SheinhardtWigCo

50 ms·

1. 571.▲
   by SheinhardtWigCo 8y ago

   Not just execs, I hope. The engineers who wrote the code and managers who told them to do it should also face justice.
2. 572.▲
   by SheinhardtWigCo 8y ago

   Do you think people buying cars with autopilot believe they are getting fully driverless systems?
3. 573.▲
   by SheinhardtWigCo 8y ago

   Your post suggested that missing any obvious obstacles casts doubt on Tesla's claim that lidar isn't necessary, but I'm saying their claim will indeed be proven true if the overall safety level of vision-and-radar autonomy is
4. 574.▲
   by SheinhardtWigCo 8y ago

   > There is a whole class of problems the field cars can never help with, since they lack the dead-reckoning sensor setup and precise odometry a development car would have. Can you give an example? I'm curious what kind of triggers s
5. 575.▲
   by SheinhardtWigCo 8y ago

   This argument misses the forest for the trees. Even level 5 autopilot will sometimes crash into objects that are clearly visible to most humans, as will lidar-based solutions. But if the robot fleet is an order of magnitude safer than the h
6. 576.▲
   by SheinhardtWigCo 8y ago

   Not according to the licenses of those projects. They’re not a charity.
7. 577.▲
   by SheinhardtWigCo 8y ago

   The Australian ones come with a gag order.
8. 578.▲
   by SheinhardtWigCo 8y ago

   This is on the order page for the Model 3 right now: > Summon: your parked car will come find you anywhere in a parking lot. Really. Except that feature hasn’t shipped and there’s no ETA. I call that a lie. I appreciate what Tesla is doi
9. 579.▲
   by SheinhardtWigCo 8y ago

   From your company's website: > Our simple web and mobile apps allow your team to text 1000+ people an hour. Your contacts see a normal SMS from a local number. Does that mean you would appear on your own live map of attacks?
10. 580.▲
    by SheinhardtWigCo 8y ago

    Aren’t you afraid of being sued by Google for selling their search results?
11. 581.▲
    by SheinhardtWigCo 8y ago

    Damn, that website has some impressively obnoxious ads.
12. 582.▲
    by SheinhardtWigCo 8y ago

    Firefox is blocking one of their scripts from loading. Same problem with the Firefox Focus content blocker on iOS.
13. 583.▲
    by SheinhardtWigCo 8y ago

    OP is called out for soliciting reviews further down the thread: https://mobile.twitter.com/rashiq/status/1081092129022201856
14. 584.▲
    by SheinhardtWigCo 8y ago

    I’m a US resident visiting my European home country for Christmas, and I’m astonished at how much worse the web browsing experience is, now that the GDPR is law. The cookie notices of old have turned into full-screen modal dialogs that are
15. 585.▲
    by SheinhardtWigCo 8y ago

    What happens when a user loses their FIDO key?
16. 586.▲
    by SheinhardtWigCo 8y ago

    > That every day comes fresh and new, not a single atom is the same as it was a moment ago. So what? What difference does that make to OP?
17. 587.▲
    by SheinhardtWigCo 8y ago

    Can you break down how user dollar contributions were disbursed in 2018? What percentage was paid out to websites and content creators; what percentage was paid into the user growth fund; and what percentage was taken by Brave as a fee?
18. 588.▲
    by SheinhardtWigCo 8y ago

    Brave is a web browser that takes your money and claims to pay out to your favorite websites and content creators, but in most cases actually pays into a "user growth pool" that funds pyramid-shaped marketing (paying users to use
19. 589.▲
    by SheinhardtWigCo 8y ago

    > there's still a ways to go before security camera footage can be sent to the PD and automatically identify the offender via facial analysis. Be careful what you wish for. I don't want the police to be able to perform accurate
20. 590.▲
    by SheinhardtWigCo 8y ago

    This “One” thing is getting a bit tired.
21. 591.▲
    by SheinhardtWigCo 8y ago

    I don't think this move achieved much of anything, other than to encourage business executives to use ephemeral messaging for their confidential internal communications.
22. 592.▲
    by SheinhardtWigCo 8y ago

    got a source on that?
23. 593.▲
    by SheinhardtWigCo 8y ago

    chick, dude, guy, gal
24. 594.▲
    by SheinhardtWigCo 8y ago

    How do you know that your clean Thinkpad is clean?
25. 595.▲
    by SheinhardtWigCo 8y ago

    It’s maybe not a big deal on an individual level, sure - but imagine the damage one could inflict on humanity by having this dataset for world leaders or even whole populations.
26. 596.▲
    by SheinhardtWigCo 8y ago

    It’s not just buying interests, though, is it? It’s where you go, who you talk to, what you talk about, your sexual preferences, bank balance, religious views, whether you have weapons in your home, whether you’re having an illicit affair,
27. 597.▲
    by SheinhardtWigCo 8y ago

    How is that different to what OP said?
28. 598.▲
    by SheinhardtWigCo 8y ago

    And what happens when the ad company holding the personal data of 50 million people gets compromised?
29. 599.▲
    by SheinhardtWigCo 8y ago

    Do you think that building codes should require every bedroom to have a microphone connected to the local courthouse, to be activated only in the event that the authorities suspect the occupants are going to discuss a crime?
30. 600.▲
    by SheinhardtWigCo 8y ago

    There’s a word in the first paragraph of your comment that should be replaced if you want to be taken seriously.