Last try. Someone asked whats up with this James guy. You answered with something that was completely false and even clearly contrary to what was written. (Y

Last try. Someone asked whats up with this James guy. You answered with something that was completely false and even clearly contrary to what was written. (You admitted to this.) I pointed out that your original misrepresentation was similar to what others do in this very drama. E.g. the statement from Google VP of Diversity attacking James. I also said I didnt mean to bash you any more (since you admitted), BUT that your original comment was an interesting example/illustration of something bigger. You obviously took offense. I tried to explain that I was talking about the comment in general and not you as an individual. I also said Im sorry if I offended you. But the fact remains that your comment was a misrepresentation of the memo that was similar to e.g. how the VP misrepresented it. Although you actually did it more explicitly than her. If you cant extract yourself as an individual from this observation you will probably never get it. If you think Im an idiot, thats ok.