O__________O

8 ms·

61.
by O__________O 4y ago
Possible this is not significant, appears that within the feature set is a text-to-vector image generator that produces editable vectors art. There’s no direct link I was able to find, but feature is listed here: https://firefly.
62.
by O__________O 4y ago
Anyone able to comment on where in their opinion the measure is for current state of copyright law when generative AI is a subset of an image?
63.
by O__________O 4y ago
TLDR: @OP - To me, any logical code that blocks users from doing something and impacts users needs an error message on what happened, why it’s blocked, and how to fix it. If user is engaging in common way of using system you have decided to
64.
The Benefits of Dyslexic Thinking(youtube.com)
1 points by O__________O 4y ago|0 comments
65.
by O__________O 4y ago
OpenAI’s status page: https://status.openai.com/
66.
by O__________O 4y ago
Title was editorialized, original actual representation papers intent and content: “PHYSICAL CONSTRAINTS ON UNIDENTIFIED AERIAL PHENOMENA”
67.
by O__________O 4y ago
I too have interest in dynamics of communities. Also my position that it’s healthy to expect community members to understand the economics, behavioral aspects, etc of community. For example, while I don’t likely do it as much as I should, I
68.
by O__________O 4y ago
Thank you for the clarification, sincerely appreciate you taking the time to share your understanding.
69.
by O__________O 4y ago
Source?
70.
by O__________O 4y ago
>> It's not surprising this is flagged. If you read the recommendations, discussions of downvoting (and flagging certainly counts) are not welcome because they're circular, uninteresting, and don't contribute positively
71.
by O__________O 4y ago
Understand, specifically “show dead” — but that’s not a list of ONLY flagged comments or ONLY flagged submissions — nor is it from those lists easy to get context of why they’re flagged or easy to vouch to unflagged them; to unflagged item,
72.
by O__________O 4y ago
Feel free to explain disconnect between downvotes requiring 500 rep - but flagging only requiring 31 rep.
73.
by O__________O 4y ago
Obviously there are numerous valid reasons to flag submissions, many of which Dang automatically does — issue is the invalid reasons.
74.
by O__________O 4y ago
>> Do those who have over 500 karma points, any better at remaining objective when they consider down voting a post? Understand your point, but ease of which abusing the system is to simple. I could easily automate creating 100s of ac
75.
by O__________O 4y ago
>> It appears flags when used in a non abusive manner almost only apply to submissions and not comments. This is in accurate, though as is, agree that it’s hard to see as a result of HN not having a public log and reporting of flags.
76.
by O__________O 4y ago
And this submission is FLAGGED — how specifically is it a violation on HN’s guidelines? This is toxic - and claim that some how Dang is able to moderate the toxicity is telling — as is the claim the HN is a community based on spirit of curi
77.
by O__________O 4y ago
Down voting of submissions is not possible — unless a user flags a submission, which is NOT what flags are for, they’re for flagging the violation HN guidelines.
78.
by O__________O 4y ago
No, all the following an more is possible: public logs of flags, admin logging of rules viewed by users to do X action, requiring flags be tied to an existing rule, having flags audited users, banning flagging rights from users abusing them
79.
by O__________O 4y ago
Flags are NOT votes — which is part of the problem, HN treats flags as votes and users are abusing it. Down voting is not even possible for submissions unless you flag a submission. Down votes on comments is not possible unless you have 500
80.
by O__________O 4y ago
Agree, which is why I posted this, but to me at the point any pattern is toxic to the spirit of HN — Dang has a responsibility as the only official moderator to address it.
81.
Ask HN: Why is the abuse of flagging allowed?
5 points by O__________O 4y ago|28 comments
82.
by O__________O 4y ago
Thanks, agree with all your points, though at some point unless others are agreeing with me, 100% sure it would feel like I am dead set on my position, which I am not, and happy to reasonably assess any points made by others.
83.
by O__________O 4y ago
IWC’s mission: “provide for the proper conservation of whale stocks and thus make possible the orderly development of the whaling industry” — what it actually should be - “do not impact whales in any form” Love YC, might be wrong, but top 2
84.
by O__________O 4y ago
To the side that kills fish? Even fish that eat fish still wanna be the ones doing the killing and eating. Am I missing something?
85.
by O__________O 4y ago
Think it’s much more likely meat eaters would be the ones doing the killing.
86.
by O__________O 4y ago
It’s a stretch to think any country would go to war to prevent the crimes they to commit.
87.
by O__________O 4y ago
Might be wrong, but would be surprised if this worked, given Chinese Navy for example frequently escorts fishing boats, so I assume if sinking ships became common China would just sink any unflagged ships as pirates ghost ships.
88.
by O__________O 4y ago
Or, just teach fish how to sink ships and supplies to do so: https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_marine_mammal
89.
by O__________O 4y ago
First, I agree your list is a better source, though India offsets the Asian countries you mentioned. As for populations being irresponsible, please feel free to explain your reasoning behind this claim, since unless I am missing something,
90.
by O__________O 4y ago
Sorry, read the edits, but you’re ignoring the part where union members are contributing to the problem and have provided no explanation of how or why the union members would become part of the solution. Happy to try to understand, here’s e

More ›