ShadowOfThePit

3 ms·

1.
by ShadowOfThePit 5d ago
Well, that's already viable in Switzerland. Any proposed law can be forced into a national vote by collecting 50'000 signatures for a Referendum.
2.
by ShadowOfThePit 5d ago
I used to suffer from night terrors until well into my teenage years. It made me think, I would never know how much I was supposedly suffering in the moment. But what does it matter, if I can't remember it? Scary stuff.
3.
by ShadowOfThePit 5d ago
Wait what? Are you saying that everything I have seen on the Epstein files through 'public discourse' is BS? Like, all of it?
4.
by ShadowOfThePit 8d ago
This is so stupid. I love it.
5.
by ShadowOfThePit 8d ago
Please explain why having less soldiers would be "great".
6.
by ShadowOfThePit 10d ago
If it helps the lower tiers of ChatGPT continue being free, I'd support it.
7.
by ShadowOfThePit 10d ago
ChatGPT is already free to use? What, do you expect them to keep providing this without any return? Besides, who will pay for the compute of LLMs in your utopian future?
8.
by ShadowOfThePit 10d ago
Summarized. > "AIs are not conscious. They do not feel, experience, or suffer. They do not have innate preferences or underlying motivations. They are sequence completion engines, internally hollow, designed to follow instructions,
9.
by ShadowOfThePit 10d ago
Huh, that's close to my own writing style. But you are right, it's becomes an issue when three sentences make up a 100+ word paragraph lol
10.
by ShadowOfThePit 10d ago
I know science is about measuring and evaluating everything, again and again. And it's mildly interesting that it can be detected on MRI scans. But isn't it kind of obvious that someone living in poor conditions will be worse off?
11.
by ShadowOfThePit 10d ago
It's part of the already-discussed proposal of a social media ban for under 15 year olds[1], which includes the aforementioned complete ban on under 13 year olds. To note is that 13-15 year olds can get restricted access under parental
12.
by ShadowOfThePit 10d ago
But why?
13.
by ShadowOfThePit 10d ago
lmao the author's response makes it even funnier. The entire comment reeks of AI with every sentence. > Let me read the rest for you. You keep repeating what was already discussed. > You did in one afternoon what Google refused t
14.
by ShadowOfThePit 11d ago
> Data reviewed by the EFF included searches labelled 'LMAO', 'LOL', 'Hehe', 'Haha', 'idk' and 'blah'. Other entries included 'asdfg' and strings of apparently random
15.
by ShadowOfThePit 11d ago
Additionally: > The phone sent me to the address. The address sent me back to the phone. The loop closed in one day. > This is not a mess. A mess looks different. This is a design (...) > One account, four companies. Each does exac
16.
by ShadowOfThePit 11d ago
This is exceessively verbose, repetitive and ai-written (translated?). I got lost half-way through because it keeps going on random, barely-related tangents. - What do I care about your problems with Anthropic? It's not even a good com
17.
by ShadowOfThePit 12d ago
With xcancel down again, this was helpful. Thank you.
18.
by ShadowOfThePit 12d ago
Extrapolating the current savings to the entire userbase, they could save £6'000 every day, for a total of £2.190 million per year? That alone can justify the change and any associated costs, impressive! > There is also a less glamo
19.
by ShadowOfThePit 12d ago
Click on "Tools", you'll see the old number and search time if you so desire
20.
by ShadowOfThePit 15d ago
The linked article has nothing to do with the headline.
21.
by ShadowOfThePit 17d ago
Surely there's an extension for whatever browser you are using? Firefox: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/hide-google-ai-overviews/ Chromium: https://chromewebstore.googl
22.
by ShadowOfThePit 25d ago
Damn, the racism example is really good.
23.
by ShadowOfThePit 1mo ago
Many of the regulations focused on climate change and sustainability wouldn't exist. Now, of course, it's extremely hard to logically argue against these. But that doesn't mean they aren't extremely annoying to deal with
24.
by ShadowOfThePit 1mo ago
What about the argument of these regulations not existing in the first place were it not for the EU?
25.
by ShadowOfThePit 1mo ago
Europe is willing to fight to the last Ukrainian, or something.
26.
by ShadowOfThePit 1mo ago
> According to the European Commission, the new rules are expected to bring €4.8 billion in growth and investment within the EU. The source of this number seems to come from here, on page 73: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/leg
27.
by ShadowOfThePit 1mo ago
It was nice reading this, thanks for sharing
28.
by ShadowOfThePit 1mo ago
I ran into a different site where every single action had a debug breakpoint pausing everything if you had devtools open. Luckily, you can disable breakpoints.
29.
by ShadowOfThePit 1mo ago
This is incomprehensible to me. What does the code mean? What are you trying to say? What's your point? Is this some kind of joke?
30.
by ShadowOfThePit 1mo ago
Huh, did you get this example from an LLM, or is it the bog-standard way of explaining it? I asked ChatGPT to explain what a "copper plate" is because I was lazy, and it used 1:1 the exact same example as you did (Germany,wind gen

More ›