Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Rohansi
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
181.
▲
by
Rohansi
4mo ago
It has cameras so you should still be able to see everything, just not in color because the cameras are monochrome.
182.
▲
by
Rohansi
4mo ago
Usable sure, but then why did you get a Steam Controller if not to make use of the additional inputs?
183.
▲
by
Rohansi
4mo ago
Would you rather have it degrade to the functionality of an Xbox 360 controller without Steam? That's the best they could do without all games including support for the controller (latest SDL3 has it).
184.
▲
by
Rohansi
4mo ago
> You don't have to have assets loaded in RAM and also VRAM for the CPU/GPU to use them. You typically don't want to do this anyway in games. You're probably doing something wrong if you're reading textures/
185.
▲
by
Rohansi
4mo ago
Yup, even though this is just a gaming PC, most people are going to be using it as a game console.
186.
▲
by
Rohansi
4mo ago
PS5, Xbox? They're almost PCs and are in the same space as Steam Machine.
187.
▲
by
Rohansi
4mo ago
Even if you only used your Steam Machine to play Steam games it's still probably a better deal. Multiplayer and cloud saves are free so you don't need something like PlayStation Plus. Games are generally cheaper and Steam sales ma
188.
▲
by
Rohansi
4mo ago
Not that it matters as much for a gaming console but the PS5 Pro CPU is definitely the slower one.
189.
▲
by
Rohansi
4mo ago
16GB DDR5 + 8GB GDDR6
190.
▲
by
Rohansi
4mo ago
Of course, but we should all be doing our best to push back against unnecessary framework churn.
191.
▲
by
Rohansi
4mo ago
The problem is self-inflicted. You do not need to keep jumping to the next trendy framework.
192.
▲
by
Rohansi
4mo ago
The game logic here is running in JS. Only the rendering is handled by HTML and CSS. Is it really wrong that you can do this? All it requires is 3D transformation of elements.
193.
▲
by
Rohansi
4mo ago
They said the prototyped in a few languages before settling on Go. Based on what you said it sounds like they didn't do a great job at that and stuck with their decision anyway. > Also to note that it was pointed out that Native AOT
194.
▲
by
Rohansi
4mo ago
> because they had to make it with almost perfect backwards compatibility for one of the most popular languages with trillions of lines of code produced over decades. At what cost? A key benefit of value types is improved performance but
195.
▲
by
Rohansi
4mo ago
> .NET is about extending an existing application (Servlet API vs IIS) I don't think this is true anymore since ASP.NET Core. While you can still run under IIS but it's a more typical reverse proxy setup instead of running insi
196.
▲
by
Rohansi
4mo ago
Go was chosen mainly because it aligned more with how the existing compiler is designed. They did not want to redesign the compiler which eliminated C# as a choice. So Go is apparently just a better fit for quickly porting JavaScript code
197.
▲
by
Rohansi
4mo ago
> .NET is a copy of Java A copy which has had value types (Java's ongoing Project Valhalla) from the start, and reified generics for as long as it had generics. They're quite different once you take a deeper look.
198.
▲
by
Rohansi
4mo ago
That's what I was getting at. New software tends to run poorly on old hardware.
199.
▲
by
Rohansi
4mo ago
Tesla Model S was apparently the best selling electric car then.
200.
▲
by
Rohansi
4mo ago
How do you plan on maintaining state in cases where nobody is playing? Would surely need some nodes kept around just in case no players are active?
201.
▲
by
Rohansi
4mo ago
Same thing applies. Neither CPU would be able to fully saturate the available memory bandwidth so comparing by bandwidth alone is not accurate.
202.
▲
by
Rohansi
4mo ago
> since I got it 10 years ago Probably one of the big issues here. It's probably still the best Android TV you can get today but that's really sad because the SoC in it came out in 2015 (with some improvements in 2019). It was
203.
▲
by
Rohansi
4mo ago
Sounds like a cool project! Do you have any specific use cases in mind for types of games this would be beneficial for? IMO in most cases having one player be the host is good enough. Maybe competitive games where you want to ensure the hos
204.
▲
by
Rohansi
4mo ago
> The idea came out of me wondering a few years ago why a multiplayer game couldn't simply be run on the player's machines without a central server. That's how they used to work! Some used peer-to-peer networking, others h
205.
▲
by
Rohansi
4mo ago
I don't disagree with your conclusion but the comparison of max bandwidth between the two SoCs is not enough. Neither of them will use all of that bandwidth doing AI work because the GPU will be compute limited. That's why dedic
206.
▲
by
Rohansi
4mo ago
Now explain to me how Apple's Secure Enclave does not do this: > the subsystem is "responsible for creating, monitoring and maintaining the security environment" and "its functions include managing the boot process, i
207.
▲
by
Rohansi
4mo ago
> It is much easier and cheaper, and carries considerably less risk to simply not. Which benefits Apple because it gets rid of competition on their platforms. > Apple’s incentives align with those of user privacy and security, and so
208.
▲
by
Rohansi
4mo ago
> The Secure Enclave is equivalent to a PC's TPM AMD PSP is little more than an embedded TPM. The capabilities are significantly different vs. Intel ME.
209.
▲
by
Rohansi
4mo ago
Sure, but where do you draw the line? Many PCs ship with some custom hardware but are not locked down. The MacBook Neo is probably not locked down but uses the same SoC as the iPhone 16 Pro which is locked down. IMO it's pretty arbitra
210.
▲
by
Rohansi
4mo ago
So what you're saying is it would be acceptable for Microsoft and PC manufacturers to lock down their hardware to running Windows only? Most ship with Windows so why not?
More ›