I don't really care what you care about either. I directly challenged one of his claims. That is extremely obvious in my post. I only brought the 50% up later i

I don't really care what you care about either. I directly challenged one of his claims. That is extremely obvious in my post. I only brought the 50% up later in response to another person's comment. So OP didn't even need to address that directly. You are the one now not taking people's words at face value, and therefore violating HN guidelines based on your own intepretations. > Great, focus on that instead of something that just plain wasn't said in this comment thread. That was my focus. How well did you read my original comment? > You also never "challenged his claim". I certainly did. I said I no longer trust him because of his claim. How much stronger of a challenge could you get than that? > and then immediately flew off on a tangent based on something that wasn't said False. > Don't hallucinate things into this thread that wasn't said If you think mainstream beliefs held by people in society who make similar statements isn't relevant context to an Internet discussion, then you and I probably aren't going to agree on much.