SpeedilyDamage

10 ms·

61.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
You don't understand the take that just because ChatGPT can pass a coding interview doesn't mean the coding interview is useless or that ChatGPT could actually do the job? What part of that take do you not understand? It's a
62.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
What part did I miss?
63.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
So nothing at all to do with conservative voices being silenced, then. Why are we talking about them? You were asked for conservatives who were being silenced for saying conservative things, not generic times people got in trouble for say
64.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
Hm, so you don’t think comments should be related to one another?
65.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
Yes.
66.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
He isn’t saying you can’t do that, he’s saying if you do, people will wonder, which is risky. If you give them answers, even false ones, they’re less likely to wonder. It’s just tapping into the natural human curiosity, and you want to avo
67.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
I’ve said multiple times I cannot find the controversy you keep claiming happened to those two people, which to me speaks more loudly than the actual controversy they supposedly had.
68.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
…what do you think the title of this submission is?
69.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
No it’s not irrelevant; bias is good when it hinders horrible things and supports great things. This is an argument on the merits of specific biases, not an argument that all biases are bad; no person or group operates with the intention of
70.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
> These people were patently not doing anything reprehensible Says you. I say differently.
71.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
Okay? What I said still stands.
72.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
No, political affiliation does not have strong protections in CA, and OP is not arguably correct, as "protected status" is absolutely a term of art in law, and does not apply here. Besides, even if that were true, it's mora
73.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
Sure, the people are on Wikipedia, but the account of their controversy was not. Besides, what do any of these have to do with conservative views being suppressed?
74.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
What does any of this have to do with conservative views being censored?
75.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
1000% agree, just trying to understand the situation.
76.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
I definitely appreciate this, my understanding is probably lower than I let on, thank you for the info.
77.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
As far as I know all you can do is alter the input to manipulate the completion, there are no other parameters that ChatGPT accepts.
78.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
I think you’re missing the argument here for the red-team/blue-team stuff. Regardless of team, if someone says or does something reprehensible, it ought to be condemned. That’s what these people did, and seems like they’ve moved on fr
79.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
Can you name others? I literally could not find the controversies for the first two, and it doesn’t appear anything worse than being fired from Google has happened to James Damore.
80.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
> No, political affiliation is not a protected class in California. A bill that would have made it one failed to pass the state legislature in 2021. [0] Regardless, it shouldn’t be. [0] https://www.shouselaw.com/ca/b
81.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
It's just combining and synthesizing other works; it's not "deciding" anything, it's crafting responses that best match with what it already has. You can choose what to feed it as source material, but you can'
82.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
Hm, why? Political groups are not a protected status, you can move freely between them at a whim if you don't like how your views are treated.
83.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
The argument conservatives provide is the idea that they're overly censored on platforms; how permissively they're spoken of (hatefully or otherwise) is unrelated. If anything, it's in alignment to their ideology, not agai
84.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
I got that paper from The Neuroscience of Intelligence, it's the study cited in section 3.2, so if you don't think its relevant, Dr. Richard J. Haier seems to disagree. And if you can't be specific about what I'm sayin
85.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
The Google memo was hateful, anti-diversity, and he got exactly what he deserved (he was fired). According to his LinkedIn[0], he's been working at an unnamed startup for the past 4 years, so it's not like he was "cancelle
86.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
For sure, hate from a group in control is much different than hate from a group that isn't in control.
87.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
I guess I'm not familiar with people who are falling into this category you're suggesting. Could you cite some specific examples? I'm thinking of Kanye, Jordan Peterson, Andrew Tate, Nick Fuentes, etc. These people expresse
88.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
When people say reprehensible things, they receive an amount of backlash as a result (sometimes more than is reasonable). The backlash has nothing to do with political ideology, however, so not sure why you're bringing it up. If your
89.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
I don't think any honest defense of CRT said any of the things you claimed here, where have you heard those arguments? Things that are "Nazi" or "white supremacist" ideas and ideologies get called out, and those ide
90.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
Right, nobody (AFAIK) has been banned from Twitter, YouTube, Facebook, etc. for espousing Laissez-faire economic policies.

More ›