NoFactualActual

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by NoFactualActual 4y ago

   I'm still not quite clear what qualifies this as "spam" given that you need to opt into viewing the tweets. It seems like a clear-cut case of impersonation. Spam is an entirely different concept that cannot be reduced to &quo
2. 2.▲
   by NoFactualActual 4y ago

   I'm not sure it's "spam" if you have to find it. Surely twitter ads are far closer to email spam than someone impersonating another person.
3. 3.▲
   by NoFactualActual 4y ago

   Doesn't apple own an ad network? You can't even restrict which apps are allowed to use the internet in the first place, which is a gaping security hole in the context of protecting you from the apps you have on your phone. They ar
4. 4.▲
   by NoFactualActual 4y ago

   Seems like a language thing—I'd distinguish the initial "design" from the iterative "engineering". Of course, you could describe the latter as design, too, but it's an ambiguous word (like most words). The peop
5. 5.▲
   by NoFactualActual 4y ago

   > The post includes tons of details about complicated things Patreon is doing to help out the people affected I was under the impression we were addressing "Jack"'s claim to responsibility. I wasn't trying to comment
6. 6.▲
   by NoFactualActual 4y ago

   > He's taking responsibility...and taking corrective action for the long term health and viability of the business. Maybe this is just a language thing, but in my world "taking responsibility" involves some action to perso