SkyBelow

6 ms·

31.
by SkyBelow 3mo ago
>These two points seem slightly conflicting. Why if a human is truly more creative than AI, must it experience "the magic and absurdity of life" if it can be creative without "combining things into output"? I agree, y
32.
by SkyBelow 3mo ago
How errors add depend upon how you treat them. Two independent task? You have a 95% chance of each task being correct, so total success is .95^2 = 90.25% correct. Having two AIs verify the same task with each being 95% correct? That'
33.
by SkyBelow 3mo ago
I see an AI as an advanced calculator, but I see even a simple calculator as a poison to education if not strongly controlled. Number sense is such a nebulous concept, but it captures what I've seen people struggle with. A general six
34.
by SkyBelow 3mo ago
That entirely depends upon the cost of preventing them. At no cost, sure. But nothing is ever free. So what is the cost. <insert a villain who determines destroying all life is the best way to stop all future harm> There is also the
35.
by SkyBelow 3mo ago
>Many developers are too focused on delivery value compared to maintenance cost. The way this is worded feels like it leaves the blame on developers. Aren't these developers focused on exactly what they are being judged by? Should
36.
by SkyBelow 3mo ago
Are court decisions universally recognized? If a court rules someone true in one area, couldn't it still be considered slander/libel in another area if another court rules it as not being true? It is a bit like saying convicted m
37.
by SkyBelow 3mo ago
I think it might be built on something more than deterministic systems. Some property that is a subset of deterministic, so all your argument still apply, but merely being deterministic is not good enough. LLMs are what made me start consi
38.
by SkyBelow 3mo ago
>The parents job is to keep their kids out of trouble. I challenge that anyone believes this, and for my evidence, I would submit all the age based laws that protect children regardless of what parents do. We have already, long ago, deci
39.
by SkyBelow 4mo ago
Never really like this because it feels some arbitrary as to what counts as making a claim. Human language is filled with implications, and those implications are filled with implied claims. Yet burden or proof seems mostly used when some
40.
by SkyBelow 4mo ago
But why does it do so inconsistently, and sometimes even forgetting to swap back to English when it comes time to do 'normal' output? It also seems recent, as when I was using deepseek even a week ago this was very rare compared
41.
by SkyBelow 4mo ago
>and everyone else will poor and unemployed How so? Everyone would still have their skills to provide goods and services and everyone would still have wants for other's goods and services, so an economy would still run. AI can shi
42.
by SkyBelow 4mo ago
I don't think that is the argument. The argument is more "I want to do good thing X, but it will also cause bad thing Y." followed by "Wait, bad thing Y is going to happen anyways, so I might as well do good thing X so
43.
by SkyBelow 4mo ago
Is this self contradictory? Making a claim of 3 star service, without providing 3 star service evidence, isn't any different than a claim like they don't clean the dishes enough. Sure, you didn't write out the exact words, b
44.
by SkyBelow 4mo ago
One of the major concerns with prototyping, at least in my experience and based on the general vibe I've felt from others over the years, is that clients will generally do some variation of "You have a working prototype? So how m
45.
by SkyBelow 4mo ago
Does the model need to offer new testable hypothesis if it provides a way of explaining existing results that current models can't? If it is competing against another model that does both that and offers new testable hypothesis (which
46.
by SkyBelow 4mo ago
Didn't the original authors end up leaking this before OpenAI fixed it? They gave them a chance, but then had to decide between staying fully silent or publishing the details despite malicious actors learning about it before it was fi
47.
by SkyBelow 4mo ago
>responsibly disclosed Isn't this a double plus good phrase? What makes this more responsible? Reasoning about first order effects of different disclosure models? But what if someone uses higher order reasoning and critical think
48.
by SkyBelow 4mo ago
Nothing of the level of rocket failure, but I've tracked down issues where you are never sure of the cause. You keep the doubt and let it drive you. You aren't as much sure of a theory, as you have the theory you most want to di
49.
by SkyBelow 4mo ago
Depends upon the filtering system. Consider indie games. If there are 10 of them and 5 are great, you don't need any filter. You look through 5 great and 5 not so great games and end up with 5 great ones. Now go to a world where indi
50.
by SkyBelow 4mo ago
Apologies on the typo. One other question I had but wasn't sure if it would leave my previous post too unfocused is "aren't we a bit too early to determine in our current government systems are really the most effective?&quot
51.
by SkyBelow 4mo ago
Isn't this still assuming we can even determine what is true or false? Newtonian physics is false, but it works well enough we teach it in college. But our best models of physics are currently in disagreement, so can we even say they
52.
by SkyBelow 4mo ago
If it was so clearly ineffective, why does it get challenged more often and replaced? Existing corporations aren't likely to change, but new startups and work owned coops exist, so why don't they compete? Maybe ranking it on a sc
53.
by SkyBelow 4mo ago
I think it depends upon the effort involved. Think the difference between AI saying "This paragraph seemed muddled and lacks a clear point. Consider rewriting it." vs "Here, I rewrote this paragraph to focus it more on bridg
54.
by SkyBelow 4mo ago
>This is just the modern equivalent of "just google it". I don't think that is always the case. Sometimes it is. Other times the social cues and later follow up makes it seem the person thought they were being really hel
55.
by SkyBelow 5mo ago
Because being right 60% of the time with minimal work is still amazing, as long as one accounts for the failure rate correctly. Say I want to look up some game from my childhood, which I barely remember any details for. Going to google and
56.
by SkyBelow 5mo ago
>Are you also disillusioned with professional sports, music, acting, and art? Not the person you were asking, but I think we need to double down on disillusionment in these. I've spoken to too many kids who dreamed of careers in th
57.
by SkyBelow 5mo ago
Isn't this just a false dichotomy in web comic form? Implying that there are only two options, full participant or complete withdrawal from society, as a means of suggesting that one cannot apply morals to how one chooses to engage wi
58.
by SkyBelow 5mo ago
>I believe in A, I don't take a strong position on B But if A and B are opposed, then there is a question of why a strong position on A can be allowed with a weak position on B, if the reason for the strong position on A would also
59.
by SkyBelow 5mo ago
Sometimes there are two groups of people who have different opinions that don't interact, but given the extent they take up the same platform and don't seem to see each other, I'm not sure it is really a fallacy even then. Fi
60.
by SkyBelow 5mo ago
This is the same logic of 'not a booby trap' booby trap,s which sometimes do work out in the favor of the one setting them if they weren't too open about it. If your commit message is that you are talking about OpenClaw just

More ›