Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
PierredeFermat
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
31.
▲
by
PierredeFermat
7y ago
But also HN is clearly not a startup and probably hasn't spent a cent on marketing. In fact, as far as I've learned, a lot of the work here involves stopping bad actors/users rather than finding ways to get users.
32.
▲
by
PierredeFermat
7y ago
Here's one on G Drive: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1NJ9bio4gz8AJ7RTmYGDKXiWJLCm... Let me know if this works for you
33.
▲
by
PierredeFermat
7y ago
You'll need to save the image in order to get it in full size. Sorry there's no other way around this.
34.
▲
Annotated Hacker News traffic since the beginning
(twitter.com)
155 points
by
PierredeFermat
7y ago
|
46 comments
35.
▲
by
PierredeFermat
7y ago
Perhaps it's worth noting that this is from 2018
36.
▲
by
PierredeFermat
7y ago
It's amazing that a similar concern is raised/discussed here just couple hours ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19788088 Any chance we could connect over email or something?
37.
▲
by
PierredeFermat
7y ago
I don't think the problem should be approached from a "great market" perspective. The market for Hacker News is quite niche. Yet, it has become a great community for the curious of us. Almost hardly replaceable by any of the
38.
▲
by
PierredeFermat
7y ago
tldr; I'd like to get in touch and do a deeper dive into the problem so that the solution can be refined. How can I reach out to you? > I am a little surprised, given the title, that the issue being highlighted is blogspam and the
39.
▲
by
PierredeFermat
7y ago
The URL to Scripps Research is obviously working now, after the story got its largest share of public attention from other websites. Truly disappointing.
40.
▲
How science journalism is broken and how can we all fix it
(medium.com)
17 points
by
PierredeFermat
7y ago
|
5 comments
41.
▲
by
PierredeFermat
8y ago
Was chatting about this with someone on Health News. I doubt it's lucky - the two compounds have been examined together in several previous studies; https://www.nature.com/articles/hr2005119 Are you a biologist by
42.
▲
by
PierredeFermat
8y ago
It's two compounds that they've identified; apocynin and Y-27632. A comment here ( https://news.nukleosome.com/t/anti-aging-discovery-could-lea... ) explains it a bit, quoting the authors; "We selected can
43.
▲
by
PierredeFermat
8y ago
From a comment here ( https://news.nukleosome.com/t/anti-aging-discovery-could-lea... ) quoting the study authors: "We selected candidate chemicals that potentially increased the stem cell property [Apocynin] or red
44.
▲
by
PierredeFermat
8y ago
No problem! What kind of prosthetics are you working on?
45.
▲
by
PierredeFermat
8y ago
You know, I think it is time that we argue about definitions. Many of them are starting to get loose.
46.
▲
by
PierredeFermat
8y ago
I'm not advocating against that, quite the opposite! My work involves solving exactly this class of problems and good privacy ensures such behavior does not take place. What I don't see is how changing the nomenclature to 'ow
47.
▲
by
PierredeFermat
8y ago
You can check the full original study and conclusion here: https://news.nukleosome.com/t/left-ventricular-structure-and...
48.
▲
by
PierredeFermat
8y ago
I didn't claim it's an enthusiastic one. My claim is that all the sudden "privacy-is-not-enough" arguments make it seem like some breach happened without our agreement. To use your words, it's almost as if they'
49.
▲
by
PierredeFermat
8y ago
How is it not true?
50.
▲
by
PierredeFermat
8y ago
Most, if not all, arguments on data ownership are arguments by analogy. This makes them ipso facto invalid. Using that same line of inductive reasoning, we could argue that we own the trash we generate, and that's not a reductio ad abs
51.
▲
by
PierredeFermat
8y ago
Of course, anything could be adjusted for recency if you adjust the scope. However, if you read new research everyday, that's far from recent. As for the probable 2 years period, it doesn't look like it is the case in the paper; &
52.
▲
by
PierredeFermat
8y ago
The original study ( https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.0202... ) is not recent as the article kicks off with; it was Received: 14 January 2018; Accepted: 02 October 2018; Published: 02 November
53.
▲
by
PierredeFermat
8y ago
It might be geographic proximity to Siberia and thus abundance of research material, which drives some funding to do more research which then drives more funding, etc.
54.
▲
28,000-year-old mammoth cells have shown reactivity in mouse egg cells
(nature.com)
68 points
by
PierredeFermat
8y ago
|
37 comments
55.
▲
by
PierredeFermat
8y ago
It is quite good indeed. Where do you see it lacking? Perhaps this is a blindspot for admins. The aim is to really have some good discussions from time to time. We definitely don’t want to make it a place to just dump links into.
56.
▲
by
PierredeFermat
8y ago
"[...] with about 5 [contributing] users." On the 'consuming' side, it's more than 20X of that. In any case, the raison d'être of this is to maintain a quality discourse around human health and biology. Why it
57.
▲
by
PierredeFermat
8y ago
Agreed although it may not apply for every community/community type. Looks like you listened to Masters of Scale recently? :)
58.
▲
by
PierredeFermat
8y ago
The reason we're leaving it at 'Latest' for now is because that's where the 'Welcome' post is pinned, which is important for people to get a sense of what it's all about and what does it stand for (i.e. mi
59.
▲
by
PierredeFermat
8y ago
Could you please shoot an email to one@nukleosome.com? Just mention that you came from HN.
60.
▲
by
PierredeFermat
8y ago
Yes. That would make sense
More ›