Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Naritai
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
40 ms
·
151.
▲
by
Naritai
10y ago
For example, the new law could say that getting a ticket for running a red light would result in revocation of your license. As opposed to just a monetary fine / points like typically awarded now.
152.
▲
by
Naritai
10y ago
Not really, because exactly that: car=freedom. That will continue to be true, but it will not be 'drivers license = freedom'. People who lose their license will need to use a self-driving car.
153.
▲
by
Naritai
10y ago
'make licensing more strict' is basically going to bring the standard up to the level of machines anyway... every time there is an accident, lawmakers will create '<victim name>s law', which tightens the requiremen
154.
▲
by
Naritai
10y ago
Are you the last person in SV to hear that Google offers catered lunch & free food?
155.
▲
by
Naritai
10y ago
? OP calls out a specific motivation. The motivation of the subgroup references is very clear. It's you who is trying to expand that to a generalization.
156.
▲
by
Naritai
10y ago
And those people are exactly the problem. They are willing to throw away the Supreme Court, climate change, and fair immigration all over a perceived personal slight.
157.
▲
by
Naritai
10y ago
The 23,650 people who get jobs in that development but have nowhere to live. These people end up having to live a 2hr drive or 2.5hr mass transit ride away - or, maybe they can save up for 15 years so they can afford a 1bdm nearby. Intent
158.
▲
by
Naritai
10y ago
Experiences varied wildly. For employees, it was a terrible time. Large companies were laying off left and right, and Sequoia did indeed advise all CEOs to fire their devs if their product was already on the market. However, since the sto
159.
▲
by
Naritai
10y ago
Regardless of what speakers of those languages do, we can do everything we can to remove gender bias from English. We don't have to keep doing something just because others are doing it.
160.
▲
by
Naritai
10y ago
Which, based on what I've seen in the news, is pretty insistent these days that it's not Europe ;)
161.
▲
by
Naritai
10y ago
The small layoffs are not usually done for morale reasons; they're done to avoid having to give a WARN notice [1]. Even in cases where a WARN notice is not legally required, it is a PR problem to be admitting that you're laying st
162.
▲
by
Naritai
10y ago
Not sure what else mavelikara was expecting :)
163.
▲
by
Naritai
10y ago
I wish they were more upfront about it as well. Of course, then Silicon Valley (the tv show) wouldn't have the fodder for jokes that it now does.
164.
▲
by
Naritai
10y ago
I'm reminded of an old Hollywood quote, "I'll never work with <actor X> again, unless he's right for the part". Business is business.
165.
▲
by
Naritai
10y ago
My guess is, your down votes relate to your implicit equation of abuse to politics - as though saying statements that politically disagree with you are abuse.
166.
▲
by
Naritai
10y ago
Would you buy a stock that is guaranteed to stay flat for the discernible future? No? Then you have your answer. (let's not forget that, thanks to inflation, 'flat' is actually losing money over time.)
167.
▲
by
Naritai
10y ago
But that's exactly the point. Only way for AirBnB to grow would be that gap that AirBnB is occupying to grow. This could be created by an increase in "the market for people staying places when they travel", or a shrinking o
168.
▲
by
Naritai
10y ago
A libertarian may well do that, but in this world we (Americans) live in, it _is_ a dichotomy. I would say, as an aside, that we give too much credit to the president - you want to cut red tape? Start with the municipal government, and get
169.
▲
by
Naritai
10y ago
This is almost embarrassingly naive. GWB years saw the house, senate, and white house controlled by republicans, yet regulations continued to grow apace. Furthermore, Republicans have long given up any pretext of wanting to reduce governme
170.
▲
by
Naritai
10y ago
I applaud your pinpoint application of the 'No True Scotsman' fallacy.
171.
▲
by
Naritai
10y ago
The thing is, researchers commonly put in throwaway lines like your latter quote to avoid themselves from being embarrassed by some new study that comes out in the future. The key to comprehension is appreciation which portions are fundame
172.
▲
by
Naritai
10y ago
They really are!
173.
▲
by
Naritai
10y ago
I'm guessing s/he means that there are fewer total such sites, so any regulatory body wouldn't have as many individual properties to monitor. That is to say, it's a reference to the effort of the regulatory body, not of
174.
▲
by
Naritai
10y ago
I would guess that the bulk of the costs is installing the processing power that enables the encryption.
175.
▲
by
Naritai
10y ago
I assume you mean "in all practicality it will mostly mean a few more [workers] will be hired, and that it will be more difficult to get more [hours in your shift] than 8 hours a day." It's not clear to me, of course, why any
176.
▲
by
Naritai
10y ago
I thought about this as well, and concluded that FB must be reporting 'video views' as any time a video starts autoplaying (or something similar). In this way I could see the total estimated viewing time getting significantly ove
177.
▲
by
Naritai
10y ago
Attempting to speak for the rest of the group: You sound like the Wells Fargo CEO, who was criticized for using the term 'unethical' for actions that were clearly 'illegal'. That is, he used words for clearly illegal a
178.
▲
by
Naritai
10y ago
A lot of people seem to be commenting that a 20-person office would hardly move the needle at Twitter. They're right, in general - the total numbers are too small to be layoffs and it covered an entire office so is unlikely to be perf
179.
▲
by
Naritai
10y ago
No different from mud on a windshield. Alert goes off that it can't drive until the camera is cleaned off.
180.
▲
by
Naritai
10y ago
I'm all for getting my news fast and clean, but this is ridiculous. At least provide a source.
More ›