Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
RC_ITR
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
64 ms
·
691.
▲
by
RC_ITR
4y ago
If you’re going to make the “there’s no ethical consumption under capitalism” point, then why bother with an EV? For the same price, you can get a nicer ICE. That is why Elon’s actions are so weird. I agree with you that a chicken sandwic
692.
▲
by
RC_ITR
4y ago
Idk where you’re getting your info, but they’re globestar satellites and Apple invested half a billion dollars into that company. https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2022/11/emergency-sos-via-sat...
693.
▲
by
RC_ITR
4y ago
> Plaid, Simple, Clear, Square are all strong brands and trademarks, for example. Sure, those are brands. I agree. “Screen-scrape”, “I don’t know what simple is so it can’t be that great of a brand”,“Concierge” and “POS” would be bad bra
694.
▲
by
RC_ITR
4y ago
Cars can never be failed, only liberal governments can fail them?
695.
▲
by
RC_ITR
4y ago
> There are, however, plenty of real projects backed by real money with real employees, open books, and have proven resilient over these handful of years. Citation needed, especially considering what’s been going on with BNB
696.
▲
by
RC_ITR
4y ago
Just as a PSA in case not everyone knows this new feature. In the US and a growing number of other countries, the latest iPhones have a satellite network for emergencies. If tech giants are going to spend money on something cool, might as w
697.
▲
by
RC_ITR
4y ago
Clearly you’ve never been to California during an inversion.
698.
▲
by
RC_ITR
4y ago
> Every airline at every airport should have a certain number of crews and airplanes capable of providing service in place of a delayed flight. Good luck finding pilots to be “on-call” to fly anywhere in the world (and most commonly to s
699.
▲
by
RC_ITR
4y ago
Peloton is probably the weakest example possible of this since they took a very common and established word (for a group of people riding together) as their brand. In more practical terms, back when PTON was still a stock darling, they cons
700.
▲
by
RC_ITR
4y ago
What are you on about? What is this in response to? Please comment on the article, not your personal biases.
701.
▲
by
RC_ITR
4y ago
You think two law professors were running the show? Have you ever met a law professor? It’s not a question of corruptability, it’s a question of competence
702.
▲
by
RC_ITR
4y ago
This will likely be remembered as (one of) the peaks of loose monetary policy foolishness. Palantir had cash that it basically chose to turn into revenue (plus shares of high risk unprofitable businesses). That’s the opposite of how n
703.
▲
by
RC_ITR
4y ago
>state should in general not compel individuals (or businesses) to do things they don't want to do. This is a very easy thing to say as a member of majority groups, but American (and South African and European, and...) history has s
704.
▲
by
RC_ITR
4y ago
Show me on the Ticketmaster website where the TOS is shown before purchase.
705.
▲
by
RC_ITR
4y ago
Again, I’m not arguing laws in this branch of the thread. I’m just saying people who lean on “the law is this, they are in the right” ignore a major part of society and commerce to their own detriment.
706.
▲
by
RC_ITR
4y ago
Oh, remove and deny entry mean the same thing now? Listen, if you’re going to be a pedantic law critic, at least be iron clad.
707.
▲
by
RC_ITR
4y ago
You are forgetting that they have the right to not sell tickets to whomever they choose, but once that ticket is sold, they are on very shaky ground to ban someone unless they misrepresented who they were when buying the ticket. Tickets a
708.
▲
by
RC_ITR
4y ago
Sure but this whole “being principled” thing is so weird when people focus exclusively on the laws. Sure they can do this without anyone getting sued, but they can still face consequences for doing it (like people not going to see the Roc
709.
▲
by
RC_ITR
4y ago
Lmfao. I’d encourage you to really look inward and understand why you’re trying to gatekeeper the definition of charity. What pray tell makes a legitimate charity and why did you get to decide?
710.
▲
by
RC_ITR
4y ago
> No one cares about decentralization until there's a centralization failure It’s so wild to hear this, when, actually let’s just count some decentralized failures. 1) Remember when Solana just turned off? I bet you do since it ha
711.
▲
by
RC_ITR
4y ago
Lmfao. What is this straw man transaction that can be settled on ETH (keep in mind, you’re already completely leaning on sunk cost fallacy) but needs a lawyer off chain?! Like, either the terms are known and you put them in a smart contract
712.
▲
by
RC_ITR
4y ago
You’re giving China credit for being huge while talking about what goes on in 1/3 of its land area. The US is populated end to end
713.
▲
by
RC_ITR
4y ago
My point is that over that distance, any train is impractical? Like sure China has fast trains in a small area, but west of Chengdu, they don’t, so saying “China is a country nearly as large as the US with a robust train network” is a red
714.
▲
by
RC_ITR
4y ago
> Yeah, but what if that decentralized network of trustless computers already exists, and transactions costs relative to costs you would otherwise incur are very low? Sure and what if unicorns were real? Horses would seem pretty boring t
715.
▲
by
RC_ITR
4y ago
>Xinjiang compare very favourably with those in the US https://www.chinahighlights.com/china-trains/urumqi-lanzhou-... LOL, keep spreading that propaganda comrade!
716.
▲
by
RC_ITR
4y ago
Wait until you hear that cryptography and chain of block architectures can be done on centralized equipment and we don't need to rely on mining farms that we have no control over!
717.
▲
by
RC_ITR
4y ago
> I don't agree that we've seen Bitcoin be controlled by a single entity or that anyone has power to modify it against the will of market. I can say the same things of Visa? If the point is that economic incentives are what kee
718.
▲
by
RC_ITR
4y ago
You build one because it's way easier and cheaper to build a clearinghouse than it is to build a massively decentralized network of trust-less computers?
719.
▲
by
RC_ITR
4y ago
Everyone loves cryptography and the chain of blocks structure because they are good things Neither of those things are the defining feature of cryptocurrencies, decentralization is. Decentralization is one of the most pointless endeavors
720.
▲
by
RC_ITR
4y ago
The linked scenario was controversial because this one small town of 2,500 chose to not help (vs. the standard practice of other towns that do help). Then the national outcry from the rest of America caused them to change it. Whereve
More ›