Seattle3503

4 ms·

61.
by Seattle3503 5mo ago
Does mercurial allow you to re-write history like that?
62.
by Seattle3503 5mo ago
The rules around CVE reporting changed recently and it would be expected a lot more are accepted.
63.
by Seattle3503 5mo ago
My team has been using AI to add code, but also to aggressively remove old deprecated code. "Is anyone still using this? How does this get called" is easier to answer when you can toss your FE, BE, and entire codebase at an agent
64.
by Seattle3503 5mo ago
Are you a dev? What does part time look like?
65.
by Seattle3503 5mo ago
I have a similar problem in a community I'm a a part of? How are you reliably detecting AI?
66.
by Seattle3503 5mo ago
Yes > The question is whether the company can show, before rolling a product out to billions of people, that it is not predatory by design. "Not predatory" is a negative
67.
by Seattle3503 5mo ago
Proving something is addictive is not proving a negative
68.
by Seattle3503 5mo ago
And examples where it goes right. Federal reserve, FDA, SEC, etc..
69.
by Seattle3503 5mo ago
You create an agency and give it a mandate that requires it to balance concerns.
70.
by Seattle3503 5mo ago
> The burden of proof should fall on the platform, not the victim. The question is not whether a harmed user can show specific damage. The question is whether the company can show, before rolling a product out to billions of people, that
71.
by Seattle3503 5mo ago
Only for a subset of people. Many would accept solutions that preserve privacy. Divide and conquer. Remove supporters from the anti-privacy group.
72.
by Seattle3503 6mo ago
If I need to grab 100 locks, they are all moving around a lot, but I've got the first 10, will the order be the same for someome trying to get the same 100? Eg maybe someone swaps two that neither of us has grabbed yet.
73.
by Seattle3503 6mo ago
I don't think they were talking about the size of the codebase. How much funding does emacs require to maintain?
74.
by Seattle3503 6mo ago
If you're running in a docker container you share the host kernel. You might not have a choice.
75.
by Seattle3503 6mo ago
Am I still allowed to invoke cc in a bash script, or is that out too? Interactive sessions only.
76.
by Seattle3503 6mo ago
Agreed, I found this article hard to follow and emotive in a way that made it feel extremely biased.
77.
by Seattle3503 7mo ago
I did, but the govt is one of my companies customers
78.
by Seattle3503 7mo ago
> I'm hopeful that improvements in LLMs mean we can ditch ORMs (under the guise that they are quicker to write queries and the inbetween mapping code with) and instead make good use of SQL to harness the powers that modern databases
79.
by Seattle3503 7mo ago
I think of "plan" mode as a read-only mode where the LLM isn't chomping at the bit to start writing to files. Rather than being excitable and over-active, it is receptive and listening.
80.
by Seattle3503 7mo ago
Those all cite Iranian government sources. It's certainly credible that US/Israel bombed a school. But it's also credible that Iran would lie about US/Israel bombing a school. In these situations we need a higher standar
81.
by Seattle3503 7mo ago
These days kinetic wars are accompanied by online information wars. What's the harm in waiting for corroboration and more evidence in a rapidly evolving situation?
82.
by Seattle3503 7mo ago
We should wait for more corroboration before we jump to conclusions about circumstance and attribution. In the Russia/Ukraine conflict, I've seen Russian's use footage and images from other conflicts to claim Ukraine is doing
83.
by Seattle3503 7mo ago
There is a lot of breaking news, much of it not verified. wrt bombing schools, people should be cautious about claims like this, this early.
84.
by Seattle3503 8mo ago
This is an interesting idea. Why hasn't an established foundation like the Apache Foundation attempted something like this?
85.
by Seattle3503 8mo ago
They might be spending more than the recommended 7% of their income on childcare. That's where the 400k number came from.
86.
by Seattle3503 8mo ago
Hrm that does seem suboptimal. There have got to be better approaches available to us through cryptography.
87.
by Seattle3503 8mo ago
> Personally I do agree with the "do nothing" stance, but I don't think it's going to hold up among the wider public. The die is cast and far too many average people are supporting moves like this. So the first defens
88.
by Seattle3503 8mo ago
You could use an oblivious pairwise pseudonym, and then you do not require hardware attestation. But that does essentially limit one ID to one account per service.
89.
by Seattle3503 8mo ago
You are describing a situation where a pairwise pseudonymous identifier is generated. I don't think any real system does this with government IDs, but it might be possible.
90.
by Seattle3503 8mo ago
They are fundementally different problems. It is already the governments job to maintain a record of their citizens and basic demographic information like age. Private actors are already offering verification as a paid service. They are acc

More ›