NTDF9

53 ms·

481.
by NTDF9 9y ago
Enough to build a Dropbox inside Yahoo.
482.
by NTDF9 9y ago
Hooli in the making?
483.
by NTDF9 9y ago
Take 50 million out of that and find really skilled engineers and product guys and maybe the company could turn around?
484.
by NTDF9 9y ago
I've been hearing a lot of this from people in tech and I think I know the reason why this happens to guys like you. Here are some of my observations: - You are in tech, so you are possibly an introverted nerd. Which means, you feel dr
485.
by NTDF9 9y ago
"Don't use tensorflow to predict everything"
486.
by NTDF9 9y ago
I got it at a time when I was just out of college with only $6000 in my account...so yeah, people like me need financing.
487.
by NTDF9 9y ago
What if I don't remember what accounts I have? There are so many accounts with so many aliases, I don't even remember defunct accounts. Also, does email count as social media?
488.
by NTDF9 9y ago
This is very cool. I wonder which company will actually try this out.
489.
by NTDF9 9y ago
I'm glad you asked. I have been following your blogs and posts about interviews and this is the first time I've seen you ask this. This is positive. I do not have a bulletproof solution but I have implemented processes in my curre
490.
by NTDF9 9y ago
>> And? By your logic, if a lawyer tells you how to handle some unfair legal situation, that lawyer is doing something wrong. Because they're profiting from something that's unfair. Just putting things into perspective for O
491.
by NTDF9 9y ago
The process is flawed in that it ignores the ability of interviewers to rate a candidate. The solution to this is not getting rid of coding interviews because (coding sure is important). But the overweight emphasis on coding as a binary dec
492.
by NTDF9 9y ago
Quantifying assumes that the "raters" remain the same forever. That's not true though. Raters change. Counter intuitively, as the rater gets more and more familiar with the problem, the less tolerance they have for mistakes.
493.
by NTDF9 9y ago
She's profiting from it
494.
by NTDF9 9y ago
>> >Either way, it’s very common for a candidate to get rejected and then get an offer a year or two later. What OP implies is that the interview process is out of candidate's control and there are many variables in play. What
495.
by NTDF9 9y ago
>> No, it's not about knowledge. The knowledge is needed. But the real focus of the interview is to tackle a new question. >>There generally isn't. What an interviewer should be looking at is not some sort of percent c
496.
by NTDF9 9y ago
>> You should know what a binary search tree. You probably don't need to know the specifics of how to balance one. Fine. I know this. Will this give me a job? No >> Yes, I understand that interview prep might interfere with
497.
by NTDF9 9y ago
You got it wrong! It's more like: C-M-handstand-q-footpedal
498.
by NTDF9 9y ago
Leave it to America to make children a pseudo-slave right when they enter adulthood.
499.
by NTDF9 9y ago
Share of GDP seems important. Why is this rubbish?
500.
by NTDF9 9y ago
>> If the cost of the car registration included the true cost of parking on city streets living in your car would likely be much less attractive for these people who can afford housing but simply choose not to. If the cost of property
501.
by NTDF9 9y ago
I have been pretty vocal about how retarded their hiring processes are, including on hacker news. You should see how many downvotes and comments I get from people supporting current hiring processes. I sometimes wonder if people working in
502.
by NTDF9 9y ago
Does anyone else feel like OP is having to do waaay too much to land a job?
503.
by NTDF9 9y ago
One of the insights about data as a resource is that it is renewable. Every year, there are new 18 year olds joining Facebook volunteering their data (same for other user data mining companies).
504.
by NTDF9 9y ago
>> He'd sit down and take a sip of his tea, a hit of opium, sprinkle some pepper on his eggs and explain that we had globalisation before both world wars. The globalization before world wars was the type which favored the British
505.
by NTDF9 9y ago
Extreme globalization is bad. But globalization is good. Before globalization, there existed wars. Ask your Grandpa.
506.
by NTDF9 9y ago
You are assuming I'm calling other people stupid. I'm merely claiming that the bigger global powers at play simply don't matter to the average human as much as their immediate circumstances (job, family, income, healthcare)..
507.
by NTDF9 9y ago
>> There is a very interesting failure of imagination of the remain campaign in assuming that their best interests were the same as other people's, and denigrating or dismissing other people's concerns as due to stupidity or
508.
by NTDF9 9y ago
There is a major design flaw in democracy. Democracy works on majority votes which is a form of consensus. - If the majority believe that money is important, then they'll vote to reflect that - If the majority believe that God exists a
509.
by NTDF9 9y ago
But but...then what will the MBAs and C-suites do if they can't stack rank and yank people, saving some $$ and getting their own promotions?
510.
by NTDF9 9y ago
I'm sorry. If a Stanford grad gets the same job as a bootcamper, I fail to see the value of college. It's not so much about marginalizing a job as much as an examination of the value of education from a good school. Either educati

More ›