4 ms·
The original study (https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02029/full https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.0202...) is not r
by PierredeFermat 8y ago
The original study (https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02029/full https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.0202...) is not recent as the article kicks off with; it was Received: 14 January 2018; Accepted: 02 October 2018; Published: 02 November 2018.
Also, this seems to be observed only in those "who have low trait self-control".
Adjusting the title for those two points may be more helpful.
- ejstronge 8y agoIn the scope of research, that's super recent - it probably took the authors 2 years or more to conduct the research they described.
- PierredeFermat 8y agoOf course, anything could be adjusted for recency if you adjust the scope. However, if you read new research everyday, that's far from recent. As for the probable 2 years period, it doesn't look like it is the case in the paper; "Seventy one full-time employees participated [...] Participants completed a one-shot general electronic questionnaire"