Smutte

4 ms·

1.
by Smutte 6y ago
Im not interested in arguing with you. I wanted to show you the data so you have a chance to make up you own mind. My definition of "really reach us"(you) is that you have some more facts in this crazy world of lies, hysteria and
2.
by Smutte 6y ago
First of all. There is one (perhaps two) month with excess mortality. "very high excess" is not a term I would use since it would leave almost no room between standard variance in death numbers and "high excess" or &quot
3.
by Smutte 6y ago
Not sure what you are on about. It is an explanation of what he is looking at. Do you need help interpreting the data and graph given previous conversation? The height of the bars represent the number of deaths over different years and the
4.
by Smutte 6y ago
I am trying to help you understand the actual death numbers that you were talking about in the thread I commented on (Sweden). Im not sure how data is reported to Euromomo, but sometimes its better to look at data with as few middlemen as p
5.
by Smutte 6y ago
https://imgur.com/a/sHq3gjp There you go. Data from official government agency. "Preliminary" and not full year since we're only in October 2020 now. https://scb.se/hitta-statistik/s
6.
by Smutte 9y ago
Here is a good example and again consider the tone. It is central in this whole drama. When you dont know all the facts in every detail, a good tool is to just try to understand wheteher the person who is sharing information is after the tr
7.
by Smutte 9y ago
Yes there are other links/comments from other people that give a better criticism. That is not what was discussed but although it is not as obvious, I think the same agenda shines through in your links. First quote doesn't say any
8.
by Smutte 9y ago
From the Wired article (comment from the scientist): "And I believe there is good evidence of both sexism (including sex stereotypes) and real psychological sex differences (some of which may be evolved) to be causes of the gender gaps
9.
by Smutte 9y ago
First of all, even having that conversation would be a HUGE leap forward in terms of intellectual honesty. The easy answer to you question (which I think many would agree with) is yes. However, reality is a bit more complicated. Is the 75&#
10.
by Smutte 9y ago
Last try. Someone asked whats up with this James guy. You answered with something that was completely false and even clearly contrary to what was written. (You admitted to this.) I pointed out that your original misrepresentation was simila
11.
by Smutte 9y ago
The actual mistake that you yourself realized that you made is, imho, a good example of what is happening in this drama. James gets accused of something that he really didnt write and people refer to things that are grossly misinterpreted o
12.
by Smutte 9y ago
It seems you interpreted my comment as a critique aimed at you as an individual and I can understand why you did that. However it was certainly not my goal and Im sorry if you felt attacked. I tried to be clear both that your comment (i.e.
13.
by Smutte 9y ago
Your previous comment is a good example of the larger issue at hand. Your comment, the Google incident but honestly current western society as a whole. It is actually quite interesting to try to understand... What brings a person to make a
14.
by Smutte 10y ago
A life is a life. If one life costs 7500 to save and another costs 15000 they are both still lives if you ask me. Should you spend 15000 to save one life or 7500*2 to save 2? If the one that costs 15000 is your child? Thats complicated of c
15.
by Smutte 10y ago
Depending on how and where you spend it, its about $7500 or more to save a life. http://www.givewell.org/giving101/Your-dollar-goes-further-o...