Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
OrigamiPastrami
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
31.
▲
by
OrigamiPastrami
2y ago
Why solve a problem for real when pretending to solve it is so much more profitable?
32.
▲
by
OrigamiPastrami
2y ago
> Perhaps you bring in a CEO who has a 90% chance of tripling the company’s revenue/growth and a 10% chance of leading the company to failure. I realize these are hypothetical numbers, but they're so clearly backwards. It'
33.
▲
by
OrigamiPastrami
2y ago
> hoofed animals can only walk or sprint Horses have more than two speeds. They can walk, trot, gait, gallup.
34.
▲
by
OrigamiPastrami
2y ago
I only spent a few minutes on Google so you'd have to do your own research since I am not familiar with the Tiguan although I know the MQB platform it's built on. Anyway for the Tiguan you might have to actually order a part, the
35.
▲
by
OrigamiPastrami
2y ago
The neat thing about the Haldex is that with just a software tune you can substantially improve the performance of it. The hardware is actually far more capable than you'd ever know with the enormous amount of slack that's progra
36.
▲
by
OrigamiPastrami
2y ago
> Current search is great for facts, alright for generic questions, and annoying for answering something. I feel like Google used to be pretty great at answering questions until they started pushing ads more aggressively into their resul
37.
▲
by
OrigamiPastrami
2y ago
> OpenAI isn't run by idiots All of the management drama in the past year would suggest otherwise. Sometimes people we think are smart turn out to not always be so smart.
38.
▲
by
OrigamiPastrami
2y ago
> Today we're valued at more than that number and Alexa's core experience hasn't changed in the past year. They haven't been able to copy us. The Alexa leadership team has some hubris IMO. I can't really evaluate
39.
▲
by
OrigamiPastrami
2y ago
> It really boggles my mind that there are people who are capable enough to be in the competition and still decide to cheat in order to win. Not because it’s immoral or dishonourable or anything like that, but just because it’s so fuckin
40.
▲
by
OrigamiPastrami
2y ago
I'm not even sure most people on HN feel that way, although there's plenty of criticism here. Most of the time I use ChatGPT I become genuinely upset within a few minutes because it's so brazenly awful and regularly ignores
41.
▲
by
OrigamiPastrami
2y ago
> You either need enough data for it to be statistically significant I guess this wasn't clear, but I thought this was implied. When I said it's "more likely" I meant you can quantify it. You are correct of course.
42.
▲
by
OrigamiPastrami
2y ago
I'm not trying to lie and I'm aware my data isn't perfect, but I'm the only one providing any data at all so far. I have repeatedly asked for better data and been denied. I can only analyze the data I have, imperfect t
43.
▲
by
OrigamiPastrami
2y ago
You were the one originally implying Airbus is as dangerous as Boeing, so the burden of proof is on you. I'll take this as confirmation you have no data to support your claim. Cheers.
44.
▲
by
OrigamiPastrami
2y ago
You never asked me for data, you were just implying Boeing isn't as bad as everyone says. So I said let's quantify it. And then you started getting upset with the data presented to you. I said to provide better data if you have
45.
▲
by
OrigamiPastrami
2y ago
If you have no data to support your argument, then you have no argument. I asked you how many crashes per mile and you ignored it. I asked if you have a better metric and you ignored it. I'm open to my infographic being misleading,
46.
▲
by
OrigamiPastrami
2y ago
Well let's quantify it. How many crashes per miles are there for Boeing vs Airbus? And if per mile is not the correct metric, what is? I found this infographic after a quick search which implies Boeing is a lot worse than Airbus. h
47.
▲
by
OrigamiPastrami
2y ago
> It's easy to forget that, while they are political appointees, they have to have fairly long careers as acting judges to even qualify for the appointments. This is objectively false. There are no requirements like this and there
48.
▲
by
OrigamiPastrami
2y ago
So you're saying there will be a higher price point for the users that want a clean ride?
49.
▲
by
OrigamiPastrami
2y ago
I'd argue it only demonstrates that it doesn't produce much value for the creator.
50.
▲
by
OrigamiPastrami
2y ago
> and that's a generase adjective 'generase' is one of the weirder typos I've seen
51.
▲
by
OrigamiPastrami
2y ago
It's the internet. There is no source more cited than "trust me bro"
52.
▲
by
OrigamiPastrami
2y ago
https://old.reddit.com/r/todayilearned/comments/1chqvq7/til_... This was on the front page of reddit today.
53.
▲
by
OrigamiPastrami
2y ago
> before we get a central bank that exists for the American people and not capital that operates in America The USA is arguably the most capitalistic country/culture/society on Earth, and you're wondering how long it will
54.
▲
by
OrigamiPastrami
2y ago
> I'll suggest it to my youtuber friends. Ah, now I see the problem. You get your information from clickbait YouTube videos instead of actually trying to learn things. I'd point out more ways you're wrong, but you don
55.
▲
by
OrigamiPastrami
2y ago
I think it's funny you're objectively wrong but continue to insist you're right. Anyway, I'm not gonna waste any more time correcting someone that's allergic to learning.
56.
▲
by
OrigamiPastrami
2y ago
Having fewer wheels does not mean you have more traction - contrary to popular belief, a racecar can trivially out-brake a MotoGP bike despite weighing an order of magnitude more. The contact patch size matters more than the number of cont
57.
▲
by
OrigamiPastrami
2y ago
You might want to challenge your assumptions and learn something in the process. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/11/opinion/editorials/tokyo-...
58.
▲
by
OrigamiPastrami
2y ago
Why do you assume Japan is the same as Europe?
59.
▲
by
OrigamiPastrami
3y ago
Huh?
60.
▲
by
OrigamiPastrami
3y ago
I think it's mostly an issue of experience. Younger engineers tend to make things more complicated than they need to be and are unaware of reliability issues. Older engineers better understand tried-and-true systems and are more like
More ›