Nimitz14

35 ms·

391.
by Nimitz14 7y ago
You 100% tuned your hyper parameters and LM for librespeech, and only using librispeech data probably helped the result. When you start training systems for LVCSR it's normal for the WER to go up on some test sets. (This is why you can
392.
by Nimitz14 7y ago
If you're okay with living in a shared accomodation and have to skills to do remote work it's doable.
393.
To Serve Is to Rule: Why We Miss the WASPs(harpers.org)
3 points by Nimitz14 7y ago|0 comments
394.
by Nimitz14 7y ago
Hm. I don't feel like additional engineering expertise is what's missing to achieve AGI, there's still a lot more science to do I think, and I'm not sure how good Carmack is at that.
395.
by Nimitz14 7y ago
This is wrong. See posts here from ptitdrogo: https://www.reddit.com/r/starcraft/comments/d4n3tw/alphastar... > People oversaturated in wol and hots because you didn't expand a lot in these games
396.
by Nimitz14 7y ago
I don't think you understood his point. A player doesn't need to have seen a strategy before to react correctly to it. Sometimes a player will pull something completely unexpected out of a hat and lose, because the other guy r
397.
by Nimitz14 7y ago
They're framing it positively to distract from the fact they can't do it, the reality is they've spent millions of $ on compute and yet their agent is still terrible at strategy (and tactics sometimes too), they probably deci
398.
by Nimitz14 7y ago
Funny how they put it as: > When watching replays of these matches, players noticed that the account owner was performing actions that would be extremely difficult, if not impossible, for a human. framing it like the agent was doing some
399.
by Nimitz14 7y ago
The title seems to contradict the subtitle: > Google AI beats top human players at strategy game StarCraft II vs > DeepMind’s AlphaStar beat all but the very best humans at the fast-paced sci-fi video game.
400.
by Nimitz14 7y ago
I think you made a lot of good points. And am disappointed that so many people who replied to you ignored that you were in favour of supporting low income individuals. Let me add another point: There is a class of people who will never go t
401.
by Nimitz14 7y ago
That was very interesting! I really sympathize with his goal of interviewing people with the intent of getting an unforced explanation for whatever the interviewee has or is supporting. Adversarial interviews are more entertaining for sure,
402.
by Nimitz14 7y ago
So you just accept using a 2nd rate C++ IDE? Because there isn't any debate, Visual Studio is the best.
403.
by Nimitz14 7y ago
They 100% are. They're not even close.
404.
by Nimitz14 7y ago
Definitely. As someone with a father on the spectrum the current trend of "Autism acceptance" drives me nuts.
405.
by Nimitz14 7y ago
Yeah I was hoping Nim would be it but I don't like the syntax they use.
406.
by Nimitz14 7y ago
> When people go and talk to women who started out in the tech pipeline but left, many say that the reasons they left are that they felt unwelcome in some way: they were harassed, under-valued, talked over, stalked, underpaid, etc. That
407.
by Nimitz14 7y ago
Yes yes yes! I've been anticipating this for so long. However I'm a bit skeptical about doing quantization after training, in my experience you have to do quantization-aware training for there not be a large performance decrease.
408.
by Nimitz14 7y ago
Anybody who doesn't grasp why location-adjusted salaries are a thing is probably not worth hiring.
409.
by Nimitz14 7y ago
Thanks this is what I went with.
410.
by Nimitz14 7y ago
Let's say you are recording and processing audio in realtime. You have one function available which runs on a separate thread and provides you with the samples (fixed number every call). As I understand this article (and similar ones),
411.
by Nimitz14 7y ago
Yeah I find it a bit ridiculous how many there are.. it's like every major speech group has their own now.
412.
by Nimitz14 7y ago
In contrast to the other commentators here, I enjoyed that! Thanks
413.
by Nimitz14 7y ago
I agree with you. I feel a like optimizing metrics often leads to an overall worse product, but which, thanks to the actions of a minority of users who respond strongly to the change (while the rest grumble but don't change their behav
414.
by Nimitz14 7y ago
Or viewed from another perspective (the person initiating) a request for someone else to accept the changes you are pushing.
415.
by Nimitz14 7y ago
But it's wrong. It's actually a "push" instead of "pull", the direction is away from what you're doing not towards you!
416.
by Nimitz14 7y ago
That's not at all what he's saying. Maybe understand the article first before calling it nonsense. Kind of funny how all you people are making his point for him!
417.
by Nimitz14 7y ago
I think you dropped an /s
418.
by Nimitz14 7y ago
Uh isn't blemishes actually a sign that the fruit is tastier?
419.
by Nimitz14 7y ago
Yeah, based on my experience with android and tensorflow they fail spectacularly at it.
420.
by Nimitz14 7y ago
Are your acoustic models 400MB?

More ›