Narkov

7 ms·

31.
by Narkov 3y ago
There's no way OWASP don't know the difference between "the [entire] Internet" and "our website". I believe their intentions are to tone down the fear that people may have. It's gaslighting.
32.
by Narkov 3y ago
> OWASP has already removed your information from the Internet, so no immediate action on your part is required. What...of all organisations who should know this to be completely untrue. You cannot guarantee that breached data has been r
33.
by Narkov 3y ago
Large retailers were doing this a decade ago. Doesn't MAC randomization used by both Apple and Android devices make this redundant?
34.
by Narkov 3y ago
Does survivor bias account for this? Only the best/most worthwhile videos from the "old times" are archived. Right now, we see every piece of crap uploaded to YouTube. No doubt there's awesome video content being created
35.
by Narkov 3y ago
Just need some context here...one of the biggest companies in the world, ever, with all the financial and legal resources available to them, and you think they aren't playing 5D chess?
36.
by Narkov 3y ago
> when pi-hole blocks the ad's DNS query, macOS will treat that as a DNS failure and use DNS Server 2 as a fallback. Resulting in the ad being shown. My experience with OSX and Pi-Hole doesn't match your experience. There'
37.
by Narkov 3y ago
A simpler solution: Deploy one Pi-Hole instance and then set clients to use Pi-Hole as the primary resolver and your ISP/router as the secondary. In the rare circumstance that the Pi-Hole device is down, you fallback and get the "
38.
by Narkov 3y ago
Money transfer, or any non-revocable transaction for that matter, should require multiple sign-offs (a.k.a "two/X to sign"). Businesses have been using this for decades. This problem isn't a technical one..it's a pr
39.
by Narkov 3y ago
Not necessarily disagreeing with your assessment but I guess all these things are about statistical probabilities. If the chance of this happening is small enough and the possible "worst case" outcome is tolerable, it gets a tick.
40.
by Narkov 3y ago
> How many 5000+ constellations will there be around the planet before we run into space congestion/traffic and aesthetic problems? I think you underestimate just how big space is.
41.
by Narkov 3y ago
To be fair, it looks like it was only patched in the last 24 hours so not totally unreasonable...yet.
42.
by Narkov 3y ago
> What is free and open source by the way? Their client? What about their server they store your password? (I assume you can sync that to their server, I’m not their customer.) You didn't even bother to click the link and educate yo
43.
by Narkov 3y ago
> Why not use some better and entirely open solution, like pass? Bitwarden is entirely open source?! https://github.com/bitwarden/ You aren't even locked in to using them as the data store.
44.
by Narkov 3y ago
> Headcount was 66,185 as of September 30, 2023, a decrease of 24% year-over-year. Huge for a single year.
45.
by Narkov 3y ago
IMHO, Accidents...manageable. Hitting a pedestrian...still manageable. Deliberately withholding evidence....burn them at the stake and regulate them to an inch of their corporate lives.
46.
by Narkov 3y ago
Price increases are just one way you can get screwed. You can also lose out when your provider doesn't drop prices or pick up operating efficiencies that other providers have.
47.
by Narkov 3y ago
^ this. In Queensland, Australia, your family home (principal place of residence) is exempt and any other property gets no land tax up to a certain personal land holding value ($600k?). Once you go over the threshold, it's a percentage
48.
by Narkov 3y ago
Go on...what are people paying then? More or less?
49.
by Narkov 3y ago
A subtle detail from the article is that address prices peaked in 2021 at $60 and has steadily decreased to $35. Where does it go from here? Is this a proxy for the tech correction?
50.
by Narkov 3y ago
> How far removed from the problem do you have to be to think one hundred million dollars is not going to effect anyone? If $10b is at risk, $100m is not a lot for an insurance policy.
51.
by Narkov 3y ago
They don't own a business...they own a job.
52.
by Narkov 3y ago
> There's been a setting for users to disable 2G for forever, I don't think this setting does what you think it does. The description under this option has a big caveat: "For emergency calls, 2G is always allowed". So
53.
by Narkov 3y ago
> If you’re that stupid, you deserve to be swindled. Absolutely not. Laws should protect the vulnerable...no matter how stupid they are.
54.
by Narkov 3y ago
> Is this not quite risky for banks? Not that banks taking a risk is bad, but it seems a very long bet for them. Not really. Mortgages are (mostly) bundled and on-sold to investors which assume the risk of default and interest rate chang
55.
by Narkov 3y ago
You must remember, the US is very late to the "instant" payment party. This isn't a groundbreaking development.
56.
by Narkov 3y ago
So easy to say, so hard to actually do. Most HN readers wouldn't care about dropping $100 but the fact is Facebook, Reddit, Google users pay $0.
57.
by Narkov 3y ago
In this example, it is not a diagnosis tool. It is a communication tool with "stakeholders".
58.
by Narkov 3y ago
> That the banks all put in money to build a bunch of houses and then give them away for free? Housing supply is a massive issue in Australia. This takes investment from developers to buy bulk land, subdivide, permit, build and then se
59.
by Narkov 3y ago
This is a misinterpretation, IMHO. You are assuming from the attendee list that this is about these banks and super funds outright owning the housing asset whereas a more reasonable interpretation is about those organisations funding constr
60.
by Narkov 3y ago
It's hard to go broke making a profit.

More ›