> You either need enough data for it to be statistically significant I guess this wasn't clear, but I thought this was implied. When I said it's "more likely"

> You either need enough data for it to be statistically significant I guess this wasn't clear, but I thought this was implied. When I said it's "more likely" I meant you can quantify it. You are correct of course. Also I agree with everything else you're saying in principle. I kinda feel like we just started the conversation with a misunderstanding about shared assumptions and likely agree with each other.