3 ms·
My point is that over that distance, any train is impractical? Like sure China has fast trains in a small area, but west of Chengdu, they don’t, so saying “Chi
by RC_ITR 4y ago
My point is that over that distance, any train is impractical?
Like sure China has fast trains in a small area, but west of Chengdu, they don’t, so saying “China is a country nearly as large as the US with a robust train network” is a red herring.
The US is much more spread out than China or Russia, even if land areas are of similar scale.
This supports the original point that it’s hard for large countries to have robust train networks, which was the idea that was being challenged.
Did you not read the whole thread?
- lmm 4y ago> My point is that over that distance, any train is impractical? It is practical though. Those 21 trains a day to/from Urumqi aren't running empty; I'm sure part of the motivation was national pride (as with most megaprojects anywhere), but those high speed lines were built primarily because they're useful. > Like sure China has fast trains in a small area, but west of Chengdu, they don’t And yet, as per your own link and my response, train service west of Chengdu is still significantly better than in the US. The US being big and spread out is just an excuse.