Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
PurpleBoxDragon
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
17 ms
·
31.
▲
by
PurpleBoxDragon
8y ago
>They are not blocked. Self blocking in response to a law to avoid the penalties under the law is being blocked by the law.
32.
▲
by
PurpleBoxDragon
8y ago
Isn't it also possible for two numbers to have unequal expansions but still be equal? Take .3... * 3 vs 1. The first expands to .9... while the second expands to 1.0... but they are also equal.
33.
▲
by
PurpleBoxDragon
8y ago
>password fields are encrypted If you are encrypting your passwords you are already doing it wrong.
34.
▲
by
PurpleBoxDragon
8y ago
I don't think the issue is that 'good' dictators are so rare (one in a million), but that they are rare enough that two back to back is extremely rare and three back to back is beyond hope, even if each dictator tries their b
35.
▲
by
PurpleBoxDragon
8y ago
Does the developer not work on any systems unless they feel it is theirs, or is it a particular system that causes this phenomena? If it is the latter case, then the dev's reasoning is really a symptom of a deeper problem.
36.
▲
by
PurpleBoxDragon
8y ago
If I have to work 8 hours a day to make 6 hours of income because of tax, then 25% of the risk of me being killed in a day is because of the tax. Probably more, because the extra 2 hours of work will be while I'm more tired and will l
37.
▲
by
PurpleBoxDragon
8y ago
Tax budgets have a direct effect on people, and for people who have to work for a living, while it appears to be taking money, it is equivalently taking their time, a fraction of their life.
38.
▲
by
PurpleBoxDragon
8y ago
>This isn't the same thing. Where is the difference that would allow us to condemn the companies for maximizing profits by use labor laws but not condemn them for maximizing profits using tax laws? >Also nothing is that simple. Y
39.
▲
by
PurpleBoxDragon
8y ago
>Doge Isn't this an odd example to use since it was created to be a parody of cryptocurrency, or did I mix up my crypto-history?
40.
▲
by
PurpleBoxDragon
8y ago
If both were created at the same time, it would be a far different court case. I was assuming the case where the logo clearly predates the algorithm, because in that case you would get enough expert witnesses to testify that the logo was i
41.
▲
by
PurpleBoxDragon
8y ago
>I suppose Baldur's Gate† (the first one and its later expansion, not the second one which I didn't enjoy nearly as much) and games like Fallout or The Elder Scrolls series spoiled me I think this is really what happens. With
42.
▲
by
PurpleBoxDragon
8y ago
I have both of your experiences (with different games). I played many NES/SNES games a child, and experienced much awe and wonder, felt extreme freedom in what I could do, and was just sucked into the worlds crafted as a child. But d
43.
▲
by
PurpleBoxDragon
8y ago
What's like to happen? Given how low the probability of such an event is to happen by chance, if the algorithm is traced back to you then the court will find you guilty of creating the algorithm specifically to produce the image. In
44.
▲
by
PurpleBoxDragon
8y ago
Isn't this a bit over-reductionist, such as the people who claim that since all electronic images are represented by 0's and 1's images are just numbers and thus it is silly to ban an illegal image since it is just banning a
45.
▲
by
PurpleBoxDragon
8y ago
>Your comparison between comprehending financial principles (which are “not hard” according to you) with comprehending driving a car tells me you are severely disconnected from regular folks. People understand the concept of 'don&#x
46.
▲
by
PurpleBoxDragon
8y ago
>Then the wealth can be distributed to everyone fairly. Who determines what is fair?
47.
▲
by
PurpleBoxDragon
8y ago
>Asking average citizens to understand market volatility and diversification and to rely on the total abject falsehood that “markets just go up in value” is equally immoral. Why? We expect people who drive cars to understand the basics
48.
▲
by
PurpleBoxDragon
8y ago
>No, it should not be a rule Sorry for the confusion, I didn't mean for it to exist as an actual rule, just as an recommendation by the institution in question. Such as a campus police department giving out safety tips.
49.
▲
by
PurpleBoxDragon
8y ago
>Harassment is a crime. Which goes back to the other poster's question of where is the problem if it is a factual claim. Assuming they share in the same answer as you, it seems the problem occurs at the point where stating factual
50.
▲
by
PurpleBoxDragon
8y ago
>I would absolutely suggest that. For the sake of the person's safety that should be suggested, but where does one draw the line at such suggestions? College aged women are safer if they don't drink alcohol, so should that be
51.
▲
by
PurpleBoxDragon
8y ago
What about "I've heard Joe is a a deviant criminal"? The rumor does not have to be true for the statement (that the rumor was heard) to be true. What about "Joe has, at the time this sign was made, never denied beating
52.
▲
by
PurpleBoxDragon
8y ago
Is there any case law on this? Given it is a recording of video, not audio, how does the law treat the ability to convert video into audio? This would make most video recordings where audio is illegal to also be illegal, if it is so direc
53.
▲
by
PurpleBoxDragon
8y ago
I'm thinking of the same way that land you owned is taxed even if it isn't being used for anything, with a tax partially based on how much the market values the land (so land that is nowhere interesting is barely taxed while land
54.
▲
by
PurpleBoxDragon
8y ago
You can. You record a high definition video of items and can possibly determine the sound waves from the movement of the items. I've already seen demos of this tech where you can restore the majority of a transcript of a visually rec
55.
▲
by
PurpleBoxDragon
8y ago
But purchasing the time for a person to create a work for you generally does give you the rights, as a work for hire. Thus temporary tattoos would be copyrightable, but permanent ones that are created only once should not.
56.
▲
by
PurpleBoxDragon
8y ago
Especially since it escapes taxation. If you taxed IP like you do real property, we would see quite a different system form.
57.
▲
by
PurpleBoxDragon
8y ago
Not just copyright law. Look at the difference in laws being recording a video of a person and recording sound of the same person. I would love for law to be consistent, but as of yet there is no such requirement.
58.
▲
by
PurpleBoxDragon
8y ago
I don't really see it any different than stealing the concept of FPS from companies that came before, or from stealing the concept of video games from the original creators. I see no issue with it, much like I see no issue with all so
59.
▲
by
PurpleBoxDragon
8y ago
It has also been rolled back. I do not remember the specific case, but it dealt with the SOR requirements being extended on people long after they has been convicted and sentenced due to a change in SOR laws. The courts ruled that it did
60.
▲
by
PurpleBoxDragon
8y ago
b might not be so insane if you consider that tumblr is used by a lot of people who posts selfies. That would include a lot of teens/tweens. The problem with selfies is that they wouldn't be in anything like photoDNA and thus im
More ›