>Harassment is a crime. Which goes back to the other poster's question of where is the problem if it is a factual claim. Assuming they share in the same answe

>Harassment is a crime. Which goes back to the other poster's question of where is the problem if it is a factual claim. Assuming they share in the same answer as you, it seems the problem occurs at the point where stating factual statements crosses over into harassment. While a generic answer that I generally find agreeable, the devil is always in the details, no? Where exactly is that line, and is there still not a problem if someone behaves in manner that is extremely close to but not crossing that line?