Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Seattle3503
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
91.
▲
by
Seattle3503
8mo ago
It's worse than that. Money will continue to flow in to companies like Persona, becauae there is no alternative. Persona will use that money to continue to build profiles on people. Society would be better off paying cryptography resea
92.
▲
by
Seattle3503
8mo ago
You talk about tech literacy, but then conflate age verification with knowing someone's identity. You should see the work people are doing to perform age verification in a way that preserves privacy, for example the EU and Denmark.
93.
▲
by
Seattle3503
8mo ago
Why would they say that is necessary?
94.
▲
by
Seattle3503
8mo ago
Uploading IDs is the only solution we will get unless the people who care about privacy come up with something better.
95.
▲
by
Seattle3503
8mo ago
The nice thing about something bolted on like that is that it is not an essential feature of the core design and has no bearing on the original goal. It can be removed or reformed. The same isn't true of the approaches we are heading t
96.
▲
by
Seattle3503
8mo ago
Providing every citizen an ID every X years at no cost does seem like good policy.
97.
▲
by
Seattle3503
8mo ago
It seems like the solution is to provide an age verification mechanism with robust privacy protections. That way when we offer a solution that works for all of their states concerns, if they disagree with the privacy preserving approach we
98.
▲
by
Seattle3503
8mo ago
Its better than what we have now. Maybe using the ID could require a PIN code if we wanted to enhance security.
99.
▲
by
Seattle3503
8mo ago
If we create age verification tools with strong privacy protections that solve the problems they raise, we can can call their bluff. If we fight every and any solution, we may end up with their solution, becauase they build it. We end up
100.
▲
by
Seattle3503
8mo ago
> Some observers present privacy-preserving age proofs involving a third party, such as the government, as a solution, but they inherit the same structural flaw: many users who are legally old enough to use a platform do not have governm
101.
▲
by
Seattle3503
8mo ago
Are there regulatory barriers to entering the DRAM market like there are in housing?
102.
▲
by
Seattle3503
8mo ago
> If you want greater reach for your work, Instagram unfortunately is still the only option. Wasn't people wanting reach what supposedly ruined Instagram in the first place? Seems like wanting it both ways if you want reach for your
103.
▲
by
Seattle3503
8mo ago
Should device manufacturers be worried about this direction? Could they eventually be locked out too?
104.
▲
by
Seattle3503
8mo ago
Trump always chickens out.
105.
▲
by
Seattle3503
8mo ago
The neat thing is that if government provides identity, you don't have to use it for any system you build. But I'm curious how you would deal with spam and Sybils?
106.
▲
by
Seattle3503
8mo ago
To be clear, all we need from the government is to establish a person really exists and verify basic properties. We don't need more than that, so we can and should use all cryptography at our disposal (and invent more) to prevent any m
107.
▲
by
Seattle3503
8mo ago
yeah and from the article, it sounds like they chat with the perps and befriend them to build trust.
108.
▲
by
Seattle3503
8mo ago
We've seen ~20 years of people trying to solve identity without the government. We've seen plenty of solutions that can provide stable identities over time, but we haven't really seen anything that provides meaningful sybil r
109.
▲
by
Seattle3503
8mo ago
Identity is "infrastructure" government should provide via something like mDLS. A lot of work needs to go into make sure it is secure and it can be used in a way that protects privacy. Eg selective disclosure of attributes for ver
110.
▲
by
Seattle3503
8mo ago
Fair enough
111.
▲
by
Seattle3503
8mo ago
It seems like countries will do anything but tax carbon.
112.
▲
by
Seattle3503
8mo ago
What's IPFS 's killer app?
113.
▲
by
Seattle3503
8mo ago
Is there a good post-mortem of IPFS out there?
114.
▲
by
Seattle3503
8mo ago
> open source is, especially, always in conversation with the community of both users and developers Not necessarily. sqlite doesn't take outside contributions, and seems to not care too much about external opinion (at least, along
115.
▲
by
Seattle3503
8mo ago
It's interesting to see this land while Rust support of io_uring in a mainstream library is lagging. And not for lack of trying, its just difficult to design a safe (zero-cost) idiomatic Rust abstraction over io_uring's completion
116.
▲
by
Seattle3503
8mo ago
Is that claim even empirically true?
117.
▲
by
Seattle3503
8mo ago
This sort of purity policing happens to other open source mission driven projects. The same thing happens to Firefox. Open source projects risk spending all their time trying to satisfy a fundamentally extreme minority, while the big commer
118.
▲
by
Seattle3503
8mo ago
Chess is a "kind" learning environment. The world tends to have more "wicked" environments.
119.
▲
by
Seattle3503
8mo ago
How much is the subject matter expertise you built at the last job was useful at your current job?
120.
▲
by
Seattle3503
8mo ago
In competitive industries, bad firms will fail. Some industries are not competitive though. I have a friend that went a little crazy working as a PM at a large health insurance firm.
More ›