SpeedilyDamage

11 ms·

91.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
I disagree; Donald Trump and Mitch McConnell are wildly different human beings, the model would for sure learn very different facts about the two of them.
92.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
Wait, so you think minority groups hating one another is not aligned with the majority/minority group division? I don't understand; by definition each group is a member of a minority social group, wouldn't that obviously b
93.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
Believing hate is distributed evenly amongst majority and minority groups, to me, is an even more fascinating bias.
94.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
Wouldn’t it be funny if this weren’t partisan? Try Ron DeSantis, Mitch McConnel, or literally any other Republican. For that matter, try Hillary Clinton or Nanci Pelosi; Biden has never gotten the ire those ladies have, maybe he’s just too
95.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
Eh, it’s usually the rhetoric that’s appalling, then traced back to the right, not the other way around. If you could give an example of rhetoric that is suppressed because it’s “right wing”, that would be helpful.
96.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
How can I hide comments in VS Code? And all I’ve said is comments are a last resort. Nothing black/white about that, just tired of egos getting in the way of seeing how there are a million ways in practice to avoid comments that peopl
97.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
How so?
98.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
Howso?
99.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
I feel like the Tetris study[0] in section 3.2 kind of goes against what you're saying here, but that's not really what I'm talking about. I'm talking about, all else equal, good learners and good leaders can "tap i
100.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
You get to call this frivolous, but my perception of money isn't consistent? Interesting.
101.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
For some people.
102.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
Well yeah, because they had passion, got to a certain level of skill, then lost that passion. Sounds like it fits perfectly both with what I've said and what the submission is about, and again has nothing to do with "crazy smart
103.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
"Subscribe to WIRED to continue reading." Besides, looks like an opinion article, suggesting a course of action, not factually claiming, as you are here, that one idea or opinion is objectively correct.
104.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
"included" is a loaded word here. Nobody is getting your content, unaltered, as ChatGPT responses, and if they are it's a bug that'll get fixed. Besides, the law is far from resolved on this issue, there are a number of
105.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
Isn't this what the Azure OpenAI service is for? Sure it's technically "Microsoft", but at some point you have to trust someone if you want to build on the modern web.
106.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
$20/mo, for the people in this situation, is not an amount of money worth thinking about.
107.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
Totally agree; is it worth the added cost? And if I can build a site that does this on my own, with a better UX, can I charge customers $19/mo?
108.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
I feel like you're missing the entire point of abstraction. When you're looking at code, you should be able to understand what it does by way of how it's structured, and you shouldn't have to load the entire codebase in
109.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
Also, doesn’t it raise questions about what Mozart was doing at a crazy young age? Was he practicing piano before he could read? Walk? How many things does your toddler practice?
110.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
If you want cheaper, can’t you use the Azure OpenAI service? For this it seems more like you’re paying for the interface than ChatGPT itself.
111.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
It's probably worth examining why you think my PoV is "insane and crazy" as that's not a normal reaction.
112.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
Maybe I'm old, but "wordcel" is an awful term with zero empathy or understanding.
113.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
Maybe "smart" people have learned how to be passionate and/or motivated about topics, rather than have some increased capacity for learning. And maybe "great" leaders have figured out how to make a boring topic inte
114.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
I think you’re trapped in this “comments must exist” mindset that’s simply not true or necessary. Every single thing you like about comments can be accomplished with self documenting code and accompanying “why” docs. There’s simply no need
115.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
You should not, as comments intermingled with code is a distraction at best, and actively harmful at worst.
116.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
This is a bad take, as the code is actually executed, whereas comments are not. As the code is , definitionally, the way the program works, it must be correct, necessarily. This is not true of the comments. This is why comments are dang
117.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
If the explanation is directly connected to specific parts of the code, it's not "why", it's "how". "Why" will be true regardless of implementation, "how" won't be. Comments should b
118.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
Sure, but throw it in a README.md, not in the code itself. Besides, if you foster a culture of writing "why" docs, the problem of where to place these docs is one you solved early on, so people will know where to go.
119.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
But that's the point; if it's a "why" doc, it shouldn't be specific to the code, so by virtue of the fact that you feel the need to place it there anyway, it's not really a "why" doc at all, and ins
120.
by SpeedilyDamage 4y ago
Why must that documentation go inline with the code? There are so many better ways to document design and implementation decisions that don't involve embedding English into source code files. We preach endlessly the idea of orthogonal

More ›