Sylos
10y ago
I've also found the offline use in Google Maps to be horribly unreliable. I had Google Maps set up with an offline map and, two times in a row, when I wanted to actually use it, the offline map had disappeared from my phone for whateve
767.
▲
by
Sylos
10y ago
I've heard a few times already that Google isn't actually making a revenue off of YouTube and rather just paying to keep it alive. No idea, if that's true, though. There's also the consideration that having a YouTube-acc
768.
▲
by
Sylos
10y ago
I personally use an RSS Reader to handle my "subscriptions". The YouTube-webpage also has an option to export your subscriptions to an OPML-file (which can then be imported into an RSS Reader): Log into your YouTube-account, then
769.
▲
by
Sylos
10y ago
They already have close to world domination. No need to reconsider anything at this point...
770.
▲
by
Sylos
10y ago
Right, but your comment made it sound like they would be experimenting with an Electron-based browser as a replacement for Firefox and that they were using WebKit on iOS voluntarily, which is both not true. You might not have meant it like
771.
▲
by
Sylos
10y ago
...why not just regular Ubuntu? Or well, any lightweight Linux distro, really. There's also this, in case that comes closer to what you see as ChromeOS competitor: https://cublinux.com/
772.
▲
by
Sylos
10y ago
I don't think that's a fair thing to say. To me, being able to trust that my distribution is giving me reasonable help by pre-selecting good applications, is a vital help for me using my computer. I don't have the time to go
773.
▲
by
Sylos
10y ago
How does it look bad for you? Or rather to say how does it look worse than Chrome, as both browsers do differ completely from the native toolkit... Well, unless you're using something like QupZilla or Konqueror, but then this blog post
774.
▲
by
Sylos
10y ago
Do you really think that if he would have been fired by Mozilla and then Mozilla had claimed at every corner that he resigned voluntarily, that he would have just accepted that, instead of going to the next media outlet and selling the true
775.
▲
by
Sylos
10y ago
Mozilla is currently working on this: https://hacks.mozilla.org/2016/09/introducing-debugger-html/
776.
▲
by
Sylos
10y ago
He stepped down himself...
777.
▲
by
Sylos
10y ago
No one ever held a press meeting and officially said that Chromium is supported by Chromecast (Chromium doesn't even officially exist as a product), but you could use Chromium with the Google Cast extension and it worked, anyways. So,
778.
▲
by
Sylos
10y ago
Yeah, you could cast with the Google Cast extension over Chromium. And it's generally believed that Google moved the Chromecast-functionality into Chrome and away from an extension to not necessarily lock out Chromium, but rather to lo
779.
▲
by
Sylos
10y ago
Someone already managed to break it. If I understood it correctly by somehow overwriting the ROM. That's not the point, though, as others have already said.
780.
▲
by
Sylos
10y ago
That's simply not true. They collect a ton of data which they wouldn't have to collect, if they wouldn't run advertisements or could even just delete this data much earlier. There's even crap like Android not allowing yo
More ›