Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
SCHiM
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
44 ms
·
421.
▲
by
SCHiM
11y ago
If there is a reasonable suspicion I don't see the problem with giving law enforcement the legal ability to hack their targets. This is something very different from drag-net surveillance and should not be tainted with the same stigma.
422.
▲
by
SCHiM
11y ago
Keep in mind that the situation she recalls, the one with the guy that apologizes to her for cussing, is perhaps not the sort of sexism you would want to try and get rid of. The way I see it, this coming from a early 20s male (read, shall w
423.
▲
by
SCHiM
11y ago
This might be true, but you should also consider that sending humans up is more challenging. And if science rises to the challenge we will learn more from sending humans than from sending robots.
424.
▲
by
SCHiM
11y ago
This is something you will hear from disinterested teens too when their teachers try to make them vocalize their opinions on some school subject: Teacher: What did you think about <subject> Teen: I think it's fun Teacher: Why do
425.
▲
by
SCHiM
11y ago
No you are wrong. Perhaps it's not the case everywhere. But like I said, from personal experience I know that certain types of domains are checked. I tried and failed to register a certificate for a phising domain that masqueraded as a
426.
▲
by
SCHiM
11y ago
No, Bacteriophages (phages), viruses that infect and kill bacteria.
427.
▲
by
SCHiM
11y ago
How does lets encrypt handle possible phising domains? Even if there's zero mitigation I think the benefits will outweigh the downsides, but I wonder if there's anything that stops a criminal from registering a domain that is very
428.
▲
by
SCHiM
11y ago
> This is because there is only one way to ensure human needs are met, and it isn't technocratic anything. It is to ask people and empower them to get what they need directly. I.e. democracy, in as direct and total a form as we can
429.
▲
by
SCHiM
11y ago
But we're also on the cusp of being able to identify and then pre-emptively remove those genes for the gene pool directly via IVF + screening of the embryo to make sure that it doesn't carry any known diseases and/or defects.
430.
▲
by
SCHiM
11y ago
But isn't that just called 'having a song stuck in your head?' I almost always have a song running in the background, never the same, but I wake up to a song and I go to sleep with a song.
431.
▲
by
SCHiM
11y ago
Better to have all 0day trading above board than below I think. The genie is out of the bottle, it's senseless to outlaw this kind of behaviour since the people and the skills are already out there. Even AnglerEK uses 0days sometimes,
432.
▲
by
SCHiM
11y ago
I HATED homework. I can honestly say that it's one of the main reasons I didn't have a fun time at school, since these things tend to snowball out of control. Don't do your homework -> get into trouble -> teachers thing
433.
▲
by
SCHiM
11y ago
Hey I do the same! Only with variables, and almost always when using array indexes that are not 'i' or 'x'. Sometimes is annoys me, and I've noticed that it's worse when I use CamelCasing and not as bad when i_
434.
▲
by
SCHiM
11y ago
The English crown apparently introduced something like patents when it found itself too constricted by parliament. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Letters_patent
435.
▲
by
SCHiM
11y ago
Not only is it complicated, the lack of documentation and the leaky XML libraries that abound ensure that whoever ends up implementing SAML are prone to make security mistakes. I've audited two systems that used SAML to authenticate th
436.
▲
by
SCHiM
11y ago
I don't think that's a fair position to take, fair to yourself that is. The company then is not the same as it is now. Enough time has passed since then and now that it's safe to assume that all the people in important positi
437.
▲
by
SCHiM
11y ago
Yeah, I rather liked the way some of the sprouts looked. I certainly won't be the first to sport one of them, but I might be an early adopter if someone with more guts tries it out first ^^
438.
▲
by
SCHiM
11y ago
That is still a consequence of editing as opposed to the editing itself. Perhaps it's unfair to discuss eugenics in the way it would be used in an ideal world. I agree with you that the scenario you sketch seems far from impossible. Bu
439.
▲
by
SCHiM
11y ago
While I understand the problems that one might have with induced genetic differences between classes (that would be inevitable given a capitalists approach to consumer eugenics) I've never understood the moral problem with tinkering wi
440.
▲
by
SCHiM
11y ago
> collateral costs Read "human lives". I understand and share your sentiment regarding the fact that a chance towards a (seemingly) more liberal form of government is good. But I'd be hesitant to call the costs of unrest a
441.
▲
by
SCHiM
11y ago
>you might end up just moving the pollution to a different location. Still if one is convinced that, for whatever reasons, pollution cannot be helped. This could be a good thing.
442.
▲
by
SCHiM
11y ago
> “We’ve gotten a lot of requests from property developers who want to place it in a few filthy rich neighborhoods of course, and I tend to say no to these right now,” he says. “I think that it should be in a public space.” I love the id
443.
▲
by
SCHiM
11y ago
Reading the first paragraph immediately reminds me of the The Quantum Thief by Hannu Rajaniemi. In it, there's a colony where every conceivable surface is covered with sensors that monitor every aspect of life. It's stored encrypt
444.
▲
by
SCHiM
11y ago
> Umm, no Exactly what are you disagreeing with? Going by your comment you seem to think that I said that a ban would have no effect at all. I did no such thing, and I would suggest that you read more carefully next time. So, umm, no I c
445.
▲
by
SCHiM
11y ago
I'm not too worried, like all prohibited substances and devices (except maybe weapons of mass destruction) there will always be ways to get what you want if you want. Especially since from the headlines it appears that they're con
446.
▲
by
SCHiM
11y ago
I remember back when I was younger I used to be active on a programming website (ok it was a game hacking website, but I was active in the programming sections mostly). I wrote a number of tutorials, some of what I wrote was crap. I was 15&
447.
▲
by
SCHiM
11y ago
Depending on where OP lives, that might not have been a felony. I'm pretty sure that in my country I can sell whatever software I want, as long as I brand it as 'automatic patch management testing' or something...
448.
▲
by
SCHiM
11y ago
It just isn't bad enough yet. If you look at the past it seems that humans will continue to ignore their predicament until it actually becomes unbearable. Take for example Russia in wwI or the French revolution. Action only started hap
449.
▲
by
SCHiM
11y ago
I work at a security company and sometimes reverse engineer systems and/or code to see if it is vulnerable to a plethora of attacks. Presumably the only reason a closed source vendor would be against someone reversing their source is b
450.
▲
by
SCHiM
11y ago
I really, really disagree. If your data is on my computer I should have a say in what happens to it. If I want to tunnel your hsts connection through a proxy I should be able to do so. You can't imagine how frustrated I was when I foun
More ›