RedBeetDeadpool

12 ms·

61.
by RedBeetDeadpool 5y ago
This is just a hater hatin, coming up with the worst ways to make web 3.0 look bad. An example of a real value proposition of web 3.0 is spam protection and reduction of fake reviews. Much like how bitcoin itself cannot be counterfeited, u
62.
by RedBeetDeadpool 5y ago
Many financial news sources are already casually mentioning price of bitcoin alongside the nasdaq and s&p 500. Give me all the formulas and statistics you want, but if I see a fast car, I'm calling it a fast car.
63.
by RedBeetDeadpool 5y ago
> re: anti-vaccine rhetoric Correction, it should be "re: vaccine rhetoric". Normality is no vaccine. Remember, vaccination is an idea propagated by some entity - "anti-vax" as anyone who disagrees has been labeled,
64.
by RedBeetDeadpool 5y ago
How do these writers still have a job? I get more out of a substack article.
65.
by RedBeetDeadpool 5y ago
If the price of electricity rises, then don't mine bitcoin, sell it back to the grid.
66.
by RedBeetDeadpool 5y ago
BLM's true intentions become clearer every passing day. Black-Lives-Matter does not stand for the words that make up its name. If they did, then they would be less authoritarian about firing black people who happen to disagree with t
67.
by RedBeetDeadpool 5y ago
> Sure keep saying that to yourself. As if the whole 'culture war' wasn't herd mentality at its finest. I don't think you made a single point. I believe its implicit however, that you have been offended.
68.
by RedBeetDeadpool 5y ago
I have watched a lot of longform podcasts, and pretty much most longform podcasts that are just two people talking have little to no editorialization of anything. Joe Rogan Experience in particular is just him and some other dude/dudet
69.
by RedBeetDeadpool 5y ago
Americans are ruthlessly free spirits with a disrespect for herd mentality and overglorification of extreme individualism. No amount of COVID information nor misinformation has anything to do with vaccine hesitancy. Being american is in ma
70.
by RedBeetDeadpool 5y ago
> few growing concerns regarding the special status of Pfizer at this point https://odysee.com/@Plazma:9/BroughtToYoubyPfizer:1 Absolutely not! Pfizer is not getting any sort of special treatment.
71.
by RedBeetDeadpool 5y ago
You know, if the science would allow research to be conducted, we might have a very good answer to that question. But as you can guess from my original post I side with the decisions the science has chosen to take. We can't let a
72.
by RedBeetDeadpool 5y ago
Go ahead, Downvote me without providing an explanation. What does that even prove except that you have no grounds for your statement and are cowards afraid to even debate anonymously? I could care less about losing internet points - but yo
73.
by RedBeetDeadpool 5y ago
If that's the case, I think you hit it spot on. Their actions speak for themselves. For myself, they don't need to say anything else.
74.
by RedBeetDeadpool 5y ago
I see the de-platforming and censoring of comedians specifically as being extremely concerning. Comedians in theory should not be a threat to anyone. To me this is the canary in the coalmine. What this tells me is that we as a society ca
75.
by RedBeetDeadpool 5y ago
You do realize wikipedia is compromised as well right? The only truth is in the edit wars.
76.
by RedBeetDeadpool 5y ago
Joe Rogan would interview Dr. Fauci if he were up for it. He would even let Dr. Fauci talk and defend his position for 3-4 hours if he had that much to say. I wouldn't call the guests on his show "fringe". In fact blanket c
77.
by RedBeetDeadpool 5y ago
> He’s a shock jock ffs. That's quite a shocking low effort attack that means absolutely nothing. Why should anyone believe your claims.
78.
by RedBeetDeadpool 5y ago
Lol, at the people downvoting you. No retort even. Joe Rogan talks about the largest range of controversial topics I've ever seen. He's willing to entertain ufo's, dmt, early hominid history, jfk assasination conspiracies,
79.
by RedBeetDeadpool 5y ago
> Toxic racists in YouTube comments did not provide any value to anyone They made their presence known. Thats valuable in and of itself. If people disagree with them and they are the minority, other commenters can then throw incendiary
80.
by RedBeetDeadpool 5y ago
> we had that and it made them genuinely useless That's better than one that is useful, but useful for only one affiliation.
81.
by RedBeetDeadpool 5y ago
You know, I personally value getting downvotes as much as upvotes. I'm not looking for confirmation bias. I'm looking to get thoughts moving, if people are affected by my words that's a good thing whether they agree or disa
82.
by RedBeetDeadpool 5y ago
Not necessarily. At this point "toxic" as a term means anything offensive to someone. Its a useful definition if you wanted unlimited power to censor anyone you wish. Its not useful for the public. People don't benefit on
83.
by RedBeetDeadpool 5y ago
I'm not angry at either. The people trying to control it are just doing the most logical thing to create a happy place. But my position is that that is an elementary mistake, like never letting your child play outside. I'm sayi
84.
by RedBeetDeadpool 5y ago
Sorry, my words didn't carry the intent I had. I meant that they can teach themselves how to withstand toxicity as well as how to withstand dopamine bullets.
85.
by RedBeetDeadpool 5y ago
Haha. There's always a relevant xkcd. These comics unfortunately both highlight the need for toxicity and dissenting opinions. In the first, moon landing conspiracists have come out with great suspicious findings including the fact th
86.
by RedBeetDeadpool 5y ago
You think that solving your problems requires better machines with more sophistication, which I disagree strongly on. If you're intent is to convince me, save yourself the effort. I'll state what I said one more time, with a lit
87.
by RedBeetDeadpool 5y ago
Yes, and no one can withstand the barrage of internet dopamine bullets. I agree, we weren't designed for it. But I disagree that no one can withstand the barrage. People can teach themselves to fend these things off, in fact I think
88.
by RedBeetDeadpool 5y ago
This, I can't disagree with. But moralistically I'm still at odds with the coddling.
89.
by RedBeetDeadpool 5y ago
> 2006-2019 I believe this was when youtube was growing. > it's trying to build an experience that doesn't actively turn people away I believe youtube was growing at this time. I personally don't remember it being that
90.
by RedBeetDeadpool 5y ago
There seems to be some perverted notion that "wholesome and funny" is somehow better. Its not. Its manipulative and a case of "I know whats good for you" that can only result when someone thinks they are actually bette

More ›