NoOneNew

45 ms·

331.
by NoOneNew 6y ago
Theres a very large 3rd party armored car industry. Low key cars are very common. I dont know if this was or not, that image looks like it wasn't or was real cheap.
332.
by NoOneNew 6y ago
Precedent? Hi, welcome to planet Earth. We humans are literally the most dangerous organism on this planet. After we perfected murdering other animals with spears and arrows, we took to killing each other. That got boring so we started bori
333.
by NoOneNew 6y ago
Yea, it's still cheaper, faster and easier to use a 12 man hunter/killer team of knuckle draggers or even crayon munchers than to use what's described in the article. When Israel bombed a heavy water facility in Iran, they di
334.
by NoOneNew 6y ago
Fair, but ap 9mms aren't that bad. Also, I'm just laying down a template, I dont claim to have any insider info. We can even argue if their sidearms were Jerichos or P320s. I'm not too concerned on weapon specifics. It does l
335.
by NoOneNew 6y ago
Lol right? The system they're trying to convey is such a logistical and dev nightmare. Plus, it's also funny how the media likes to portray US and Israel intel agencies are either completely incompetent or omnipotent when it suits
336.
by NoOneNew 6y ago
Also, just like other specialty lics/certs, I want them to command much higher salaries. Increases the cost of even trying to exploit personal data. The company needs a real damn good reason to do so. Taxes, re-certs and randomized aud
337.
by NoOneNew 6y ago
>For some reason HN has this bizarre view of the world where it's full of pyschopaths out there to exploit developers. Yea, I've noticed that too. I attribute it to most devs are not assertive, then add in the fetishization of
338.
by NoOneNew 6y ago
I dont know how feasible it would be, but an official lic/cert to allow someone to see personal data (I assume data with name, location and other sensitive data like credit card, social security num, etc) is extremely interesting. Pret
339.
by NoOneNew 6y ago
The thing that isn't talked about is the function of a personal vehicle. A car is a major contributing factor to personal freedom. You are able to travel short to long distances on YOUR schedule, not someone else's. The biggest is
340.
by NoOneNew 6y ago
Wtf? So you take the statement that we can recover and shouldn't believe in doomsday as let's just kill each other? What are you, a Stalinist? You realize the rhetoric of life being over as we know it is increasing suicide rates.
341.
by NoOneNew 6y ago
The us population in 1918 was about 100 million. It's now about 330m. We have 3 times plus the population since world war 1. 116k americans died in ww1 with a 100m population. 271k died of covid with a 330m population. One death is one
342.
by NoOneNew 6y ago
Not in control, we just aren't fully at their whim like we used to. We have advanced warning systems for storms. Systems that weren't even a fantasy prior to 1920. Now we have evacuation infrastructure, shelters, preparedness plan
343.
by NoOneNew 6y ago
So I do understand your viewpoint because I absolutely shared it in the past and at no point do I want you to think that I'm about to speak down at you. A lot of people have never been in a real life scenario to experience the actual d
344.
by NoOneNew 6y ago
They're publicly traded. Their revenue sources are open for the public to read. The other guy saying they're diversified linked to their quarterly to show 80% ad revenue. That's pretty much "they're an ad company&qu
345.
by NoOneNew 6y ago
Being "well diversified" is subjective. But in freelance/contracting, the rule of thumb is to never have a customer account for more than 25% of your yearly income. You diversify your client base so when one walks away, it&#x
346.
by NoOneNew 6y ago
No, of course it's not all of life. But it's base factors. Kind of like basic survival situations. You need shelter, water and food. If you dont have that, you're chances of long term survival and/or happiness are close
347.
by NoOneNew 6y ago
A majority of people dont do bad deeds because they're "good hearted". They dont murder or steal because they're afraid of the consequences. Theres plenty of folks you want to punch in the face. Maybe once, twice or unti
348.
by NoOneNew 6y ago
Yes, but what about the people who did? Here's the thing, Google is a big company. When a big company offers a service or product you expect a long shelf life so you can justify the time/money investment to use it. If you stumble
349.
by NoOneNew 6y ago
Yay, someone else that's sober. I dont understand the constant need to radicalize every problem as we technically are "fixing" things. Less war, less natural cause deaths other than old age, less world wide poverty, the world
350.
by NoOneNew 6y ago
Agreed that the sooner your caffeine cutoff is, the better. I used to do 7pm with poor results. I find 5pm and going to bed at around 11pm to be fine. I normally finish drinking caffeine at around noon. Just 5 is my hard cutoff no matter wh
351.
by NoOneNew 6y ago
Yea... so I used to do the whole nap thing too. I still always felt groggy and had a head fog. For the last 2 years I decided to discipline myself to get roughly 8 hours of sleep every night (a sleep mask to block out excess light has been
352.
by NoOneNew 6y ago
Dude, canning is a lot like cooking. You get to make exactly what you want instead of being at the whim of someone else's choices thousands of miles away. There are still people who like doing for themselves. I know it's hard to i
353.
by NoOneNew 6y ago
So social media creating artificial strife amongst people has been a good change? Yea, theres some good from social media, but it seems to constantly require "change". Even in perfectly peaceful circles of societies, its dividing
354.
by NoOneNew 6y ago
I agree with you too. I think it's a mix of exec and management dont fully grasp the job and its implications if you shortcut too much. At the same time, too many data sci are in it for the keyword/sexiness of the job and are not
355.
by NoOneNew 6y ago
Okay, how is my argument changed if I answer yes or no? Is what you're talking about a data sci's responsibility or not? If collecting, analyzing and deploying data in reports or db is too difficult for you, data sci isn't fo
356.
by NoOneNew 6y ago
>The problem is that real world, physical business data is taken from what one can get, not what one would want. Yea, sorry, but part of your job in data sci is to collect the right data. Data doesn't magically exist and we are not
357.
by NoOneNew 6y ago
Your comment will forever be under rated due to how spot on it is. It's a fundamental issue in tech that people don't appreciate. While yes, some problems are universal and general tech can solve them without industry experience,
358.
by NoOneNew 6y ago
And you're falling into the trap of "everything works in theory". Dont pretend the real world is a clear cut place. Boots on the ground experience breats armchair keyboard academics.
359.
by NoOneNew 6y ago
You mean have a business that's sustained by the general public and market instead of continous arbitrary funding? What kind of sick psycho are you?
360.
by NoOneNew 6y ago
That's fair, but there's another problem. It's hard enough to find a regular educator that's qualified to teach kids about computers on a Windows or Apple. Linux is going to be easier?

More ›