lmao the author's response makes it even funnier. The entire comment reeks of AI with every sentence. > Let me read the rest for you. You keep repeating what

lmao the author's response makes it even funnier. The entire comment reeks of AI with every sentence. > Let me read the rest for you. You keep repeating what was already discussed. > You did in one afternoon what Google refused to do in two weeks: you named the messages. You just guessed. Fella, you mentioned the mails first. If you thought that wasn't relevant, you wouldn't have mentioned it. And any reader would assume that you pointed at it being the culprit. > "Why is Anthropic in there, why the Forbes lady, why Ireland." You know, the issue is the lack of connection with the remainder of the test. You only explained the reason for the context. You barely touched my actual complaints: Again, why insult Ireland? Why mention the Forbes list? > You would know, had you read past the headings. None of those things are part of any heading. I even provided half a dozen quotes from all over the article talking about AI tells. > This article was not written for you. Then don't share it. > The front page was a bonus. Clearly it wasn't lmao. > Thank you for the demonstration. Hahaha, someone is malding. As I already said, fundamentally righteous. Doesn't mean I can't find your attitude just as shitty as the company. I pity the judges who will have to read it all.