Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
PathOfEclipse
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
91.
▲
by
PathOfEclipse
4y ago
> Do you really have to lie so transparently? Is that what you ask yourself every day you wake up? I guess you're living the golden rule then, aren't you? > We all certainly know you're lying you when you claim that des
92.
▲
by
PathOfEclipse
4y ago
I don't really care what you care about either. I directly challenged one of his claims. That is extremely obvious in my post. I only brought the 50% up later in response to another person's comment. So OP didn't even need to
93.
▲
by
PathOfEclipse
4y ago
It is not even remotely far from the "strongest possible interpretation" at all. It is a mainstream belief of the democrat party that Republicans are racist reprobates. Someone who won the popular vote for presidency of the United
94.
▲
by
PathOfEclipse
4y ago
Who are the censored racists that got freed under Musk? Did you view the links in my posts? Dr. Jay Bhattacharya is not a racist. Neither is the Babylon Bee. Neither is the attorney general of Texas. Neither is Jordan Peterson. These people
95.
▲
by
PathOfEclipse
4y ago
I don't know anything about Alex Jones other than that he is on the fringe. People on the fringe can mostly be ignored unless they become dangerous, and they do so be acquiring significant power and influence. The difference between th
96.
▲
by
PathOfEclipse
4y ago
I don't know anything about Alex Jones other than that he is on the fringe. People on the fringe can mostly be ignored unless they become dangerous, and they do so be acquiring significant power and influence. The difference between th
97.
▲
by
PathOfEclipse
4y ago
Yeah, I'm not going to give you the benefit of the doubt that you have terrible reading comprehension. You're probably just a very dishonest person. In my comment, I said "[racism] is something we can always improve on",
98.
▲
by
PathOfEclipse
4y ago
The only people mindlessly, and without evidence, calling others racists for the past 30 years are Democrats in reference to Republicans. My inference is not even remotely a stretch or controversial and is likely 100% correct. Furthermore,
99.
▲
by
PathOfEclipse
4y ago
I feel again like you're not comprehending what I wrote, and I'm going to assume you're not intentionally being dishonest in doing so. > without mindlessly discarding everything else the person said. It's a good thing
100.
▲
by
PathOfEclipse
4y ago
Sorry, but saying I don't trust your paragraph of claims because I know at least one of those claims is grotesque and false doesn't shut down debate. More importantly, the point needs to be expressed. No one should get away with a
101.
▲
by
PathOfEclipse
4y ago
The only people today who see others as less than human are the same people who falsely demonize others as racists. The whole point of demonization is to enable you to view your opponent, not as a human, but as a demon. The evidence can
102.
▲
by
PathOfEclipse
4y ago
When these people are banned for saying things that at least half of America agrees with, then it implicates more than just those banned people.
103.
▲
by
PathOfEclipse
4y ago
When someone calls essentially half the population as "reprobates" and "racists", then please explain how my tone and my response is inappropriate? It is more than appropriate! It is far past time to call out that the ac
104.
▲
by
PathOfEclipse
4y ago
Did I say they were invalid, or that I no longer trust him and would need to corroborate with other sources? I swear people on the left either have really bad reading comprehension, or just make a habit of twisting and distorting other peop
105.
▲
by
PathOfEclipse
4y ago
Nonononono when two related things happen in sequence, one must have caused the other! But seriously, I can't think of any principle ignored more often than correlation != causation. It seems to be the easiest way to trick people into
106.
▲
by
PathOfEclipse
4y ago
These two sentences are not the same: You : [Sowell] has literally claimed that Black Americans were better off during slavery than they are today Sowell : If we are to go by evidence of social retrogression, liberals have wreaked more ha
107.
▲
by
PathOfEclipse
4y ago
I called your action evil. So now I believe you either have poor reading comprehension or you're just habitually dishonest. Do you have any other explanations for your behavior? And, frankly, pointing out that someone's statement
108.
▲
by
PathOfEclipse
4y ago
No, I will do this here. In the best case, you were mistaken. It is still a very evil thing to defame someone with such a horrible accusation when you couldn't even be bothered to take two minutes to get your facts straight! It took me
109.
▲
by
PathOfEclipse
4y ago
Personally, I wouldn't blatantly tell obvious lies. I clicked on the link. Sowell didn't say that at all. But I have to admit, that's a new one. Falsely claim someone said something awful, then provide a link to make it look
110.
▲
by
PathOfEclipse
4y ago
Diversity should be natural, not forced. DEI forces diversity, which causes more problems than it solves and harms more people than it helps. It's been this way forever, including back when it was called "affirmative action."
111.
▲
by
PathOfEclipse
4y ago
It's probably an opinion because it's not provably true. There is no mainstream Nazi party today so I don't understand how your example is meaningful or relevant. Anyways, if you're in the U.S., I assume you're refe
112.
▲
by
PathOfEclipse
4y ago
We went wrong with Electron in particular: https://www.electronjs.org/ . I am convinced this framework alone is responsible for more performance loss on the desktop than any other single thing.
113.
▲
by
PathOfEclipse
4y ago
> No, no religion on my end. I am definitely not surprised. Atheists seem to be the loudest about proclaiming positive rights. And, yet, it is within atheist governments where people are least likely to experience these "rights"
114.
▲
by
PathOfEclipse
4y ago
> "The clinical presentation of myopericarditis after vaccination was usually mild and temporary, with all cases fully recovering within 14 days." The sample size of the study was far too small to estimate risk of serious illne
115.
▲
by
PathOfEclipse
4y ago
Nothing is free. Some things are just paid for in other ways like taxes, debt, and inflation. Also, I know zero people personally who've been seeiously affected by COVID. However,I personally know one pro vaccine person who was hospita
116.
▲
by
PathOfEclipse
4y ago
For Norway, Could it be related to the fact that Norway had a cash-for-care policy much earlier that was used by 91% of citizens? https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318121531_The_rise_... Using cash-for-care, as
117.
▲
by
PathOfEclipse
4y ago
> Shockingly I have concern for the quality of life of said kids. But do you really? Because, for instance, children in Sweden have shown a far more rapid decline in mental health than in other similar Nordic countries without government
118.
▲
by
PathOfEclipse
4y ago
Ah, the good ol' "Republicans have no solutions" trope. I have lots of solutions! Belief in God results in increased fertility rates: https://www.guttmacher.org/journals/psrh/2015/02/associ
119.
▲
by
PathOfEclipse
4y ago
You did a great job of misinterpreting what I said, but what I said is true and not even remotely psychotic. If anything, your reaction is a little crazy! I would like to note that you had no counterargument. You surely don't have a ri
120.
▲
by
PathOfEclipse
4y ago
> Do you agree that you can choose to not follow the law? Not only can you do not follow a law, but people in power do it successfully today. Immigration law is the obvious example. Those in power flout the law so blatantly that the law
More ›