Rohansi

18 ms·

271.
by Rohansi 5mo ago
Good point. The majority of Apache projects are Java. Amazon is also mostly Java internally.
272.
by Rohansi 5mo ago
> But the reality is they aren't expressive enough for modern UIs Other than web tech, what actually is expressive enough?
273.
by Rohansi 5mo ago
I see this reason a lot but what are some actual examples of what is lacking in the .NET ecosystem vs. Java?
274.
by Rohansi 5mo ago
VS Code is also manageable. Or the CLI tools, if that's your thing. Rider is definitely the most equivalent to full Visual Studio though.
275.
by Rohansi 5mo ago
Unity is still using Mono these days which is missing basically all of the C# and .NET improvements from the past... 10 years now? Godot was using Mono too but has since switched to .NET in version 4. Still a great language and I hope Unity
276.
by Rohansi 5mo ago
> the image they tweeted alongside was that of broken computers, not of broken DMA cards. Actually, the image they tweeted shows a ton of PCIe cards. > DMA cards are not $6k The ones shown in the image they tweeted are! ($5,800 USD -&
277.
by Rohansi 5mo ago
Where does it say Riot bricked anything? They referred to the cards as paperweights but they don't need to be bricked to be a paperweight, being useless to the cheater due to Vanguard protections is enough. They definitely didn't
278.
by Rohansi 5mo ago
Which anti-cheat has bricked users' PCs? The Riot example above specifically targets DMA cards (cheating hardware) which no legitimate user will have.
279.
by Rohansi 5mo ago
Depends how you want to look at it. On one side asm.js is just JavaScript with special JIT handling, so you should be able to mix them. On the other side you have C/C++/Rust/whatever compiled to asm.js which needs to go throu
280.
by Rohansi 5mo ago
> Limiting post install as an attack vector is still a good thing. If npm got rid of the post install scripts it would permanently break the install process of packages that use it. Affected systems will need to bypass it, stay on an old
281.
by Rohansi 5mo ago
> Yes, I can imagine multiple choices. None of these will work properly. If you do copy-on-write where both the upstream server and local client make changes then the chunks you (or your local client) made changes to cannot be updated fr
282.
by Rohansi 5mo ago
If postinstall scripts are restricted the people behind these attacks will switch to something else. Package code is executed automatically by Node when imported, which could be a good replacement. It'll probably run when tests run ins
283.
by Rohansi 5mo ago
> Let's say you fly around long enough to load 1 GB of my world. That's a crap-ton of flying around, by the way. Minecraft worlds aren't static. Will you be billed to download updated chunks too? Also what happens if you
284.
by Rohansi 5mo ago
> Whoever host the server? Many are self hosted. > The difference is instead of only serving 50 people before lowering fps, instead now it can serve much more. 2b2t has 920 players online right now. That's quite a lot for a singl
285.
by Rohansi 5mo ago
> You and I are talking about different things. I'm talking about serving up the raw blocks alone. So shareable cloud saves? Who covers the cost for them?
286.
by Rohansi 5mo ago
But how does it accomplish that? And how can you guarantee it would solve those hardware issues?
287.
by Rohansi 5mo ago
> I should be able to give you a URL to some location, and when you click it, it opens up Minecraft, streams the blocks, and you're viewing it. > minecraft://server/loc?w=0&x=0&y=0&z=0 Probably no real
288.
by Rohansi 5mo ago
> i can certainly imagine that LLMs help with the process of understanding and editing old code. Can you trust it with assembly language for a custom-built CPU with its own instruction set? Even if you digitized all of the documentation
289.
by Rohansi 5mo ago
What would an encrypted MMU do differently?
290.
by Rohansi 5mo ago
Can't blame the engine for all of the poorly made games!
291.
by Rohansi 5mo ago
> main trouble to me has been caused by unity games Generally it's probably just bad optimization. But that only gets you so far because Unity's asset streaming is designed to work with level-based games. It will only let you u
292.
by Rohansi 5mo ago
> There's a huge difference, because postinstall scripts are almost guaranteed to run in your CI pipeline. Compromised code probably won't (maybe it will if your test cases test a compromised package) You don't need to tes
293.
by Rohansi 5mo ago
This doesn't really fix the issue though because package code is also executed at build time and during testing. Just maybe restricts the scope a little bit.
294.
by Rohansi 5mo ago
Why limit yourself to Microsoft's offerings? They've dropped the ball on all of their UI frameworks I don't see why anyone would trust them to build software on. Give it a few more years and MAUI will join the list of abandon
295.
by Rohansi 5mo ago
Mine did
296.
by Rohansi 5mo ago
> we are in 2026 and WPF is still the way to go IMHO. Why not Avalonia? It's not Microsoft but it is a spiritual successor to WPF, cross-platform, and open source.
297.
by Rohansi 5mo ago
> Nothing about MacOS prevents users from installing alternative OSes. Even with Apple's custom chips, that remains true. Reminder that the possibility of installing a third-party operating system on Apple hardware is not a given. T
298.
by Rohansi 5mo ago
M3 is taking longer than 2 years now. That came out late 2023.
299.
by Rohansi 5mo ago
The problem is you can't reverse engineer what was baked into the weights because they are just weights. You'll never know if you've fixed everything because it's not always going to be as obvious as request refusal. It&
300.
by Rohansi 5mo ago
> Closed or open source doesn't matter; it's the ability to control them that's important. People have been cracking and patching for decades without source, but they have that control. You have no idea what has been baked

More ›